Literature DB >> 11437421

Effect of the angle of the screw on the stability of the mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a study in sheep mandibles.

S Uckan1, A Schwimmer, F Kummer, A M Greenberg.   

Abstract

We compared the biomechanical stability of 60 degrees and 90 degrees angles for insertion of screws for fixation of sagittal split ramus osteotomies (SSROs) in 10 sheep mandibles in vitro. After 5 mm advancements, the osteotomies were fixed with screws 2 mm in diameter inserted with a torque control screwdriver at either 60 degrees or 90 degrees to the long axis of bone, in a matched pair experimental design. All specimens were then loaded in a physiological manner and the load-displacement of the osteotomies was recorded. Data for resistance to movement were compared by a paired t -test. The mean (SD) resistance to movement for the 60 degrees and 90 degrees screw insertions was 63.4 (27.7) N/mm and 59 (22.3) N/mm respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups. This correlates with clinical findings. Copyright 2001 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11437421     DOI: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of Mandibular Test Specimens Used to Assess a Bone Fixation System.

Authors:  Leandro Stocco Baccarin; Renato Correa Viana Casarin; Jorge Vicente Lopes-da-Silva; Luis Augusto Passeri
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-20

2.  Comparison of the Stability of Mandibular Sagittal Osteotomy Fixation between Two Types of Titanium Miniplates: A Biomechanical Study in Sheep Mandibles.

Authors:  Guilherme Dos Santos Trento; Felipe Andrade Pires; Fábio André Dos Santos; Delson João da Costa; Nelson Luis Barbosa Rebellato; Leandro Eduardo Klüppel
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-05-18

3.  Comparison of strengths of five internal fixation methods used after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Farzin Sarkarat; Atiye Ahmady; Farzam Farahmand; Ali Fateh; Roozbeh Kahali; Amir Nourani; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-08-14

4.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Seven Fixation Methods for Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy with Four Advancement Levels by Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Yu He; Henglei Zhang; Jia Qiao; Xi Fu; Shixing Xu; Qi Jin; Jianfeng Liu; Ying Chen; Bing Yu; Feng Niu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-04

Review 5.  TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.

Authors:  José Valladares-Neto; Lucia Helena Cevidanes; Wesley Cabral Rocha; Guilherme de Araújo Almeida; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of three stable internal fixation techniques used in sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: a study in sheep mandibles.

Authors:  Leandro Benetti de Olivera; Eduardo Sant' Ana; Antonio José Manzato; Fábio Luis Bunemer Guerra; G William Arnett
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.