Literature DB >> 32162144

How New Technology Is Improving Physical Therapy.

Johnny G Owens1, Michelle R Rauzi2, Andrew Kittelson2, Jeremy Graber2, Michael J Bade2,3, Julia Johnson4,5, Dustin Nabhan4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As rehabilitation patient volume across the age spectrum increases and reimbursement rates decrease, clinicians are forced to produce favorable outcomes with limited resources and time. The purpose of this review is to highlight new technologies being utilized to improve standardization and outcomes for patients rehabilitating orthopedic injuries ranging from sports medicine to trauma to joint arthroplasty. RECENT
FINDINGS: A proliferation of new technologies in rehabilitation has recently occurred with the hope of improved outcomes, better patient compliance and safety, and return to athletic performance. These include technologies applied directly to the patient such as exoskeletons and instrumented insoles to extrinsic applications such as biofeedback and personalized reference charts. Well-structured randomized trials are ongoing centered around the efficacy and safety of these new technologies to help guide clinical necessity and appropriate application. We present a range of new technologies that may assist a diverse population of orthopedic conditions. Many of these interventions are already supported by level 1 evidence and appear safe and feasible for most clinical settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofeedback; Blood flow restriction; Exoskeleton; Instrumented insoles; Musculoskeletal ultrasound; Patient-centered care

Year:  2020        PMID: 32162144      PMCID: PMC7174486          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-020-09610-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  87 in total

1.  Collaborative Establishment of an Integrated Orthotic and Rehabilitation Pathway.

Authors:  Dionisio Ortiz; James A Blair; David M Dromsky; Jay Pyo; Johnny G Owens; Joseph R Hsu
Journal:  J Surg Orthop Adv       Date:  2015

2.  Informed, Patient-Centered Decisions Associated with Better Health Outcomes in Orthopedics: Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Karen R Sepucha; Steven J Atlas; Yuchiao Chang; Andrew Freiberg; Henrik Malchau; Mahima Mangla; Harry Rubash; Leigh H Simmons; Thomas Cha
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Biomechanical response to ankle-foot orthosis stiffness during running.

Authors:  Elizabeth Russell Esposito; Harmony S Choi; Johnny G Owens; Ryan V Blanck; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  The effect of total knee replacement on dynamic support of the body during walking and stair ascent.

Authors:  David Mandeville; Louis R Osternig; Li-Shan Chou
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Contributions of Second Opinions, Outcome Forecasts, and Testimonials to Patient Decisions about Knee Replacement Surgery.

Authors:  Susanne Hoffmann; Francis G Caro; Alison S Gottlieb; Iris Kesternich; Joachim K Winter
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Technique for Measuring Limb Occlusion Pressure that Facilitates Personalized Tourniquet Systems: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Bassam A Masri; Brian Day; Alastair S E Younger; Jeswin Jeyasurya
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 1.553

7.  COMplex Fracture Orthopedic Rehabilitation (COMFORT) - Real-time visual biofeedback on weight bearing versus standard training methods in the treatment of proximal femur fractures in the elderly: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marco Raaben; Syaiful Redzwan; Robin Augustine; Taco Johan Blokhuis
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Blood Flow Restriction Only Increases Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis with Exercise.

Authors:  Jean Nyakayiru; Cas J Fuchs; Jorn Trommelen; Joey S J Smeets; Joan M Senden; Annemie P Gijsen; Antoine H Zorenc; Luc J C VAN Loon; Lex B Verdijk
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 9.  Scoping review of patient-centered care approaches in healthcare.

Authors:  Marissa K Constand; Joy C MacDermid; Vanina Dal Bello-Haas; Mary Law
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  How outcome prediction could affect patient decision making in knee replacements: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Timothy Barlow; Patricia Scott; Damian Griffin; Alba Realpe
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  3 in total

1.  Critical review on applications and roles of exoskeletons in patient handling.

Authors:  Liying Zheng; Ashley L Hawke; Kimeran Evans
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.884

2.  Total Knee Arthroplasty Assessments Should Include Strength and Performance-Based Functional Tests to Complement Range-of-Motion and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Jacob J Capin; Michael J Bade; Jason M Jennings; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2022-06-03

3.  Recommendations for return to sports after total hip arthroplasty are becoming less restrictive as implants improve.

Authors:  T Vu-Han; S Hardt; R Ascherl; C Gwinner; C Perka
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.067

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.