Literature DB >> 29134352

Accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour from intrapancreatic accessory spleen.

Ankur Pandey1, Pallavi Pandey1, Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh1, Farnaz Najmi Varzaneh1, Pegah Khoshpouri1, Nannan Shao1, Manijeh Zargham Pour1, Daniel Fadaei Fouladi1, Ralph H Hruban2, Anne Marie O'Broin-Lennon3, Ihab R Kamel4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of absolute apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and normalised ADC (lesion-to-spleen ADC ratio) in differentiating pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (NET) from intrapancreatic accessory spleen (IPAS).
METHODS: Study included 62 patients with the diagnosis of pancreatic NET (n=51) or IPAS (n=11). Two independent reviewers measured ADC on all lesions and spleen. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to differentiate NET from IPAS was performed and compared for absolute and normalised ADC. Inter-reader reliability for the two methods was assessed.
RESULTS: Pancreatic NET had significantly higher absolute ADC (1.431x10-3 vs 0.967x10-3 mm2/s; P<0.0001) and normalised ADC (1.59 vs 1.09; P<0.0001) compared to IPAS. An ADC value of ≥1.206x10-3 mm2/s was 70.6% sensitive and 90.9% specific for the diagnosis of NET vs. IPAS. Lesion to spleen ADC ratio of ≥1.25 was 80.4% sensitive, and 81.8% specific while ratio of ≥1.29 was 74.5% sensitive and 100% specific in the differentiation. The area under the curve (AUCs) for two methods were similar (88.2% vs. 88.8%; P=0.899). Both methods demonstrated excellent inter-reader reliability with ICCs for absolute ADC and ADC ratio being 0.957 and 0.927, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Both absolute and normalised ADC allow clinically relevant differentiation of pancreatic NET and IPAS. KEY POINTS: • Imaging overlaps between IPASs and pancreatic-NETs lead to unnecessary procedures including pancreatectomy. • Uniquely low ADC of spleen allows differentiating IPASs from pancreatic NETs. • Both absolute-ADC and normalised-ADC (lesion-to-spleen ADC-ratio) demonstrate high accuracy in differentiating IPASs from NETs. • Both methods demonstrate excellent inter-reader reliability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion MRI; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Neuroendocrine Tumours; Pancreas; Spleen

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29134352     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5122-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  35 in total

1.  Intrapancreatic splenunculus.

Authors:  Goswin Y Meyer-Rochow; Andrew J Gifford; Jaswinder S Samra; Mark S Sywak
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Short- and midterm reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements at 3.0-T diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen.

Authors:  Adam C Braithwaite; Brian M Dale; Daniel T Boll; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Apparent diffusion coefficient reproducibility of the pancreas measured at different MR scanners using diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Ye; Jia-Yin Gao; Zheng-Han Yang; Yuan Liu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Intrapancreatic accessory spleen diagnosed by technetium-99m heat-damaged red blood cell SPECT.

Authors:  T Ota; M Tei; A Yoshioka; M Mizuno; S Watanabe; M Seki; H Nakata; I Yamamoto; R Morita
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Differentiation of an intrapancreatic accessory spleen from a small (<3-cm) solid pancreatic tumor: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Kyung Mi Jang; Seong Hyun Kim; Soon Jin Lee; Min Jung Park; Mi Hee Lee; Dongil Choi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (PNET): Staging accuracy of MDCT and its diagnostic performance for the differentiation of PNET with uncommon CT findings from pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jung Hoon Kim; Hyo Won Eun; Young Jae Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung-Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Gadolinium- and superparamagnetic-iron-oxide-enhanced MR findings of intrapancreatic accessory spleen in five patients.

Authors:  Vasco Herédia; Ersan Altun; Fatmir Bilaj; Miguel Ramalho; Brian W Hyslop; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of pancreas tumours.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kartalis; Terri L Lindholm; Peter Aspelin; Johan Permert; Nils Albiin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Multi-centre reproducibility of diffusion MRI parameters for clinical sequences in the brain.

Authors:  Matthew Grech-Sollars; Patrick W Hales; Keiko Miyazaki; Felix Raschke; Daniel Rodriguez; Martin Wilson; Simrandip K Gill; Tina Banks; Dawn E Saunders; Jonathan D Clayden; Matt N Gwilliam; Thomas R Barrick; Paul S Morgan; Nigel P Davies; James Rossiter; Dorothee P Auer; Richard Grundy; Martin O Leach; Franklyn A Howe; Andrew C Peet; Chris A Clark
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Apparent diffusion coefficient normalization of normal liver: Will it improve the reproducibility of diffusion-weighted imaging at different MR scanners as a new biomarker?

Authors:  Jie Zhu; Jie Zhang; Jia-Yin Gao; Jin-Ning Li; Da-Wei Yang; Min Chen; Cheng Zhou; Zheng-Han Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  5 in total

1.  Added value of apparent diffusion coefficient in distinguishing between serous and mucin-producing pancreatic cystic neoplasms.

Authors:  Pallavi Pandey; Ankur Pandey; Nannan Shao; Farnaz Najmi Varzaneh; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Manijeh Zharghampour; Pegah Khoshpouri; Daniel Fouladi; John Eng; Anne Marie O'Broin-Lennon; Marcia Canto; Ralph H Hruban; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Accuracy of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  LuShun Zhang; LongLin Yin; MeiLin Zhu; ChuanDe Zhang; JingXin Yan; Ju Sun; XinYi Zhao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Quantitative diffusion MRI of the abdomen and pelvis.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Yuxin Zhang; Ali Pirasteh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 4.  MR Imaging of the Perihepatic Space.

Authors:  Angèle Bonnin; Carole Durot; Manel Djelouah; Anthony Dohan; Lionel Arrivé; Pascal Rousset; Christine Hoeffel
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 5.  Inflammatory and tumor-like lesions of the pancreas.

Authors:  Claudio Luchini; Matteo Fassan; Claudio Doglioni; Paola Capelli; Giuseppe Ingravallo; Giuseppina Renzulli; Sara Pecori; Gaetano Paolino; Ada M Florena; Aldo Scarpa; Giuseppe Zamboni
Journal:  Pathologica       Date:  2020-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.