OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine the interrater reliability and predictive validity of a set of diagnostic criteria for the prodrome of the first episode of schizophrenic psychosis when based on the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes. METHOD: The subjects were patients referred for evaluation because of a suspected schizophrenia prodromal syndrome. For the reliability study, two to four raters independently diagnosed 18 patients on the basis of face-to-face or videotaped interviews. For the validity study, 6- and 12-month outcome data were collected for 29 patients. RESULTS: Agreement in differentiating prodromal from nonprodromal patients was 93%. The prodromal features had converted to schizophrenic psychosis for 46% of the prodromal patients at 6 months and for 54% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In small groups of subjects, these diagnostic criteria for the schizophrenic prodrome and the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes showed promising interrater reliability and predictive validity.
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine the interrater reliability and predictive validity of a set of diagnostic criteria for the prodrome of the first episode of schizophrenic psychosis when based on the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes. METHOD: The subjects were patients referred for evaluation because of a suspected schizophrenia prodromal syndrome. For the reliability study, two to four raters independently diagnosed 18 patients on the basis of face-to-face or videotaped interviews. For the validity study, 6- and 12-month outcome data were collected for 29 patients. RESULTS: Agreement in differentiating prodromal from nonprodromal patients was 93%. The prodromal features had converted to schizophrenic psychosis for 46% of the prodromal patients at 6 months and for 54% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In small groups of subjects, these diagnostic criteria for the schizophrenic prodrome and the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes showed promising interrater reliability and predictive validity.
Authors: Elaine F Walker; Patricia A Brennan; Michelle Esterberg; Joy Brasfield; Brad Pearce; Michael T Compton Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2010-05
Authors: Vijay A Mittal; Maria Jalbrzikowski; Melita Daley; Cristina Roman; Carrie E Bearden; Tyrone D Cannon Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Larry J Seidman; Anthony J Giuliano; Eric C Meyer; Jean Addington; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Carrie E Bearden; Bruce K Christensen; Keith Hawkins; Robert Heaton; Richard S E Keefe; Robert Heinssen; Barbara A Cornblatt Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-06
Authors: Joachim Klosterkötter; Stephan Ruhrmann; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Raimo K R Salokangas; Don Linszen; Max Birchwood; Georg Juckel; Anthony Morrison; José Luis Vázquèz-Barquero; Martin Hambrecht; Heinrich VON Reventlow Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Andreas Bechdolf; Lisa J Phillips; Shona M Francey; Steven Leicester; Anthony P Morrison; Verena Veith; Joachim Klosterkötter; Patrick D McGorry Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: M Heinimaa; R K R Salokangas; T Ristkari; M Plathin; J Huttunen; T Ilonen; T Suomela; J Korkeila; T H McGlashan Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2003 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Neeraj Tandon; Debra Montrose; Jai Shah; R P Rajarethinam; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Matcheri S Keshavan Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2011-11-04 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Christoph U Correll; Doreen M Olvet; Andrea M Auther; Marta Hauser; Taishiro Kishimoto; Ricardo E Carrión; Stephanie Snyder; Barbara A Cornblatt Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 6.744