| Literature DB >> 26264413 |
Rong-Chang Zeng1, Xiao-Ting Li1, Shuo-Qi Li1, Fen Zhang1, En-Hou Han2.
Abstract
Magnesium and its alloys are promising biodegradable biomaterials but are still cEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26264413 PMCID: PMC4532994 DOI: 10.1038/srep13026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Corrosion and electrochemical measurements of pure Mg in 0.9% NaCl solutions with different glucose contents.
(a) hydrogen evolution rate. (b) solution pH value. (c) Open-circuit potential. (d) Polarization curves.
Figure 2SEM morphologies and corresponding EDS of pure Mg after immersion in 0.9% NaCl solutions with different contents of glucose for 24 h.
(a) SEM morphologies of pure Mg. (b–d) EDS of pure Mg in 0.9% NaCl solutions without glucose (b), with 2.5% glucose (c) and with 5.0% glucose (d). The EDS was organized by wt.%.
Figure 3XRD patterns of pure Mg after immersion in 0.9% NaCl with different glucose contents for 72 h.
Figure 4XPS analysis of a pure Mg surface after immersion in 0.9% NaCl solutions without and with glucose or mannitol for various periods.
(a,b) The entire range of the binding energy survey (a) and C 1s spectra (b) for sample surfaces after immersion in 0.9% NaCl solutions without and with glucose or mannitol for 2 h. (c,d) C 1s spectra of samples immersed in 0.9% NaCl solutions with mannitol (c) and with glucose (d) for different amounts of time. (e–j) curve fitting of C 1s spectra (e–g) and Mg 2p spectra (h–j) for samples after immersion in 0.9% NaCl solutions with no additive (e,h) and with 5.0% mannitol (f,i) and 5.0% glucose (g,j) for 2 h.
Figure 5Corrosion and electrochemical measurements of pure Mg in Hank’s solutions with different glucose contents.
(a) hydrogen evolution rate. (b) solution pH value. (c) Open-circuit potential. (d) Polarization curves.
Figure 6SEM morphologies (a–f) and corresponding EDS (g–i) of pure Mg after immersion in Hank’s solutions with different glucose contents for 72 h. (a,b and g) 1 g/L. (c,d and h) 2 g/L. (e,f and i) 3 g/L. The EDS was organized by wt.%.
Figure 7XRD patterns of pure Mg after immersion in Hank’s with different glucose contents for 72 h.
Figure 8Schematic illustration of corrosion process of pure magnesium during exposure to 0.9% NaCl solution with glucose.
Figure 9Schematic illustration of corrosion process of pure magnesium during exposure to Hank’s solution with glucose.