Literature DB >> 26274384

Determining The Electromyographic Fatigue Threshold Following a Single Visit Exercise Test.

Sujay S Galen1, Darren R Guffey2, Jared W Coburn3, Moh H Malek4.   

Abstract

Theoretically, the electromyographic (EMG) fatigue threshold is the exercise intensity an individual can maintain indefinitely without the need to recruit more motor units which is associated with an increase in the EMG amplitude. Although different protocols have been used to estimate the EMG fatigue threshold they require multiple visits which are impractical for a clinical setting. Here, we present a protocol for estimating the EMG fatigue threshold for cycle ergometry which requires a single visit. This protocol is simple, convenient, and completed within 15-20 min, therefore, has the potential to be translated into a tool that clinicians can use in exercise prescription.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26274384      PMCID: PMC4544977          DOI: 10.3791/52729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  19 in total

1.  The influence of the muscle fiber pennation angle and innervation zone on the identification of neuromuscular fatigue during cycle ergometry.

Authors:  Clayton L Camic; Terry J Housh; C Russell Hendrix; Jorge M Zuniga; Haley C Bergstrom; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Comparison of critical force to EMG fatigue thresholds during isometric leg extension.

Authors:  C Russell Hendrix; Terry J Housh; Glen O Johnson; Michelle Mielke; Clayton L Camic; Jorge M Zuniga; Richard J Schmidt
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  Physical work capacity in older adults: implications for the aging worker.

Authors:  Glen P Kenny; Jane E Yardley; Lucie Martineau; Ollie Jay
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Comparing EMG amplitude patterns of responses during dynamic exercise: polynomial vs log-transformed regression.

Authors:  R J Blaesser; L M Couls; C F Lee; J M Zuniga; M H Malek
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Factors affecting the estimation of physical working capacity at the fatigue threshold.

Authors:  H A deVries; T J Housh; G O Johnson; S A Evans; G D Tharp; D J Housh; R A Hughes
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  The influence of the run intensity on bioelectrical activity of selected human leg muscles.

Authors:  Andrzej Mastalerz; Lucyna Gwarek; Jerzy Sadowski; Tadeusz Szczepański
Journal:  Acta Bioeng Biomech       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.073

7.  A method for estimating physical working capacity at the fatigue threshold (PWCFT).

Authors:  H A deVries; M W Tichy; T J Housh; K D Smyth; A M Tichy; D J Housh
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Quantifying the effects of electrode distance from the innervation zone on the electromyographic amplitude versus torque relationships.

Authors:  Trent J Herda; Jorge M Zuniga; Eric D Ryan; Clayton L Camic; Haley C Bergstrom; Doug B Smith; Joseph P Weir; Joel T Cramer; Terry J Housh
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.833

9.  The relationship between anaerobic threshold and electromyographic fatigue threshold in college women.

Authors:  T Matsumoto; K Ito; T Moritani
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1991

10.  Neuromuscular and metabolic comparisons between ramp and step incremental cycle ergometer tests.

Authors:  Jorge M Zuniga; Terry J Housh; Clayton L Camic; Haley C Bergstrom; Daniel A Traylor; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.217

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Wet, volatile, and dry biomarkers of exercise-induced muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Josef Finsterer; Vivian E Drory
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.362

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.