| Literature DB >> 29911296 |
Benjamin Owen1, Nicholas Bojdo2, Andrey Jivkov2, Bernard Keavney3, Alistair Revell2.
Abstract
Computational modelling of the cardiovascular system offers much promise, but represents a truly interdisciplinary challenge, requiring knowledge of physiology, mechanics of materials, fluid dynamics and biochemistry. This paper aims to provide a summary of the recent advances in cardiovascular structural modelling, including the numerical methods, main constitutive models and modelling procedures developed to represent cardiovascular structures and pathologies across a broad range of length and timescales; serving as an accessible point of reference to newcomers to the field. The class of so-called hyperelastic materials provides the theoretical foundation for the modelling of how these materials deform under load, and so an overview of these models is provided; comparing classical to application-specific phenomenological models. The physiology is split into components and pathologies of the cardiovascular system and linked back to constitutive modelling developments, identifying current state of the art in modelling procedures from both clinical and engineering sources. Models which have originally been derived for one application and scale are shown to be used for an increasing range and for similar applications. The trend for such approaches is discussed in the context of increasing availability of high performance computing resources, where in some cases computer hardware can impact the choice of modelling approach used.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular structure; Continuum; Discrete; Modelling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29911296 PMCID: PMC6154127 DOI: 10.1007/s10237-018-1024-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomech Model Mechanobiol ISSN: 1617-7940
Fig. 1Structural models used in vascular applications with popular material models and discretisation methods, classified with respect to length scale and the applications to which they have been applied. Hashed lines indicate scales where material models have been used but not commonly
Strain energy distribution functions for a selection of major material models used in cardiovascular structural modelling: a brief description of each is provided with the original target application
| Neo-Hookean (simple hyperelasticity) | Linear elasticity and the neo-Hookean model provide similar deformation profiles at small strains. However, for larger strains the neo-Hookean model provides increasingly better description of deformation and is shown to be suitable where strains are up to 20% (Gent |
| Mooney–Rivlin (incompressible) | The incompressible Mooney–Rivlin model contains an additional term dependent on the second invariant of the deformation tensors. Originally developed for rubber-like materials, it has been used as a simple representation of many cardiovascular structures across a number of scales, especially in scenarios where the deformation of healthy tissue may not be of primary concern, e.g. the development of various diseases. Second-order formulations have also been used for a number of applications |
| Abdominal aortic aneurysm model |
Raghavan and Vorp ( |
| Fung-type anisotropic coronary artery model |
Holzapfel et al. ( |
| Fung-type viscoelastic anisotropic myocardium model |
Cansız et al. ( |
| Red blood cell model | Skalak et al. developed a 2D stored energy potential for RBC membranes (Skalak et al. |
| redefined |
Fig. 2Two discrete particles connected via spring-dashpot system for normal (n) and tangential (t) components of bond deformation. Variations of the method can neglect damping but may use nonlinear springs to better represent the properties of a given material. Similar models can also be used for contact dynamics between distinct bodies that collide
Fig. 3Stress–stretch profiles for some commonly implemented material models for small deformations (inset left) and large deformations (left). Each model can be adjusted through varying constants in the strain energy distribution function given in Table 1 (middle). Each is adapted via a least-squares regression algorithm and compared to the Raghavan stress–stretch profile, whose coefficients have been fitted to experimental results (Raghavan and Vorp 2000) (right)
Fig. 4Overview of cardiovascular applications included within this review: applications are classified within each subheading in Sect. 4, and an basic description of the physiology of the application is given in each case. Previously published reviews that are specific to a given application are highlighted for each classification
Fig. 5A discrete element method approach to modelling human atrial tissue using clumping of particles to create cells. Clumps are treated as rigid during each timestep, therefore the position and velocity of a clump is affected by surrounding clumps. The deformation of a single clump is modified prior to each timestep according to the electrical and mechanical behaviour of a single cell. Simulation results were able to capture local effects caused by varying cell alignment within the tissue (Brocklehurst et al. 2015)
Fig. 6Idealised venous valve study using a vector-based discrete element method as structural solver for flexible leaflets (top right). Deformation profile of the valve compared favourably with experimental observations and was able to match opening, equilibrium and closing phases of the valve cycle (top left). One example of a discrete element method implemented at large cardiovascular length scale (Nasar 2016)
Fig. 7Comparison of a linear elastic and b nonlinear elastic constitutive relationships for the total deformation magnitude of a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm. Profiles are qualitatively similar demonstrating the capability of linear elastic models given the easier implementation. However, the magnitude of maximum displacement of the nonlinear model was found to be 36% lower than the linear elastic model highlighting that for high-fidelity studies, nonlinear models should be used and the high significance of the constitutive model implemented (Torii et al. 2008)
Fig. 8Coarse-grained worm-like chain model (discrete) representation of multiple RBCs subjected to various flow conditions. Method reproduced disc, parachute and slipper shapes observed experimentally (left) when flow velocity and fluid density were modified (right) (Fedosov et al. 2014b)
Fig. 9Timeline of a selected major studies published progressing the state of the art of cardiovascular structural modelling. Key features of each study are highlighted including the inclusion of patient-specific geometries and fluid–structure interaction methods