| Literature DB >> 26253816 |
Chenfei Gao1, Zhanguo Gao2, Frank L Greenway3, Jeffrey H Burton4, William D Johnson4, Michael J Keenan1, Frederick M Enright5, Roy J Martin6, YiFang Chu7, Jolene Zheng8.
Abstract
In addition to their fermentable dietary fiber and the soluble β-glucan fiber, oats have unique avenanthramides that have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties that reduce coronary heart disease in human clinical trials. We hypothesized that oat consumption will increase insulin sensitivity, reduce body fat, and improve health span in Caenorhabditis elegans through a mechanism involving the daf-2 gene, which codes for the insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1-like receptor, and that hyperglycemia will attenuate these changes. Caenorhabditis elegans wild type (N2) and the null strains sir-2.1, daf-16, and daf-16/daf-2 were fed Escherichia coli (OP50) and oat flakes (0.5%, 1.0%, or 3%) with and without 2% glucose. Oat feeding decreased intestinal fat deposition in N2, daf-16, or daf-16/daf-2 strains (P < .05); and glucose did not affect intestinal fat deposition response. The N2, daf-16, or sir-2.1 mutant increased the pharyngeal pumping rate (P < .05), a surrogate marker of life span, following oat consumption. Oat consumption increased ckr-1, gcy-8, cpt-1, and cpt-2 mRNA expression in both the N2 and the sir-2.1 mutant, with significantly higher expression in sir-2.1 than in N2 (P < .01). Additional glucose further increased expression 1.5-fold of the 4 genes in N2 (P < .01), decreased the expression of all except cpt-1 in the daf-16 mutant, and reduced mRNA expression of the 4 genes in the daf-16/daf-2 mutant (P < .01). These data suggest that oat consumption reduced fat storage and increased ckr-1, gcy-8, cpt-1, or cpt-2 through the sir-2.1 genetic pathway. Oat consumption may be a beneficial dietary intervention for reducing fat accumulation, augmenting health span, and improving hyperglycemia-impaired lipid metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: C elegans model; Health span; Insulin sensitivity; Lipid metabolism; Oats
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26253816 PMCID: PMC4561582 DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2015.06.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Res ISSN: 0271-5317 Impact factor: 3.315
Information on C elegans strains
| Strains | Gene deficient | Human homologs | Functions | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild type (N2) | – | – | – | [ |
| Forkhead box protein O (FOXO) | [ | |||
| FOXO and insulin/IGF-1 receptor | The | [ | ||
| NAD-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-1 | The | [ |
Composition of oats (Quaker® Oats)
| Content | Quantity (%) | Content | Quantity (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.6 | Ave 2c | 5.4 | |
| Insoluble dietary fiber | 7.3 | Ave 2f | 8.8 |
| Starch | 60.9 | Ave 2p | 5.3 |
| Protein | 13 | Ave 5p | 1.2 |
| Lipids | 6.6 | Ave total | 20.8 |
| Moisture | 10.3 |
Protocol of experiment
| Treatments (50 | Dosage (%)
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without glucose | Without glucose | |||||||
| 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 3 | |
| OP50 (2 × 109 cfu/mL, | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Oats (5%, | 0 | 5 | 10 | 30 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 30 |
| Glucose (50%, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Diet ingredient composition
| Nutrients | Oat diet (mg/mL) | OP50 (mg/mL) | Oat treatment (mg/plate)
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.5% | 1% | 3% | |||
| 0.046 | – | 0.000 | 0.012 | 0.023 | 0.069 | |
| Insoluble dietary fiber | 0.073 | – | 0.000 | 0.018 | 0.037 | 0.110 |
| carbohydrate | 0.609 | 7.5 | 0.375 | 0.527 | 0.680 | 1.289 |
| Protein | 0.130 | 37.5 | 1.875 | 1.908 | 1.940 | 2.070 |
| Lipids | 0.066 | 5.0 | 0.250 | 0.267 | 0.283 | 0.349 |
Fig. 1Nile Red staining of the IFD in C elegans after oat feeding in the absence or presence of 2% glucose.
Fig. 2Oat feeding affected PPR, a surrogate marker of life span in C elegans.
Fig. 3Oat feeding altered gene expression of ckr-1, gcy-8, cpt-1, and cpt-2 by Q-RT-PCR in C elegans.
Fig. 4Scatter plot of PCA showing the 2 strong factors in relationship with ckr-1, cpt-1, cpt-2, gcy-8, PPR slope, and IFD.
PCA description: factor 1 and factor 2
| Relation to factors | Factor 1
| Factor 2
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPR | IFD | |||||||||||
| N2 | 11 | 24 | 99 | 98 | 100 | 100 | 94 | −90 | 1 | 15 | 2 | −6 |
| −20 | −15 | 95 | 98 | 29 | 64 | 2 | 77 | 20 | 7 | 93 | 73 | |
| −24 | 64 | 93 | 87 | 90 | 99 | 93 | −73 | 29 | 30 | 9 | 8 | |
| −17 | −34 | 98 | 78 | 96 | 98 | 95 | −89 | −3 | 52 | 24 | −7 | |