| Literature DB >> 26263992 |
Kin-Fong Lei1,2, Yi-Zheng Hsieh3, Yi-Yuan Chiu4, Min-Hsien Wu5.
Abstract
This study reports a piezoelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) polymer-based sensor patch for respiration detections in dynamic walking condition. The working mechanism of respiration signal generation is based on the periodical deformations on a human chest wall during the respiratory movements, which in turn mechanically stretch the piezoelectric PVDF film to generate the corresponding electrical signals. In this study, the PVDF sensing film was completely encapsulated within the sensor patch forming a mass-spring-damper mechanical system to prevent the noises generated in a dynamic condition. To verify the design of sensor patch to prevent dynamic noises, experimental investigations were carried out. Results demonstrated the respiration signals generated and the respiratory rates measured by the proposed sensor patch were in line with the same measurements based on a commercial respiratory effort transducer both in a static (e.g., sitting) or dynamic (e.g., walking) condition. As a whole, this study has developed a PVDF-based sensor patch which is capable of monitoring respirations in a dynamic walking condition with high fidelity. Other distinctive features include its small size, light weight, ease of use, low cost, and portability. All these make it a promising sensing device to monitor respirations particularly in home care units.Entities:
Keywords: dynamic condition; poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF); respirations; sensors, patch
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26263992 PMCID: PMC4570346 DOI: 10.3390/s150818801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) Schematic illustrations of the structure of sensor patch, and (b) the photograph of sensor patch (upper right).
Figure 2(a) Schematic illustration of the working mechanism of sensor patch: (I) the rest state; (II) the mechanical stretch of sensor patch due to the deformations on the chest wall of human body during the physiological movements of respirations; (b) the illustration of overall experimental setup.
Figure 3Comparison of the electrical signals acquired from the previously-reported sensor patch, and a commercial respiratory effort transducer under (RET) (a) static (sitting), and (b) dynamic (walking) conditions.
Figure 4Comparison of the electrical signals acquired from the proposed sensor patch, and a commercial respiratory effort transducer (RET) under (a) static (sitting), and (b) dynamic (walking) conditions.
Comparison of the respiration rates measured by the proposed sensor patch, and commercial respiratory effort transducer (RET) under static (sitting) and dynamic (walking) conditions; unit: times·min−1.
| Sex | Age | Static Condition | Dynamic Condition | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensor Patch | RET | Sensor Patch | RET | ||
| M | 23 | 7.78 ± 0.38 | 7.78 ± 0.38 | 9.34 ± 0 | 9.34 ± 0 |
| F | 23 | 11.33 ± 0.67 | 11.33 ± 0.67 | 12.44 ± 0.77 | 12.44 ± 0.77 |
| M | 24 | 15.11 ± 0.38 | 15.11 ± 0.39 | 18.22 ± 0.38 | 18.22 ± 0.38 |
| F | 24 | 9.11 ± 0.39 | 9.11 ± 0.39 | 10.22 ± 0.38 | 10.22 ± 0.38 |