AIM: To investigate whether autofluorescence imaging (AFI) endoscopy can distinguish non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) from functional heartburn (FH). METHODS: In this prospective observational trial, 127 patients presenting with typical reflux symptoms for > 6 mo were screened. All the participants underwent endoscopy, during which white light imaging (WLI) was followed by AFI. Finally 84 patients with normal esophageal appearance on WLI were enrolled. It was defined as being suggestive of NERD if one or more longitudinal purple lines longer than one centimeter were visualized in the distal part of the esophagus during AFI endoscopy. Ambulatory 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring was also performed. After standard proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) tests, subjects were divided into an NERD group and an FH group and the diagnostic performance of AFI endoscopy to differentiate NERD from FH was evaluated. RESULTS: Of 84 endoscopy-negative patients, 36 (42.9%) had a normal pH/impedance test. Of these, 26 patients with favorable responses to PPI tests were classified as having NERD. Finally 10 patients were diagnosed with FH and the others with NERD. Altogether, 68 (81.0%) of the 84 patients were positive on AFI endoscopy. In the NERD group, there were 67 (90.5%) patients with abnormal esophageal findings on AFI endoscopy while only 1 (10%) patient was positive on AFI endoscopy in the FH group. The sensitivity and specificity of AFI in differentiating NERD from FH were 90.5% (95%CI: 81.5%-96.1%) and 90.0% (95%CI: 55.5%-99.7%), respectively. Meanwhile, the accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of AFI in differentiating between NERD and FH were 90.5% (95%CI: 84.2%-96.8%), 98.5% (95%CI: 92.1%-99.9%) and 56.3% (95%CI: 30.0%-80.2%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Autofluorescence imaging may serve as a complementary method in evaluating patients with NERD and FH.
AIM: To investigate whether autofluorescence imaging (AFI) endoscopy can distinguish non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) from functional heartburn (FH). METHODS: In this prospective observational trial, 127 patients presenting with typical reflux symptoms for > 6 mo were screened. All the participants underwent endoscopy, during which white light imaging (WLI) was followed by AFI. Finally 84 patients with normal esophageal appearance on WLI were enrolled. It was defined as being suggestive of NERD if one or more longitudinal purple lines longer than one centimeter were visualized in the distal part of the esophagus during AFI endoscopy. Ambulatory 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring was also performed. After standard proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) tests, subjects were divided into an NERD group and an FH group and the diagnostic performance of AFI endoscopy to differentiate NERD from FH was evaluated. RESULTS: Of 84 endoscopy-negative patients, 36 (42.9%) had a normal pH/impedance test. Of these, 26 patients with favorable responses to PPI tests were classified as having NERD. Finally 10 patients were diagnosed with FH and the others with NERD. Altogether, 68 (81.0%) of the 84 patients were positive on AFI endoscopy. In the NERD group, there were 67 (90.5%) patients with abnormal esophageal findings on AFI endoscopy while only 1 (10%) patient was positive on AFI endoscopy in the FH group. The sensitivity and specificity of AFI in differentiating NERD from FH were 90.5% (95%CI: 81.5%-96.1%) and 90.0% (95%CI: 55.5%-99.7%), respectively. Meanwhile, the accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of AFI in differentiating between NERD and FH were 90.5% (95%CI: 84.2%-96.8%), 98.5% (95%CI: 92.1%-99.9%) and 56.3% (95%CI: 30.0%-80.2%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Autofluorescence imaging may serve as a complementary method in evaluating patients with NERD and FH.
Authors: Louis-Michel Wong Kee Song; Subhas Banerjee; David Desilets; David L Diehl; Francis A Farraye; Vivek Kaul; Sripathi R Kethu; Richard S Kwon; Petar Mamula; Marcos C Pedrosa; Sarah A Rodriguez; William M Tierney Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Edoardo Savarino; Radu Tutuian; Patrizia Zentilin; Pietro Dulbecco; Daniel Pohl; Elisa Marabotto; Andrea Parodi; Giorgio Sammito; Lorenzo Gemignani; Giorgia Bodini; Vincenzo Savarino Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-12-08 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Jean Paul Galmiche; Ray E Clouse; András Bálint; Ian J Cook; Peter J Kahrilas; William G Paterson; Andre J P M Smout Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: F J C van den Broek; P Fockens; S van Eeden; J B Reitsma; J C H Hardwick; P C F Stokkers; E Dekker Journal: Gut Date: 2008-03-26 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Jonas Wizenty; Teresa Schumann; Donna Theil; Martin Stockmann; Johann Pratschke; Frank Tacke; Felix Aigner; Tilo Wuensch Journal: Molecules Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 4.411