Literature DB >> 26253257

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (PNET): Staging accuracy of MDCT and its diagnostic performance for the differentiation of PNET with uncommon CT findings from pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Jung Hoon Kim1,2, Hyo Won Eun3, Young Jae Kim4, Jeong Min Lee5,6, Joon Koo Han5,6, Byung-Ihn Choi5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate staging accuracy of multidetector CT (MDCT) for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (PNET) and diagnostic performance for differentiation of PNET from pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 109 patients with surgically proven PNET (NETG1 = 66, NETG2 = 31, NEC = 12) who underwent MDCT. Two reviewers assessed stage and presence of predefined CT findings. We analysed the relationship between CT findings and tumour grade. Using PNETs with uncommon findings, we also estimated the possibility of PNET or adenocarcinoma.
RESULTS: Accuracy for T stage was 85-88% and N-metastasis was 83-89%. Common findings included well circumscribed, homogeneously enhanced, hypervascular mass, common in lower grade tumours (p < 0.05). Uncommon findings included ill-defined, heterogeneously enhanced, hypovascular mass and duct dilation, common in higher grade tumours (p < 0.05). Using 31 PNETs with uncommon findings, diagnostic performance for differentiation from adenocarcinoma was 0.760-0.806. Duct dilatation was an independent predictor for adenocarcinoma (Exp(B) = 4.569). PNETs with uncommon findings were associated with significantly worse survival versus PNET with common findings (62.7 vs. 95.7 months, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: MDCT is useful for preoperative evaluation of PNET; it not only accurately depicts the tumour stage but also prediction of tumour grade, because uncommon findings were more common in higher grade tumours. KEY POINTS: • CT accurately depicts the T stage and node metastasis of PNET. • Uncommon findings were more common in higher grade tumours. • CT information may be beneficial for optimal therapeutic planning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MDCT; Neuroendocrine tumour; Pancreas; Pancreatic cancer; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26253257     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3941-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  19 in total

1.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: radiographic calcifications correlate with grade and metastasis.

Authors:  George A Poultsides; Lyen C Huang; Yijun Chen; Brendan C Visser; Reetesh K Pai; R Brooke Jeffrey; Walter G Park; Ann M Chen; Pamela L Kunz; George A Fisher; Jeffrey A Norton
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  TNM stage and grade in predicting the prognosis of operated, non-functioning neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas--a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Franz Sellner; Sabine Thalhammer; Stefan Stättner; Josef Karner; Martin Klimpfinger
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Detection of pancreatic tumors, image quality, and radiation dose during the pancreatic parenchymal phase: effect of a low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current CT technique--preliminary results.

Authors:  Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson; Huiman Barnhart; Sebastian T Schindera; Lisa M Ho; Tracy A Jaffe; Terry T Yoshizumi; Richard Youngblood; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas at dynamic enhanced CT: comparison between grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma and grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumour.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Hyoung Jung Kim; Kyung Won Kim; Jae Ho Byun; Ki Byung Song; Ji Hoon Kim; Seung-Mo Hong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Pancreatic endocrine tumors: tumor blood flow assessed with perfusion CT reflects angiogenesis and correlates with prognostic factors.

Authors:  Gaspard d'Assignies; Anne Couvelard; Stéphane Bahrami; Marie-Pierre Vullierme; Pascal Hammel; Olivia Hentic; Alain Sauvanet; Pierre Bedossa; Philippe Ruszniewski; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Abdominal MDCT: protocols and contrast considerations.

Authors:  Renate M Hammerstingl; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Clinical outcome and long-term survival in 118 consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas.

Authors:  L Fischer; J Kleeff; I Esposito; U Hinz; A Zimmermann; H Friess; M W Büchler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 8.  Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas.

Authors:  Florian Ehehalt; Hans D Saeger; C Max Schmidt; Robert Grützmann
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2009-05-01

9.  TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system.

Authors:  G Rindi; G Klöppel; H Alhman; M Caplin; A Couvelard; W W de Herder; B Erikssson; A Falchetti; M Falconi; P Komminoth; M Körner; J M Lopes; A-M McNicol; O Nilsson; A Perren; A Scarpa; J-Y Scoazec; B Wiedenmann
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Differential Diagnosis of Focal Non-Cystic Pancreatic Lesions With and Without Proximal Dilation of Pancreatic Duct Noted on CT Scan.

Authors:  Pavan Tummala Md; Savitha Rao Md; Banke Agarwal Md
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.488

View more
  21 in total

1.  Serotonin immunoreactive pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm associated with main pancreatic duct dilation: a recognizable entity with excellent long-term outcome.

Authors:  Marco Dioguardi Burgio; Jérome Cros; Nicola Panvini; Thomas Depoilly; Anne Couvelard; Philippe Ruszniewski; Louis de Mestier; Olivia Hentic; Alain Sauvanet; Safi Dokmak; Alex Faccinetto; Maxime Ronot; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Contrast-enhanced MDCT in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: correlation with histological findings and diagnostic performance in differentiation between tumour grades.

Authors:  E Belousova; G Karmazanovsky; A Kriger; D Kalinin; L Mannelli; A Glotov; N Karelskaya; O Paklina; A Kaldarov
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour from intrapancreatic accessory spleen.

Authors:  Ankur Pandey; Pallavi Pandey; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Farnaz Najmi Varzaneh; Pegah Khoshpouri; Nannan Shao; Manijeh Zargham Pour; Daniel Fadaei Fouladi; Ralph H Hruban; Anne Marie O'Broin-Lennon; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Lymph Node Metastases of Resected Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Masayuki Tanaka; Max Heckler; André L Mihaljevic; Pascal Probst; Ulla Klaiber; Ulrike Heger; Simon Schimmack; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances, current status, and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 6.  Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 7.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a 2022 update for radiologists.

Authors:  Samuel J Galgano; Ajaykumar C Morani; Dheeraj R Gopireddy; Kedar Sharbidre; David D B Bates; Ajit H Goenka; Hina Arif-Tiwari; Malak Itani; Amir Iravani; Sanaz Javadi; Silvana Faria; Chandana Lall; Emily Bergsland; Sadhna Verma; Isaac R Francis; Daniel M Halperin; Deyali Chatterjee; Priya Bhosale; Motoyo Yano
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-03-04

8.  Outcome and CT differentiation of gallbladder neuroendocrine tumours from adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Tae-Hyung Kim; Se Hyung Kim; Kyoung Boon Lee; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Radiographic characteristics of neuroendocrine liver metastases do not predict clinical outcomes following liver resection.

Authors:  Emily A Armstrong; Eliza W Beal; Manisha Shah; Bhavana Konda; Sherif Abdel-Misih; Aslam Ejaz; Mary E Dillhoff; Timothy M Pawlik; Jordan M Cloyd
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.293

10.  Utility of CT in differentiating liver metastases of well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms from poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Yong Cui; Xiaoting Li; Shunyu Gao; Zhongwu Li; Yanling Li; Ming Lu; Yingshi Sun
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.