| Literature DB >> 26272696 |
Alice Conigliaro1, Viviana Costa2, Alessia Lo Dico3, Laura Saieva3, Simona Buccheri3,4, Francesco Dieli3, Mauro Manno5, Samuele Raccosta5, Carmine Mancone6,7, Marco Tripodi7,8, Giacomo De Leo3, Riccardo Alessandro9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CD90+ liver cancer cells have been described as cancer stem-cell-like (CSC), displaying aggressive and metastatic phenotype. Using two different in vitro models, already described as CD90+ liver cancer stem cells, our aim was to study their interaction with endothelial cells mediated by the release of exosomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26272696 PMCID: PMC4536801 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-015-0426-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cancer ISSN: 1476-4598 Impact factor: 27.401
Fig. 1CD90+ population. a Huh7 and sorted CD90+ Huh7 were stained for hepatocytic (HNF4alpha), epithelial (E-Cadherin) and mesenchymal (Vimentin) markers, in blue the nuclear staining with DAPI. Characterization of isolated exosomes. b Dynamic light scattering of vesicles isolated from Huh7 (in black) and from CD90 + Huh7 cells (in red). c Western blot for endosomal markers Alix, Tsg101 and HSC70 in Huh7 and CD90+Huh7 population with their relative exosomes. d Confocal microscopy analysis on HUVECs treated for 1, 3, and 6 h with 5 μg/ml of exosomes from CD90+ or Huh7 cells. HUVECs were stained with phalloidin Alexa Fluor488 (green), nuclear counterstaining was done using DAPI (blue), exosomes were labelled with PKH26 (red)
Fig. 2HUVECs characterization after exosomes treatment: a RT-PCR analyses for VEGF, VEGF-R and ICAM1 were done on HUVECs 18 h after treatment with CD90+ or Huh7-derived exosomes (5 μg/ml). ΔΔct expressed as fold of induction (FOI) compared with control (untreated cells). ***p < 0.001; *p < 0.05. b Left panel: ELISA for VEGF released by HUVECs 18 h after treatment with CD90 + exo or Huh7exo. Untreated cells were used as control. *p < 0.05. Middle-right panels: Tubulogenesis analysis. Phase contrast micrographs (20×) and quantification of matrigel assay expressed as length of cable as arbitrary unit. c FACS analysis for ICAM-1 on HUVECs 18 h after treatment with Huh7exo or CD90 + exo, respectively. d Adhesion capacity. Left panel: Phase contrast micrographs (20×) showing the adhesion of CD90 + cells on HUVEC monolayer pre-treated with Huh7exo or CD90 + exo. Right panel: Quantification of adhesion established by counting the number of adherent CD90 + cells (violet) per field; *p < 0.05
Fig. 3a. LncRNAs expressed in CD90+ cells and their exosomes (left and middle panel). Data are expressed as fold induction compared with Huh7 mix population. Of the 90 lncRNAs analyzed, only those over-expressed more than ten-fold in CD90+ cells were considered. Listed on the right the lncRNA up-regulated in HCC. Right panel: LncRNA Profile in exosomes released by CD90 + Huh7. Data are expressed as fold of induction compared with exosomes from Huh7 parental cells. b H19 analysis. Real-time PCR analysis for H19 expression in exosomes derived from Huh7 or CD90+ cells. Exosomes were treated with RNase and subsequently processed for RNA extraction and retrotrascription. Data were normalized for β-actin and ΔΔct indicated as fold of induction compared with Huh7-derived exosomes. ***p < 0.001. c Real-time PCR for H19 on HUVEC 18 h after treatment with CD90 + exo or Huh7exo. Data were normalized for β-actin and ΔΔct indicated as fold of induction compared with control (untreated cells). ***p < 0.001
Fig. 4H19 overexpression. a Left panel: Real-time PCR performed on HUVECs 18 h post-transfection. Data were normalized for β-actin and ΔΔct expressed as fold of induction pH19 vs. pEmpty **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. Right panel: ELISA assay for VEGF level in supernatant from HUVECs 18 h after transfection. ***p < 0.001. b Left Panel: Phase contrast (20×) of tubulogenesis assay performed 18 h after transfection. Right panel: quantification of matrigel assay expressed as length of cable as arbitrary unit*p<0.05. c FACS analysis for ICAM expression in HUVEC transfected cells. d Left Panel: Phase contrast micrographs (20×) showing the adhesion of CD90 + cells on HUVEC monolayer transfected with pEmpty or pH19. Right Panel Quantification was calculated by counting the number of adherent CD90+ cells (violet) per field. **p < 0.01
Fig. 5a Real-time PCR for H19, VEGF, VEGFR1 and ICAM1 from HUVECs transfected with H19 siRNA or negative scramble and treated with CD90 + exo. Data were normalized for β-actin and ΔΔct expressed as fold of induction siRNA H19 versus negative control. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 b ELISA assay for VEGF detection on the supernatant from HUVECs treated as indicated above. ***p < 0.001