Literature DB >> 23285616

Deriving statistical significance maps for SVM based image classification and group comparisons.

Bilwaj Gaonkar1, Christos Davatzikos.   

Abstract

Population based pattern analysis and classification for quantifying structural and functional differences between diverse groups has been shown to be a powerful tool for the study of a number of diseases, and is quite commonly used especially in neuroimaging. The alternative to these pattern analysis methods, namely mass univariate methods such as voxel based analysis and all related methods, cannot detect multivariate patterns associated with group differences, and are not particularly suitable for developing individual-based diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. A commonly used pattern analysis tool is the support vector machine (SVM). Unlike univariate statistical frameworks for morphometry, analytical tools for statistical inference are unavailable for the SVM. In this paper, we show that null distributions ordinarily obtained by permutation tests using SVMs can be analytically approximated from the data. The analytical computation takes a small fraction of the time it takes to do an actual permutation test, thereby rendering it possible to quickly create statistical significance maps derived from SVMs. Such maps are critical for understanding imaging patterns of group differences and interpreting which anatomical regions are important in determining the classifier's decision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23285616      PMCID: PMC3703958          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33415-3_89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv


  6 in total

Review 1.  Voxel-based morphometry--the methods.

Authors:  J Ashburner; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Why voxel-based morphometric analysis should be used with great caution when characterizing group differences.

Authors:  Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Classifying brain states and determining the discriminating activation patterns: Support Vector Machine on functional MRI data.

Authors:  Janaina Mourão-Miranda; Arun L W Bokde; Christine Born; Harald Hampel; Martin Stetter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits.

Authors:  Joel N Hirschhorn; Mark J Daly
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Support vector machine learning-based fMRI data group analysis.

Authors:  Ze Wang; Anna R Childress; Jiongjiong Wang; John A Detre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Stefan Klöppel; Cynthia M Stonnington; Carlton Chu; Bogdan Draganski; Rachael I Scahill; Jonathan D Rohrer; Nick C Fox; Clifford R Jack; John Ashburner; Richard S J Frackowiak
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 13.501

  6 in total
  12 in total

1.  Relevant feature set estimation with a knock-out strategy and random forests.

Authors:  Melanie Ganz; Douglas N Greve; Bruce Fischl; Ender Konukoglu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  NeuroQuery, comprehensive meta-analysis of human brain mapping.

Authors:  Jérôme Dockès; Russell A Poldrack; Romain Primet; Hande Gözükan; Tal Yarkoni; Fabian Suchanek; Bertrand Thirion; Gaël Varoquaux
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Deriving statistical significance maps for support vector regression using medical imaging data.

Authors:  Bilwaj Gaonkar; Aristeidis Sotiras; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Int Workshop Pattern Recognit Neuroimaging       Date:  2013

4.  Analytic estimation of statistical significance maps for support vector machine based multi-variate image analysis and classification.

Authors:  Bilwaj Gaonkar; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Interpreting support vector machine models for multivariate group wise analysis in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Bilwaj Gaonkar; Russell T Shinohara; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Searchlight analysis: promise, pitfalls, and potential.

Authors:  Joset A Etzel; Jeffrey M Zacks; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A comparison of supervised machine learning algorithms and feature vectors for MS lesion segmentation using multimodal structural MRI.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Sweeney; Joshua T Vogelstein; Jennifer L Cuzzocreo; Peter A Calabresi; Daniel S Reich; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Russell T Shinohara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An evaluation of volume-based morphometry for prediction of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Daniel Schmitter; Alexis Roche; Bénédicte Maréchal; Delphine Ribes; Ahmed Abdulkadir; Meritxell Bach-Cuadra; Alessandro Daducci; Cristina Granziera; Stefan Klöppel; Philippe Maeder; Reto Meuli; Gunnar Krueger
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  A machine learning approach to automated structural network analysis: application to neonatal encephalopathy.

Authors:  Etay Ziv; Olga Tymofiyeva; Donna M Ferriero; A James Barkovich; Chris P Hess; Duan Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Bayesian multi-task learning for decoding multi-subject neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Andre F Marquand; Michael Brammer; Steven C R Williams; Orla M Doyle
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.