Literature DB >> 26268995

Prediction of Core Body Temperature from Multiple Variables.

Victoria L Richmond1, Sarah Davey2, Katy Griggs2, George Havenith2.   

Abstract

This paper aims to improve the prediction of rectal temperature (T re) from insulated skin temperature (T is) and micro-climate temperature (T mc) previously reported (Richmond et al., Insulated skin temperature as a measure of core body temperature for individuals wearing CBRN protective clothing. Physiol Meas 2013; 34:1531-43.) using additional physiological and/or environmental variables, under several clothing and climatic conditions. Twelve male (25.8±5.1 years; 73.6±11.5kg; 178±6cm) and nine female (24.2±5.1 years; 62.4±11.5kg; 169±3cm) volunteers completed six trials, each consisting of two 40-min periods of treadmill walking separated by a 20-min rest, wearing permeable or impermeable clothing, under neutral (25°C, 50%), moderate (35°C, 35%), and hot (40°C, 25%) conditions, with and without solar radiation (600W m(-2)). Participants were measured for heart rate (HR) (Polar, Finland), skin temperature (T s) at 11 sites, T is (Grant, Cambridge, UK), and breathing rate (f) (Hidalgo, Cambridge, UK). T mc and relative humidity were measured within the clothing. T re was monitored as the 'gold standard' measure of T c for industrial or military applications using a 10cm flexible probe (Grant, Cambridge, UK). A stepwise multiple regression analysis was run to determine which of 30 variables (T is, T s at 11 sites, HR, f, T mc, temperature, and humidity inside the clothing front and back, body mass, age, body fat, sex, clothing, Thermal comfort, sensation and perception, and sweat rate) were the strongest on which to base the model. Using a bootstrap methodology to develop the equation, the best model in terms of practicality and validity included T is, T mc, HR, and 'work' (0 = rest; 1 = exercise), predicting T re with a standard error of the estimate of 0.27°C and adjusted r (2) of 0.86. The sensitivity and specificity for predicting individuals who reached 39°C was 97 and 85%, respectively. Insulated skin temperature was the most important individual parameter for the prediction of T re. This paper provides novel information about the viability of predicting T c under a wide range of conditions, using predictors which can practically be measured in a field environment.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extreme environments; heat stress; heat stress indices

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26268995     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mev054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  14 in total

1.  An IR Sensor Based Smart System to Approximate Core Body Temperature.

Authors:  Partha Pratim Ray
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Basic statistical considerations for physiology: The journal Temperature toolbox.

Authors:  Aaron R Caldwell; Samuel N Cheuvront
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2019-06-25

3.  The physiological strain index does not reliably identify individuals at risk of reaching a thermal tolerance limit.

Authors:  Sarah L Davey; Victoria Downie; Katy Griggs; George Havenith
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Skin Temperature Measurement Using Contact Thermometry: A Systematic Review of Setup Variables and Their Effects on Measured Values.

Authors:  Braid A MacRae; Simon Annaheim; Christina M Spengler; René M Rossi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 5.  A Review of Wearable Technologies for Elderly Care that Can Accurately Track Indoor Position, Recognize Physical Activities and Monitor Vital Signs in Real Time.

Authors:  Zhihua Wang; Zhaochu Yang; Tao Dong
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Individualized estimation of human core body temperature using noninvasive measurements.

Authors:  Srinivas Laxminarayan; Vineet Rakesh; Tatsuya Oyama; Josh B Kazman; Ran Yanovich; Itay Ketko; Yoram Epstein; Shawnda Morrison; Jaques Reifman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-02-08

7.  Validity of a noninvasive estimation of deep body temperature when wearing personal protective equipment during exercise and recovery.

Authors:  Andrew P Hunt; Mark J Buller; Matthew J Maley; Joseph T Costello; Ian B Stewart
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2019-06-14

8.  The Dynamic and Correlation of Skin Temperature and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Male Endurance Runners.

Authors:  Jonathan Galan-Carracedo; Andrea Suarez-Segade; Myriam Guerra-Balic; Guillermo R Oviedo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Heat Acclimation Does Not Modify Q 10 and Thermal Cardiac Reactivity.

Authors:  Bernhard Kampmann; Peter Bröde
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Accuracy of Algorithm to Non-Invasively Predict Core Body Temperature Using the Kenzen Wearable Device.

Authors:  Nicole E Moyen; Rohit C Bapat; Beverly Tan; Lindsey A Hunt; Ollie Jay; Toby Mündel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.