| Literature DB >> 26267069 |
Youngwoo Bryan Yoon1, Je-Yeon Yun2, Wi Hoon Jung3, Kang Ik K Cho1, Sung Nyun Kim2, Tae Young Lee4, Hye Yoon Park2, Jun Soo Kwon5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The superior temporal gyrus (STG) is one of the key regions implicated in psychosis, given that abnormalities in this region are associated with an increased risk of conversion from an at-risk mental state to psychosis. However, inconsistent results regarding the functional connectivity strength of the STG have been reported, and the regional heterogeneous characteristics of the STG should be considered.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26267069 PMCID: PMC4534425 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135347
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics.
| FEP | UHR | HC | Statistics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( |
|
| ||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| Age (year) | 22.73 | 4.89 | 20.78 | 2.52 | 22.09 | 2.96 | 2.995 | .054 |
| Gender (M / F) | 9 / 13 | 29 / 12 | 28 / 19 | 5.312 | .070 | |||
| Education (year) | 13.32 | 1.94 | 13.17 | 1.22 | 13.94 | 1.55 | 3.010 | .053 |
| Handedness (R / L) | 20 / 2 | 37 / 4 | 43 / 4 | .041 | .980 | |||
| Estimated IQ | 104.59 | 11.38 | 111.32 | 12.14 | 110.66 | 11.12 | 2.711 | .071 |
| Clinical rating scales | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
|
| ||
| PANSS | ||||||||
| Total | 68.09 | 10.41 | 61.27 | 13.19 | -2.099 | .040 | ||
| Positive | 15.45 | 4.51 | 12.95 | 2.81 | -2.368 | .025 | ||
| Negative | 17.41 | 4.62 | 16.24 | 5.66 | -.828 | .411 | ||
| General | 35.23 | 5.90 | 32.07 | 7.70 | -1.673 | .099 | ||
| GAF | 48.36 | 8.77 | 50.51 | 7.56 | 1.017 | .313 | ||
Note: FEP, first-episode psychosis; UHR, ultra-high-risk for psychosis; HC, healthy control; IQ, Intelligence quotient. PANSS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; GAF, Global Assessment of Functioning
Fig 1One sample t-tests in healthy controls (HC) to demonstrate the functional connectivity of each subregion of the STG.
The far left illustrates the location of each seed: right planum temporale (PT), left PT, right Heschl’s gyrus (HG), left HG, right planum polare (PP), and left PP in yellow (from top to bottom). The green color indicates a significant functional connectivity map of the HC. Axial slices are presented at z = -50, -38, -26, -15, -4, 8, 19, 30, 42, 53, and 64 (from left to right) (displayed at p < .05, family-wise error rate corrected).
Between Group Difference in Functional Connectivity of Superior Temporal Gyrus.
| Seed Region | Brain Region | MNI Coordinate | Size of Clusters | Cluster | Group | Functional Connectivity | FEP-HC | UHR-HC | FEP-UHR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | (# of Voxels) | (FWE corrected) | Mean | SD | ||||||||
| Left planum temporale | Right Primary Motor Cortex | +58–04 +34 | 165 | .009 | FEP | 0.07 | 0.12 | .007 | < .001 | 1.000 | ||
| UHR | 0.04 | 0.15 | ||||||||||
| HC | 0.19 | 0.16 | ||||||||||
| Right Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex | +40 +52 +24 | 138 | .021 | FEP | 0.30 | 0.15 | < .001 | .001 | .061 | |||
| UHR | 0.19 | 0.16 | ||||||||||
| HC | 0.06 | 0.18 | ||||||||||
| Left Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex | -38 +50 +22 | 135 | .023 | FEP | 0.24 | 0.16 | < .001 | < .001 | 1.000 | |||
| UHR | 0.24 | 0.15 | ||||||||||
| HC | 0.08 | 0.14 | ||||||||||
| Right Middle temporal gyrus | +62 +02–20 | 135 | .023 | FEP | 0.00 | 0.19 | < .001 | < .001 | .702 | |||
| UHR | 0.07 | 0.20 | ||||||||||
| HC | 0.24 | 0.19 | ||||||||||
| Left Superior temporal gyrus | -48–44 +06 | 119 | .040 | FEP | 0.20 | 0.16 | < .001 | 1.000 | < .001 | |||
| UHR | 0.39 | 0.18 | ||||||||||
| HC | 0.42 | 0.15 | ||||||||||
| Right Heschl's gyrus | Left Insular cortex | -32–20–06 | 731 | < .001 | FEP | 0.19 | 0.10 | < .001 | .179 | < .001 | ||
| UHR | 0.39 | 0.12 | ||||||||||
| HC | 0.34 | 0.09 | ||||||||||
| Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex | 0 +28 +18 | 136 | .017 | FEP | 0.08 | 0.15 | < .001 | < .001 | 1.000 | |||
| UHR | 0.11 | 0.14 | ||||||||||
| HC | 0.23 | 0.14 | ||||||||||
| Left Heschl's gyrus | Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex | 0 +50–06 | 294 | < .001 | FEP | 0.00 | 0.15 | < .001 | < .001 | .542 | ||
| UHR | 0.05 | 0.12 | ||||||||||
| HC | 0.16 | 0.12 | ||||||||||
| Left Insular cortex | -44–14 +12 | 170 | .006 | FEP | 0.35 | 0.16 | < .001 | 1.000 | < .001 | |||
| UHR | 0.54 | 0.13 | ||||||||||
| HC | 0.55 | 0.15 | ||||||||||
| Left Putamen | -32–16–02 | 151 | .011 | FEP | 0.12 | 0.12 | 1.000 | < .001 | < .001 | |||
| UHR | 0.27 | 0.11 | ||||||||||
| HC | 0.14 | 0.10 | ||||||||||
Note: FWE, family-wise error; FC, functional connectivity; FEP, first-episode psychosis; UHR, ultra-high-risk for psychosis; HC, healthy control
Fig 2Significant difference in functional connectivity among groups.
The differences among individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP), ultra-high-risk for psychosis (UHR), and the healthy controls (HC) were revealed by one-way ANOVA (p < .05, family-wise error rate corrected). Significant differences (presented in yellow) were revealed between the (A) left planum temporale (PT) and right primary motor cortex (PMC); (B) left PT and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC); (C) left PT and left DLPFC; (D) left PT and right middle temporal gyrus (MTG); (E) left PT and left superior temporal gyrus (STG); (F) right Heschl’s gyrus (HG) and left insular cortex (INS); (G) right HG and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC); (H) leftt HG and dACC; (I) left HG and left INS; (J) left HG and left putamen (PUT). The functional connectivity coefficients (mean value) of each region showing significant spatial differences are presented in a bar graph.
Fig 3Associations between functional connectivity strength and symptom severity.
(A) Scatterplot of the correlation between the overall positive symptom severity and altered functional connectivity of the ultra-high-risk for psychosis (UHR) subject group (r = .34, p = .03): Fisher's Z transformed connectivity strength between the left planum temporale (PT)–right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (x axis) and the overall positive symptom scale score of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (y axis). (B) Bar plot of the mean functional connectivity strength (Fisher's Z transformed) of the hallucination group (n = 23) and non-hallucination group (n = 40) among individuals in the FEP and UHR groups (p = .02).