Literature DB >> 26269649

Concurrent TMS-fMRI Reveals Interactions between Dorsal and Ventral Attentional Systems.

Joana Leitão1, Axel Thielscher2, Johannes Tünnerhoff3, Uta Noppeney4.   

Abstract

Adaptive behavior relies on combining bottom-up sensory inputs with top-down control signals to guide responses in line with current goals and task demands. Over the past decade, accumulating evidence has suggested that the dorsal and ventral frontoparietal attentional systems are recruited interactively in this process. This fMRI study used concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a causal perturbation approach to investigate the interactions between dorsal and ventral attentional systems and sensory processing areas. In a sustained spatial attention paradigm, human participants detected weak visual targets that were presented in the lower-left visual field on 50% of the trials. Further, we manipulated the presence/absence of task-irrelevant auditory signals. Critically, on each trial we applied 10 Hz bursts of four TMS (or Sham) pulses to the intraparietal sulcus (IPS). IPS-TMS relative to Sham-TMS increased activation in the parietal cortex regardless of sensory stimulation, confirming the neural effectiveness of TMS stimulation. Visual targets increased activations in the anterior insula, a component of the ventral attentional system responsible for salience detection. Conversely, they decreased activations in the ventral visual areas. Importantly, IPS-TMS abolished target-evoked activation increases in the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ) of the ventral attentional system, whereas it eliminated target-evoked activation decreases in the right fusiform. Our results demonstrate that IPS-TMS exerts profound directional causal influences not only on visual areas but also on the TPJ as a critical component of the ventral attentional system. They reveal a complex interplay between dorsal and ventral attentional systems during target detection under sustained spatial attention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Adaptive behavior relies on combining bottom-up sensory inputs with top-down attentional control. Although the dorsal and ventral frontoparietal systems are key players in attentional control, their distinct contributions remain unclear. In this TMS-fMRI study, participants attended to the left visual field to detect weak visual targets presented on half of the trials. We applied brief TMS bursts (or Sham-TMS) to the dorsal intraparietal sulcus (IPS) 100 ms after visual stimulus onset. IPS-TMS abolished the visual induced response suppression in the ventral occipitotemporal cortex and the response enhancement to visual targets in the temporoparietal junction. Our results demonstrate that IPS causally influences neural activity in the ventral attentional system 100 ms poststimulus. They have important implications for our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying attentional control.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3511445-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  detection; interleaved/concurrent TMS-fMRI; multisensory; neglect; right parietal cortex; spatial attention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26269649      PMCID: PMC6605127          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0939-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  74 in total

1.  Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses.

Authors:  K J Friston; A P Holmes; C J Price; C Büchel; K J Worsley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks.

Authors:  D E Linden; D Prvulovic; E Formisano; M Völlinger; F E Zanella; R Goebel; T Dierks
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex.

Authors:  S Kastner; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation.

Authors:  S Kastner; M A Pinsk; P De Weerd; R Desimone; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems.

Authors:  G M Edelman; J A Gally
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  M Corbetta; J M Kincade; J M Ollinger; M P McAvoy; G L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention.

Authors:  A Martínez; L Anllo-Vento; M I Sereno; L R Frank; R B Buxton; D J Dubowitz; E C Wong; H Hinrichs; H J Heinze; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Detection of audio-visual integration sites in humans by application of electrophysiological criteria to the BOLD effect.

Authors:  G A Calvert; P C Hansen; S D Iversen; M J Brammer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex.

Authors:  C C Hilgetag; H Théoret; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  21 in total

1.  Single pulse TMS to the DLPFC, compared to a matched sham control, induces a direct, causal increase in caudate, cingulate, and thalamic BOLD signal.

Authors:  Logan T Dowdle; Truman R Brown; Mark S George; Colleen A Hanlon
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Distinct Neural Mechanisms of Spatial Attention and Expectation Guide Perceptual Inference in a Multisensory World.

Authors:  Arianna Zuanazzi; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to assessment of brain connectivity and networks.

Authors:  Mark Hallett; Riccardo Di Iorio; Paolo Maria Rossini; Jung E Park; Robert Chen; Pablo Celnik; Antonio P Strafella; Hideyuki Matsumoto; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  EPI distortion correction for concurrent human brain stimulation and imaging at 3T.

Authors:  Hyuntaek Oh; Jung Hwan Kim; Jeffrey M Yau
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Attention network modulation via tRNS correlates with attention gain.

Authors:  Federica Contò; Grace Edwards; Sarah Tyler; Danielle Parrott; Emily Grossman; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Dissociable causal roles of the frontal and parietal cortices in the effect of object location on object identity detection: a TMS study.

Authors:  Ping Yang; Min Wang; Cimei Luo; Xuejin Ni; Ling Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  State-dependent effects of neural stimulation on brain function and cognition.

Authors:  Claire Bradley; Abbey S Nydam; Paul E Dux; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 38.755

8.  Oscillatory dynamics in the dorsal and ventral attention networks during the reorienting of attention.

Authors:  Amy L Proskovec; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Alex I Wiesman; Timothy J McDermott; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  Linking ADHD to the Neural Circuitry of Attention.

Authors:  Adrienne Mueller; David S Hong; Steven Shepard; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation alters multivoxel patterns in the absence of overall activity changes.

Authors:  Farshad Rafiei; Martin Safrin; Martijn E Wokke; Hakwan Lau; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.