Literature DB >> 21354977

Double-blind clinical trial of thalamic stimulation in patients with Tourette syndrome.

Linda Ackermans1, Annelien Duits, Chris van der Linden, Marina Tijssen, Koen Schruers, Yasin Temel, Mariska Kleijer, Pieter Nederveen, Richard Bruggeman, Selma Tromp, Vivianne van Kranen-Mastenbroek, Herman Kingma, Danielle Cath, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle.   

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation of the thalamus has been proposed as a therapeutic option in patients with Tourette syndrome who are refractory to pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatment. Patients with intractable Tourette syndrome were invited to take part in a double-blind randomized cross-over trial assessing the efficacy and safety of stimulation of the centromedian nucleus-substantia periventricularis-nucleus ventro-oralis internus crosspoint in the thalamus. After surgery, the patients were randomly assigned to 3 months stimulation followed by 3 months OFF stimulation (Group A) or vice versa (Group B). The cross-over period was followed by 6 months ON stimulation. Assessments were performed prior to surgery and at 3, 6 months and 1 year after surgery. The primary outcome was a change in tic severity as measured by the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale and the secondary outcome was a change in associated behavioural disorders and mood. Possible cognitive side effects were studied during stimulation ON at 1 year postoperatively. Interim analysis was performed on a sample of six male patients with only one patient randomized to Group B. Tic severity during ON stimulation was significantly lower than during OFF stimulation, with substantial improvement (37%) on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (mean 41.1 ± 5.4 versus 25.6 ± 12.8, P = 0.046). The effect of stimulation 1 year after surgery was sustained with significant improvement (49%) on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (mean 42.2 ± 3.1 versus 21.5 ± 11.1, P = 0.028) when compared with preoperative assessments. Secondary outcome measures did not show any effect at a group level, either between ON and OFF stimulation or between preoperative assessment and that at 1 year postoperatively. Cognitive re-assessment at 1 year after surgery showed that patients needed more time to complete the Stroop Colour Word Card test. This test measures selective attention and response inhibition. Serious adverse events included one small haemorrhage ventral to the tip of the electrode, one infection of the pulse generator, subjective gaze disturbances and reduction of energy levels in all patients. The present preliminary findings suggest that stimulation of the centromedian nucleus-substantia periventricularis-nucleus ventro-oralis internus crosspoint may reduce tic severity in refractory Tourette syndrome, but there is the risk of adverse effects related to oculomotor function and energy levels. Further randomized controlled trials on other targets are urgently needed since the search for the optimal one is still ongoing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21354977     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awq380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  73 in total

Review 1.  Network effects of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ahmad Alhourani; Michael M McDowell; Michael J Randazzo; Thomas A Wozny; Efstathios D Kondylis; Witold J Lipski; Sarah Beck; Jordan F Karp; Avniel S Ghuman; R Mark Richardson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Why so many deep brain stimulation targets in Tourette's syndrome? Toward a broadening of the definition of the syndrome.

Authors:  Mauro Porta; Christian Saleh; Edvin Zekaj; Carlotta Zanaboni Dina; Alberto R Bona; Domenico Servello
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Centromedian-parafascicular deep brain stimulation induces differential functional inhibition of the motor, associative, and limbic circuits in large animals.

Authors:  Joo Pyung Kim; Hoon-Ki Min; Emily J Knight; Penelope S Duffy; Osama A Abulseoud; Michael P Marsh; Katherine Kelsey; Charles D Blaha; Kevin E Bennet; Mark A Frye; Kendall H Lee
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Chronic embedded cortico-thalamic closed-loop deep brain stimulation for the treatment of essential tremor.

Authors:  Enrico Opri; Stephanie Cernera; Rene Molina; Robert S Eisinger; Jackson N Cagle; Leonardo Almeida; Timothy Denison; Michael S Okun; Kelly D Foote; Aysegul Gunduz
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Successful pallidal deep brain stimulation in 15-year-old with Tourette syndrome: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  João Massano; Cláudia Sousa; Tom Foltynie; Ludvic Zrinzo; Marwan Hariz; Rui Vaz
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the interface of neurology and psychiatry.

Authors:  Nolan R Williams; Michael S Okun
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Deep-Brain Stimulation for Basal Ganglia Disorders.

Authors:  Thomas Wichmann; Mahlon R Delong
Journal:  Basal Ganglia       Date:  2011-07-01

Review 8.  Abnormal neuronal activity in Tourette syndrome and its modulation using deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Michal Israelashvili; Yocheved Loewenstern; Izhar Bar-Gad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Toward Electrophysiology-Based Intelligent Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders.

Authors:  Andrea A Kühn; R Mark Richardson; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Robert S Turner; Benjamin Blankertz; Tom Mitchell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 10.  Neuromodulation for the treatment of eating disorders and obesity.

Authors:  Darrin J Lee; Gavin J B Elias; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.