Literature DB >> 30659086

Distinct Neural Mechanisms of Spatial Attention and Expectation Guide Perceptual Inference in a Multisensory World.

Arianna Zuanazzi1, Uta Noppeney2.   

Abstract

Spatial attention (i.e., task-relevance) and expectation (i.e., signal probability) are two critical top-down mechanisms guiding perceptual inference. Spatial attention prioritizes processing of information at task-relevant locations. Spatial expectations encode the statistical structure of the environment. An unresolved question is how the brain allocates attention and forms expectations in a multisensory environment, where task-relevance and signal probability over space can differ across sensory modalities. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging in human participants (female and male) to investigate whether the brain encodes task-relevance and signal probability over space separately or interactively across sensory modalities. In a novel multisensory paradigm, we manipulated spatial attention and expectation selectively in audition and assessed their effects on behavioral and neural responses to auditory and visual stimuli. Our results show that both auditory and visual stimuli increased activations in a right-lateralized frontoparietal system, when they were presented at locations that were task-irrelevant in audition. Yet, only auditory stimuli increased activations in the medial prefrontal cortex when presented at expected locations and in audiovisual and frontoparietal cortices signaling a prediction error when presented at unexpected locations. This dissociation in multisensory generalization for attention and expectation effects shows that the brain controls attentional resources interactively across the senses but encodes the statistical structure of the environment as spatial expectations independently for each sensory system. Our results demonstrate that spatial attention and expectation engage partly overlapping neural systems via distinct mechanisms to guide perceptual inference in a multisensory world.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In our natural environment the brain is exposed to a constant influx of signals through all our senses. How does the brain allocate attention and form spatial expectations in this multisensory environment? Because observers need to respond to stimuli regardless of their sensory modality, they may allocate attentional resources and encode the probability of events jointly across the senses. This psychophysics and neuroimaging study shows that the brain controls attentional resources interactively across the senses via a frontoparietal system but encodes the statistical structure of the environment independently for each sense in sensory and frontoparietal areas. Thus, spatial attention and expectation engage partly overlapping neural systems via distinct mechanisms to guide perceptual inference in a multisensory world.
Copyright © 2019 the authors 0270-6474/19/392301-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; expectation; fMRI; multisensory; perceptual decisions; space

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30659086      PMCID: PMC6433765          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2873-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  67 in total

1.  Covert visual spatial orienting and saccades: overlapping neural systems.

Authors:  A C Nobre; D R Gitelman; E C Dias; M M Mesulam
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Can attention be directed to opposite locations in different modalities? An ERP study.

Authors:  M Eimer
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects.

Authors:  R P Rao; D H Ballard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention.

Authors:  J A Brefczynski; E A DeYoe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception.

Authors:  J J McDonald; W A Teder-Sälejärvi; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention.

Authors:  C Spence; F Pavani; J Driver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Supramodal effects of covert spatial orienting triggered by visual or tactile events.

Authors:  Emiliano Macaluso; C D Frith; J Driver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  On asymmetries in cross-modal spatial attention orienting.

Authors:  L M Ward; J J McDonald; D Lin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-08

Review 10.  The planum temporale as a computational hub.

Authors:  Timothy D Griffiths; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 13.837

View more
  6 in total

1.  Shared Physiological Correlates of Multisensory and Expectation-Based Facilitation.

Authors:  Stephanie J Kayser; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-03-09

2.  Attention controls multisensory perception via two distinct mechanisms at different levels of the cortical hierarchy.

Authors:  Ambra Ferrari; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  Perceptual inference, accuracy, and precision in temporal reproduction in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Natsuki Ueda; Kanji Tanaka; Kazushi Maruo; Neil Roach; Tomiki Sumiyoshi; Katsumi Watanabe; Takashi Hanakawa
Journal:  Schizophr Res Cogn       Date:  2021-12-13

4.  Effects of Spatial Speech Presentation on Listener Response Strategy for Talker-Identification.

Authors:  Stefan Uhrig; Andrew Perkis; Sebastian Möller; U Peter Svensson; Dawn M Behne
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Self-prioritization with unisensory and multisensory stimuli in a matching task.

Authors:  Clea Desebrock; Charles Spence; Ayla Barutchu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Modality-specific and multisensory mechanisms of spatial attention and expectation.

Authors:  Arianna Zuanazzi; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.