Jayant M Pinto1, Kristen E Wroblewski2, David W Kern3, L Philip Schumm2, Martha K McClintock3. 1. Section of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, jpinto@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, and. 3. Department of Comparative Human Development and Institute for Mind and Biology, The University of Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Age-related olfactory loss (presbyosmia) is a prevalent sensory impairment with a large public health impact. In cross-sectional analyses, we found striking health disparities in olfactory function among older U.S. adults. Here, we report a 5-year follow-up to determine the magnitude of within-person olfactory decline. METHODS: The National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) interviewed a probability sample of home-dwelling older U.S. adults (57-85 years) in 2005-2006 (Wave 1) and reinterviewed them in 2010-2011 (Wave 2), assessing demographics, social life, and health, including olfaction. Odor identification was measured with a 5-item version of the Sniffin' Sticks (0-5 correct). Fourteen hundred and thirty-six respondents provided olfaction data in both waves. Multivariate linear and logistic regression were used to model the association between change in olfactory performance and demographic, health, and psychosocial factors. RESULTS: Odor identification declined most rapidly among older individuals (0.25 additional errors per 5 years for each decade of age, p < .001) and in men (0.17 additional errors per 5 years compared to women, p = .005). Among those with perfect scores in Wave 1, African Americans declined more rapidly than Whites (p = .04). Neither socioeconomic status, health conditions, cognition, mental health, alcohol use nor smoking was associated with change in olfaction (p > .05, all). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of olfactory decline increases with age and is greater among men than women despite adjusting for differences in psychosocial and health conditions, indicating physiologic factors as drivers. African Americans are more likely to experience initial olfactory decline, consistent with an earlier onset of aging among this subgroup.
BACKGROUND: Age-related olfactory loss (presbyosmia) is a prevalent sensory impairment with a large public health impact. In cross-sectional analyses, we found striking health disparities in olfactory function among older U.S. adults. Here, we report a 5-year follow-up to determine the magnitude of within-person olfactory decline. METHODS: The National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) interviewed a probability sample of home-dwelling older U.S. adults (57-85 years) in 2005-2006 (Wave 1) and reinterviewed them in 2010-2011 (Wave 2), assessing demographics, social life, and health, including olfaction. Odor identification was measured with a 5-item version of the Sniffin' Sticks (0-5 correct). Fourteen hundred and thirty-six respondents provided olfaction data in both waves. Multivariate linear and logistic regression were used to model the association between change in olfactory performance and demographic, health, and psychosocial factors. RESULTS: Odor identification declined most rapidly among older individuals (0.25 additional errors per 5 years for each decade of age, p < .001) and in men (0.17 additional errors per 5 years compared to women, p = .005). Among those with perfect scores in Wave 1, African Americans declined more rapidly than Whites (p = .04). Neither socioeconomic status, health conditions, cognition, mental health, alcohol use nor smoking was associated with change in olfaction (p > .05, all). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of olfactory decline increases with age and is greater among men than women despite adjusting for differences in psychosocial and health conditions, indicating physiologic factors as drivers. African Americans are more likely to experience initial olfactory decline, consistent with an earlier onset of aging among this subgroup.
Authors: L Philip Schumm; Martha McClintock; Sharon Williams; Sara Leitsch; Johan Lundstrom; Thomas Hummel; Stacy Tessler Lindau Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Lida Katsimpardi; Nadia K Litterman; Pamela A Schein; Christine M Miller; Francesco S Loffredo; Gregory R Wojtkiewicz; John W Chen; Richard T Lee; Amy J Wagers; Lee L Rubin Journal: Science Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jonathan A C Sterne; Ian R White; John B Carlin; Michael Spratt; Patrick Royston; Michael G Kenward; Angela M Wood; James R Carpenter Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-06-29
Authors: Darren M Lipnicki; Perminder S Sachdev; John Crawford; Simone Reppermund; Nicole A Kochan; Julian N Trollor; Brian Draper; Melissa J Slavin; Kristan Kang; Ora Lux; Karen A Mather; Henry Brodaty Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jesse K Siegel; Kristen E Wroblewski; Martha K McClintock; Jayant M Pinto Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Sukriti Nag; Lei Yu; Veronique G VanderHorst; Julie A Schneider; David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman; Robert S Wilson Journal: J Neurol Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: A G Hirsch; W F Stewart; A S Sundaresan; A J Young; T L Kennedy; J Scott Greene; W Feng; B K Tan; R P Schleimer; R C Kern; A Lidder; B S Schwartz Journal: Allergy Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 13.146
Authors: V Eloesa McSorley; Jayant Pinto; L Philip Schumm; Kristen Wroblewski; David Kern; Martha McClintock; Diane S Lauderdale Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Rodney J Schlosser; Timothy L Smith; Jess C Mace; Jeremiah Alt; Daniel M Beswick; Jose L Mattos; Spencer Payne; Vijay R Ramakrishnan; Zachary M Soler Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 3.858