Literature DB >> 26271638

Auditory distraction: A duplex-mechanism account.

Robert W Hughes1.   

Abstract

A body of laboratory work is reviewed suggesting that auditory distraction comes in two functionally distinct forms. Interference-by-process is produced when the involuntary processing of the sound competes with a similar process applied deliberately to perform a focal task. In contrast, attentional capture is produced when the sound causes a disengagement of attention away from the prevailing task, regardless of the task processes involved. Particular attention is devoted to reviewing a range of converging evidence from both experimental and individual- and group-differences-based research, indicating that auditory attentional capture is controllable via greater top-down task engagement whereas interference-by-process is not.
© 2014 The Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Keywords:  attentional capture; auditory distraction; cognitive control; interference-by-process; serial recall

Year:  2014        PMID: 26271638     DOI: 10.1002/pchj.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psych J        ISSN: 2046-0252


  30 in total

1.  Decomposing the role of rehearsal in auditory distraction during serial recall.

Authors:  Angela M AuBuchon; Corey I McGill; Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Audit Percept Cogn       Date:  2020-11-10

Review 2.  Auditory attentional capture: implicit and explicit approaches.

Authors:  Polly Dalton; Robert W Hughes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-19

3.  Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sarah F Poissant; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Auditory distraction in school-age children relative to individual differences in working memory capacity.

Authors:  Naveen K Nagaraj; Beula M Magimairaj; Sarah Schwartz
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Auditory distraction does more than disrupt rehearsal processes in children's serial recall.

Authors:  Angela M AuBuchon; Corey I McGill; Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

6.  Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.

Authors:  Larissa Leist; Thomas Lachmann; Sabine J Schlittmeier; Markus Georgi; Maria Klatte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-10-03

7.  Paying attention to speech: The role of working memory capacity and professional experience.

Authors:  Bar Lambez; Galit Agmon; Paz Har-Shai Yahav; Yuri Rassovsky; Elana Zion Golumbic
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Updating working memory in aircraft noise and speech noise causes different fMRI activations.

Authors:  Bjørn Saetrevik; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2014-10-28

9.  Costs of switching auditory spatial attention in following conversational turn-taking.

Authors:  Gaven Lin; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  How Concentration Shields Against Distraction.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; John E Marsh
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.