Literature DB >> 26272728

Relevant feature set estimation with a knock-out strategy and random forests.

Melanie Ganz1, Douglas N Greve2, Bruce Fischl3, Ender Konukoglu4.   

Abstract

Group analysis of neuroimaging data is a vital tool for identifying anatomical and functional variations related to diseases as well as normal biological processes. The analyses are often performed on a large number of highly correlated measurements using a relatively smaller number of samples. Despite the correlation structure, the most widely used approach is to analyze the data using univariate methods followed by post-hoc corrections that try to account for the data's multivariate nature. Although widely used, this approach may fail to recover from the adverse effects of the initial analysis when local effects are not strong. Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) is a powerful alternative to the univariate approach for identifying relevant variations. Jointly analyzing all the measures, MVPA techniques can detect global effects even when individual local effects are too weak to detect with univariate analysis. Current approaches are successful in identifying variations that yield highly predictive and compact models. However, they suffer from lessened sensitivity and instabilities in identification of relevant variations. Furthermore, current methods' user-defined parameters are often unintuitive and difficult to determine. In this article, we propose a novel MVPA method for group analysis of high-dimensional data that overcomes the drawbacks of the current techniques. Our approach explicitly aims to identify all relevant variations using a "knock-out" strategy and the Random Forest algorithm. In evaluations with synthetic datasets the proposed method achieved substantially higher sensitivity and accuracy than the state-of-the-art MVPA methods, and outperformed the univariate approach when the effect size is low. In experiments with real datasets the proposed method identified regions beyond the univariate approach, while other MVPA methods failed to replicate the univariate results. More importantly, in a reproducibility study with the well-known ADNI dataset the proposed method yielded higher stability and power than the univariate approach.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interpretability; Knock-out; Multivariate pattern analysis; Random forests; Relevant features

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26272728      PMCID: PMC4618061          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  53 in total

1.  Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies of older adults: a shrinking brain.

Authors:  Susan M Resnick; Dzung L Pham; Michael A Kraut; Alan B Zonderman; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics.

Authors:  Yvan Saeys; Iñaki Inza; Pedro Larrañaga
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Information mapping with pattern classifiers: a comparative study.

Authors:  Francisco Pereira; Matthew Botvinick
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in brain morphology from infancy to late adulthood.

Authors:  A Pfefferbaum; D H Mathalon; E V Sullivan; J M Rawles; R B Zipursky; K O Lim
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1994-09

7.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Automated cortical thickness measurements from MRI can accurately separate Alzheimer's patients from normal elderly controls.

Authors:  Jason P Lerch; Jens Pruessner; Alex P Zijdenbos; D Louis Collins; Stefan J Teipel; Harald Hampel; Alan C Evans
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Deriving statistical significance maps for SVM based image classification and group comparisons.

Authors:  Bilwaj Gaonkar; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2012

10.  Age-related gray matter volume changes in the brain during non-elderly adulthood.

Authors:  Débora Terribilli; Maristela S Schaufelberger; Fábio L S Duran; Marcus V Zanetti; Pedro K Curiati; Paulo R Menezes; Márcia Scazufca; Edson Amaro; Cláudia C Leite; Geraldo F Busatto
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 4.673

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Recent publications from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Reviewing progress toward improved AD clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Leslie M Shaw; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 21.566

2.  MIDAS: Regionally linear multivariate discriminative statistical mapping.

Authors:  Erdem Varol; Aristeidis Sotiras; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A Bayesian probit model with spatially varying coefficients for brain decoding using fMRI data.

Authors:  Fengqing Zhang; Wenxin Jiang; Patrick Wong; Ji-Ping Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Random Forests Based Group Importance Scores and Their Statistical Interpretation: Application for Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Marie Wehenkel; Antonio Sutera; Christine Bastin; Pierre Geurts; Christophe Phillips
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Random forest prediction of Alzheimer's disease using pairwise selection from time series data.

Authors:  P J Moore; T J Lyons; J Gallacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Using path signatures to predict a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  P J Moore; T J Lyons; J Gallacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Risk factors and machine learning model for predicting hospitalization outcomes in geriatric patients with dementia.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Chika F Ezeana; Lin Wang; Mamta Puppala; Yan-Siang Huang; Yunjie He; Xiaohui Yu; Zheng Yin; Hong Zhao; Eugene C Lai; Stephen T C Wong
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2022-09-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.