BACKGROUND AND AIMS: No endoscopic examination has been able to evaluate severity of ulcerative colitis (UC) by quantification. This prospective study investigated the efficacy of quantifying autofluorescence imaging (AFI) to assess the severity of UC, which captures the fluorescence emitted from intestinal tissue and then quantifies the intensity using an image-analytical software program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven endoscopists separately evaluated 135 images of conventional endoscopy (CE) and AFI from a same lesion. A CE image corresponding to Mayo endoscopic subscore 0 or 1 was defined as being inactive. The fluorescence intensities of AFI were quantified using an image-analytical software program (F index; FI). Active inflammation was defined when Matts' histological grade was 2 or more. A cut-off value of the FI for active inflammation was determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The inter-observer consistency was calculated by unweighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient for the FI was inversely related to the histological severity (r = -0.558, p < 0.0001). The ROC analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value for the FI for active inflammation was 0.906. The average diagnostic accuracy of the FI was significantly higher than those of the CE (84.7 vs 78.5 %, p < 0.01). The kappa values for the inter-observer consistency of CE and the FI were 0.60 and 0.95 in all participants, 0.53 and 0.97 in the less-experienced endoscopists group and 0.67 and 0.93 in the expert group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The quantified AFI is considered to be an accurate and objective indicator that can be used to assess the activity of ulcerative colitis, particularly for less-experienced endoscopists.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: No endoscopic examination has been able to evaluate severity of ulcerative colitis (UC) by quantification. This prospective study investigated the efficacy of quantifying autofluorescence imaging (AFI) to assess the severity of UC, which captures the fluorescence emitted from intestinal tissue and then quantifies the intensity using an image-analytical software program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven endoscopists separately evaluated 135 images of conventional endoscopy (CE) and AFI from a same lesion. A CE image corresponding to Mayo endoscopic subscore 0 or 1 was defined as being inactive. The fluorescence intensities of AFI were quantified using an image-analytical software program (F index; FI). Active inflammation was defined when Matts' histological grade was 2 or more. A cut-off value of the FI for active inflammation was determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The inter-observer consistency was calculated by unweighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient for the FI was inversely related to the histological severity (r = -0.558, p < 0.0001). The ROC analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value for the FI for active inflammation was 0.906. The average diagnostic accuracy of the FI was significantly higher than those of the CE (84.7 vs 78.5 %, p < 0.01). The kappa values for the inter-observer consistency of CE and the FI were 0.60 and 0.95 in all participants, 0.53 and 0.97 in the less-experienced endoscopists group and 0.67 and 0.93 in the expert group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The quantified AFI is considered to be an accurate and objective indicator that can be used to assess the activity of ulcerative colitis, particularly for less-experienced endoscopists.
Authors: Kelvin T Thia; Edward V Loftus; Darrell S Pardi; Sunanda V Kane; William A Faubion; William J Tremaine; Kenneth W Schroeder; Scott W Harmsen; Alan R Zinsmeister; William J Sandborn Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2010-09-27 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Geert D'Haens; William J Sandborn; Brian G Feagan; Karel Geboes; Stephen B Hanauer; E Jan Irvine; Marc Lémann; Philippe Marteau; Paul Rutgeerts; Jurgen Schölmerich; Lloyd R Sutherland Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Bart Lemmens; Ingrid Arijs; Gert Van Assche; Xavier Sagaert; Karel Geboes; Marc Ferrante; Paul Rutgeerts; Séverine Vermeire; Gert De Hertogh Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Gerard Cummins; Benjamin F Cox; Gastone Ciuti; Thineskrishna Anbarasan; Marc P Y Desmulliez; Sandy Cochran; Robert Steele; John N Plevris; Anastasios Koulaouzidis Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Jonas Wizenty; Teresa Schumann; Donna Theil; Martin Stockmann; Johann Pratschke; Frank Tacke; Felix Aigner; Tilo Wuensch Journal: Molecules Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: Gheorghe Hundorfean; Stephen P Pereira; John G Karstensen; Peter Vilmann; Adrian Saftoiu Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 2.260