BACKGROUND: Endoscopic evaluation plays a pivotal role in the assessment of treatment response in ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to determine the interobserver agreement (IOA) for assessment of mucosal lesions, and to determine lesions predictive of global assessment of endoscopic severity (GAES). METHODS: Fifty-one UC patients had digital videorecording of their colonoscopic examinations, edited into videoclips representative of five colonic segments (rectum, sigmoid, descending, transverse, ascending/cecum). Seven gastroenterologists specializing in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) independently and blindly rated individual lesions and endoscopic severity for each segment and globally. Edema, erythema, stricture, loss of haustral folds, rigidity, and pseudopolyps were scored as absent or present while vascular pattern, granularity, ulceration, and bleeding-friability were scored using a predefined severity scale. The GAES was based on a 4-point scale and a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). The IOA among raters was estimated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Strength of agreement was categorized as excellent (0.81-1.00), good (0.61-0.80), moderate (0.41-0.60), and fair (0.21-0.40). Linear regression analysis was used to identify lesions predictive of overall endoscopic severity and develop a scoring system for clinical use. RESULTS: Granularity, vascular pattern, ulceration, bleeding/friability, and pseudopolyps had good IOA in most segments. There was excellent agreement for VAS and good agreement for GAES and the VAS was significantly associated with GAES (P < 0.001). Granularity, vascular pattern, ulceration, and bleeding-friability were significant predictors of overall endoscopic severity. CONCLUSIONS: Granularity, vascular pattern, ulceration, and bleeding-friability demonstrated good reproducibility and were predictors of the GAES in UC patients.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic evaluation plays a pivotal role in the assessment of treatment response in ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to determine the interobserver agreement (IOA) for assessment of mucosal lesions, and to determine lesions predictive of global assessment of endoscopic severity (GAES). METHODS: Fifty-one UC patients had digital videorecording of their colonoscopic examinations, edited into videoclips representative of five colonic segments (rectum, sigmoid, descending, transverse, ascending/cecum). Seven gastroenterologists specializing in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) independently and blindly rated individual lesions and endoscopic severity for each segment and globally. Edema, erythema, stricture, loss of haustral folds, rigidity, and pseudopolyps were scored as absent or present while vascular pattern, granularity, ulceration, and bleeding-friability were scored using a predefined severity scale. The GAES was based on a 4-point scale and a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). The IOA among raters was estimated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Strength of agreement was categorized as excellent (0.81-1.00), good (0.61-0.80), moderate (0.41-0.60), and fair (0.21-0.40). Linear regression analysis was used to identify lesions predictive of overall endoscopic severity and develop a scoring system for clinical use. RESULTS: Granularity, vascular pattern, ulceration, bleeding/friability, and pseudopolyps had good IOA in most segments. There was excellent agreement for VAS and good agreement for GAES and the VAS was significantly associated with GAES (P < 0.001). Granularity, vascular pattern, ulceration, and bleeding-friability were significant predictors of overall endoscopic severity. CONCLUSIONS: Granularity, vascular pattern, ulceration, and bleeding-friability demonstrated good reproducibility and were predictors of the GAES in UC patients.
Authors: Christopher Andrew Lamb; Nicholas A Kennedy; Tim Raine; Philip Anthony Hendy; Philip J Smith; Jimmy K Limdi; Bu'Hussain Hayee; Miranda C E Lomer; Gareth C Parkes; Christian Selinger; Kevin J Barrett; R Justin Davies; Cathy Bennett; Stuart Gittens; Malcolm G Dunlop; Omar Faiz; Aileen Fraser; Vikki Garrick; Paul D Johnston; Miles Parkes; Jeremy Sanderson; Helen Terry; Daniel R Gaya; Tariq H Iqbal; Stuart A Taylor; Melissa Smith; Matthew Brookes; Richard Hansen; A Barney Hawthorne Journal: Gut Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Samantha Conley; Deborah D Proctor; Sangchoon Jeon; Robert S Sandler; Nancy S Redeker Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: L Peyrin-Biroulet; W Sandborn; B E Sands; W Reinisch; W Bemelman; R V Bryant; G D'Haens; I Dotan; M Dubinsky; B Feagan; G Fiorino; R Gearry; S Krishnareddy; P L Lakatos; E V Loftus; P Marteau; P Munkholm; T B Murdoch; I Ordás; R Panaccione; R H Riddell; J Ruel; D T Rubin; M Samaan; C A Siegel; M S Silverberg; J Stoker; S Schreiber; S Travis; G Van Assche; S Danese; J Panes; G Bouguen; S O'Donnell; B Pariente; S Winer; S Hanauer; J-F Colombel Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Balakrishnan S Ramakrishna; Govind K Makharia; Philip Abraham; Uday C Ghoshal; Venkataraman Jayanthi; Brij Kishore Agarwal; Vineet Ahuja; Deepak K Bhasin; Shobna J Bhatia; Gourdas Choudhuri; Sunil Dadhich; Devendra C Desai; Gopal Krishna Dhali; Bhaba Dev Goswami; Sanjeev K Issar; Ajay K Jain; Rakesh Kochhar; Ajay Kumar; Goundappa Loganathan; Sri Prakash Misra; C Ganesh Pai; Sujoy Pal; Anna Pulimood; Amarender S Puri; Ganesh N Ramesh; Gautam Ray; Shivaram P Singh; Ajit Sood; Manu Tandan Journal: Indian J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-10-25
Authors: Simon P L Travis; Dan Schnell; Brian G Feagan; Maria T Abreu; Douglas G Altman; Stephen B Hanauer; Piotr Krzeski; Gary R Lichtenstein; Philippe R Marteau; Jean-Yves Mary; Walter Reinisch; Bruce E Sands; Patrick Schnell; Bruce R Yacyshyn; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Christian A Bernhardt; William J Sandborn Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 9.071