Sarah L Davey1,2, Victoria Downie1,3, Katy Griggs1,4, George Havenith5. 1. Environmental Ergonomics Research Centre, Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK. 2. Department of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Oxford, UK. 3. English Institute of Sport, Manchester, UK. 4. Department of Engineering, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK. 5. Environmental Ergonomics Research Centre, Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK. G.Haventh@lboro.ac.uk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The physiological strain index (PSI) was developed to assess individuals' heat strain, yet evidence supporting its use to identify individuals at potential risk of reaching a thermal tolerance limit (TTL) is limited. The aim of this study was to assess whether PSI can identify individuals at risk of reaching a TTL. METHODS: Fifteen females and 21 males undertook a total of 136 trials, each consisting of two 40-60 minute periods of treadmill walking separated by ~ 15 minutes rest, wearing permeable or impermeable clothing, in a range of climatic conditions. Heart rate (HR), skin temperature (Tsk), rectal temperature (Tre), temperature sensation (TS) and thermal comfort (TC) were measured throughout. Various forms of the PSI-index were assessed including the original PSI, PSIfixed, adaptive-PSI (aPSI) and a version comprised of a measure of heat storage (PSIHS). Final physiological and PSI values and their rate of change (ROC) over a trial and in the last 10 minutes of a trial were compared between trials completed (C, 101 trials) and those terminated prematurely (TTL, 35 trials). RESULTS: Final PSIoriginal, PSIfixed, aPSI, PSIHS did not differ between TTL and C (p > 0.05). However, differences between TTL and C occurred in final Tsk, Tre-Tsk, TS, TC and ROC in PSIfixed, Tre, Tsk and HR (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results suggest the PSI, in the various forms, does not reliably identify individuals at imminent risk of reaching their TTL and its validity as a physiological safety index is therefore questionable. However, a physiological-perceptual strain index may provide a more valid measure.
PURPOSE: The physiological strain index (PSI) was developed to assess individuals' heat strain, yet evidence supporting its use to identify individuals at potential risk of reaching a thermal tolerance limit (TTL) is limited. The aim of this study was to assess whether PSI can identify individuals at risk of reaching a TTL. METHODS: Fifteen females and 21 males undertook a total of 136 trials, each consisting of two 40-60 minute periods of treadmill walking separated by ~ 15 minutes rest, wearing permeable or impermeable clothing, in a range of climatic conditions. Heart rate (HR), skin temperature (Tsk), rectal temperature (Tre), temperature sensation (TS) and thermal comfort (TC) were measured throughout. Various forms of the PSI-index were assessed including the original PSI, PSIfixed, adaptive-PSI (aPSI) and a version comprised of a measure of heat storage (PSIHS). Final physiological and PSI values and their rate of change (ROC) over a trial and in the last 10 minutes of a trial were compared between trials completed (C, 101 trials) and those terminated prematurely (TTL, 35 trials). RESULTS: Final PSIoriginal, PSIfixed, aPSI, PSIHS did not differ between TTL and C (p > 0.05). However, differences between TTL and C occurred in final Tsk, Tre-Tsk, TS, TC and ROC in PSIfixed, Tre, Tsk and HR (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results suggest the PSI, in the various forms, does not reliably identify individuals at imminent risk of reaching their TTL and its validity as a physiological safety index is therefore questionable. However, a physiological-perceptual strain index may provide a more valid measure.
Authors: Brett R Ely; Matthew R Ely; Samuel N Cheuvront; Robert W Kenefick; David W Degroot; Scott J Montain Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2009-08-27
Authors: Jacob P Kimball; Omer T Inan; Victor A Convertino; Sylvain Cardin; Michael N Sawka Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Nicolás López-Gálvez; Rietta Wagoner; Robert A Canales; Kacey Ernst; Jefferey L Burgess; Jill de Zapien; Cecilia Rosales; Paloma Beamer Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 6.498