Literature DB >> 26269724

Analysis of Mandibular Test Specimens Used to Assess a Bone Fixation System.

Leandro Stocco Baccarin1, Renato Correa Viana Casarin2, Jorge Vicente Lopes-da-Silva3, Luis Augusto Passeri4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess through biomechanical testing if different synthetic materials used to fabricate test specimens have a different biomechanical behavior in comparison with other materials when simulating in vitro load resistance of a fixation method established for sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). Thirty synthetic and standardized human hemimandible replicas with SSRO were divided into three groups of 10 samples each. Group A-ABS plastic; Group B-polyamide; and Group C-polyurethane. These were fixated with three bicortical position screws (16 mm in length, 2.0-mm system) in an inverted l pattern using perforation guide and 5-mm advancement. Each sample was submitted to linear vertical load, and load strength values were recorded at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 mm of displacement. The means and standard deviation were compared using the analysis of variance (p < 0.05) and the Tukey test. A tendency for lower values was observed in Group B in comparison with Groups A and C. At 3 and 5 mm of displacement, a difference between Groups A and C was found in comparison with Group B (p < 0.05). At 7 and 10 mm of displacement, a difference was found among the three groups, in which Group C showed the highest values and Group B the lowest (p < 0.05). Taking into consideration the results obtained and the behavior of each material used as a substrate, significant differences occurred among the materials when compared among them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; mandibular advancement; osteotomy; sagittal split ramus osteotomy

Year:  2014        PMID: 26269724      PMCID: PMC4532570          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1393732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  32 in total

Review 1.  Bicortical screw stabilization of sagittal split osteotomies.

Authors:  Mark W Ochs
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  In vitro strength analysis of sagittal split osteotomy fixation: noncompression monocortical plates versus bicortical position screws.

Authors:  B Anucul; P D Waite; J E Lemons
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of a T-shaped miniplate fixation of a modified sagittal split ramus osteotomy with buccal step, a new technique for mandibular orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Zaher Aymach; Hitoshi Nei; Hiroshi Kawamura; William Bell
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2010-06-26

4.  Effect of the angle of the screw on the stability of the mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a study in sheep mandibles.

Authors:  S Uckan; A Schwimmer; F Kummer; A M Greenberg
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.651

5.  In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Paulo Domingos Ribeiro-Junior; Osvaldo Magro-Filho; Kalpakam A Shastri; Maria B Papageorge
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Comparative evaluation of screw configuration on the stability of the sagittal split osteotomy.

Authors:  W C Ardary; D J Tracy; M M Urata
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1989-08

7.  An in vitro comparison of the mechanical characteristics of three sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.

Authors:  M T Murphy; R H Haug; J E Barber
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  A comparative in vitro study on fixation of sagittal split osteotomies with Würzburg screws, Champy miniplates, and Biofix (biodegradable) rods.

Authors:  J P Bouwman; D B Tuinzing; P J Kostense
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Mechanical evaluation of different techniques for symphysis fracture fixation--an in vitro polyurethane mandible study.

Authors:  Thalita Regina Vieira e Oliveira; Luis Augusto Passeri
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.

Authors:  Bernardo Ferreira Brasileiro; Rafael Grotta Grempel; Glaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano; Luis Augusto Passeri
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.