Literature DB >> 26259051

Performance-Based Versus Self-Reported Outcomes Using the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Michael R Dayton1, Dana L Judd, Craig A Hogan, Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between patients' self-reported and performance-based function after total hip arthroplasty (THA).
DESIGN: Twenty-three patients (age, 61.4 ± 8.3 yrs) undergoing primary THA for hip osteoarthritis participated. Self-reported function and recovery was measured using the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score activities of daily living and pain subscales. Performance-based functional measures included the timed up and go test, the stair climbing test, and the 6-minute walk test. Outcome measures were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 and 6 mos.
RESULTS: One month after THA, performance-based function declined compared with baseline as follows: timed up and go test, -22.1% ± 25.4%; stair climbing test, -58.5% ± 63.6%; and 6-minute walk test, -22.6% ± 31.7%. In contrast, self-reported function on the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living significantly improved 1 mo after THA compared with baseline: 40.8% ± 33.3%. One to 6 mos after THA, there were significant improvements in timed up and go test, stair climbing test, and 6-minute walk test, which paralleled improvements on the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, although changes were not significantly correlated.
CONCLUSION: The disparity between changes in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores and functional performance postoperatively suggests that patients may overestimate their functional capacity early after THA, likely in response to pain improvements over the same time period. Therefore, outcomes assessment after THA should include both self-report and performance-based functional measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26259051      PMCID: PMC4772958          DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  24 in total

1.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Comparison of the responsiveness of the SF-36 and WOMAC in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nelson Fong Soohoo; Raj M Vyas; David B Samimi; Ricardo Molina; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Comparison of gender and group differences in self-report and physical performance measures in total hip and knee arthroplasty candidates.

Authors:  Deborah Kennedy; Paul W Stratford; Sonia M C Pagura; Marianne Walsh; Linda J Woodhouse
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Comparison of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) osteoarthritis index and a self-report format of the self-administered Lequesne-Algofunctional index in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G Stucki; O Sangha; S Stucki; B A Michel; A Tyndall; W Dick; R Theiler
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan; C H Goldsmith; J Campbell; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Acetabular fractures converted to total hip arthroplasties in the elderly: how does function compare to primary total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Erik Schnaser; Nicholas R Scarcella; Heather A Vallier
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Functional ability perceived by individuals following total knee arthroplasty compared to age-matched individuals without knee disability.

Authors:  E Finch; M Walsh; S G Thomas; L J Woodhouse
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 8.  The impact of osteoarthritis: implications for research.

Authors:  Joseph A Buckwalter; Charles Saltzman; Thomas Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Assessing activity in joint replacement patients.

Authors:  C A Zahiri; T P Schmalzried; E S Szuszczewicz; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Anna K Nilsdotter; L Stefan Lohmander; Maria Klässbo; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  How New Technology Is Improving Physical Therapy.

Authors:  Johnny G Owens; Michelle R Rauzi; Andrew Kittelson; Jeremy Graber; Michael J Bade; Julia Johnson; Dustin Nabhan
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-04

2.  Limited benefits of the direct anterior approach in primary hip arthroplasty: A prospective single centre cohort study.

Authors:  Jetse Jelsma; Rik Pijnenburg; Harm W Boons; Peter J M G Eggen; Lucas L A Kleijn; Herman Lacroix; Hub J Noten
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-10-26

3.  Step Length Asymmetry and Its Associations With Mechanical Energy Exchange, Function, and Fatigue After Total Hip Replacement.

Authors:  Chun-Hao Huang; Kharma C Foucher
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Person-Centered Care and Physical Therapy: A "People-Like-Me" Approach.

Authors:  Andrew J Kittelson; Thomas J Hoogeboom; Margaret Schenkman; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Nico L U van Meeteren
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2020-01-23

Review 5.  Therapeutic ultrasound for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis with grade quality assessment.

Authors:  Lucas Ogura Dantas; Mikala C Osani; Raveendhara R Bannuru
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  The Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation as a Supplement to Rehabilitation in Patients After Total Knee or Hip Replacement: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sarah Eichler; Annett Salzwedel; Sophie Rabe; Steffen Mueller; Frank Mayer; Monique Wochatz; Miralem Hadzic; Michael John; Karl Wegscheider; Heinz Völler
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2019-11-07

7.  Predicting short stay total hip arthroplasty by use of the timed up and go-test.

Authors:  Ellen Oosting; Paul J C Kapitein; Suzan V de Vries; Ellen Breedveld
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Physical Performance Tests Correlate With Patient-reported Outcomes After Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Scott; Michael C Willey; John C Davison; Robert W Westermann; Amanda C Paulson; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-06-08

9.  A Protocol of Pose Avoidance in Place of Hip Precautions After Posterior-Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty May Not Increase Risk of Post-operative Dislocation.

Authors:  Erica Fritz Eannucci; Brian T Barlow; Kaitlin M Carroll; Peter K Sculco; Seth A Jerabek; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-08-05

Review 10.  Objectively Measured Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior and Functional Performance before and after Lower Limb Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Matic Sašek; Žiga Kozinc; Stefan Löfler; Christian Hofer; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.