Literature DB >> 26250144

Surgeon perspectives on the use and effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in the treatment of rectal cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Sami A Chadi1, Marianna Berho, Steven D Wexner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite screening initiatives, rectal cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies diagnosed in patients worldwide with a high mortality. The introduction of neoadjuvant therapy has resulted in a paradigm shift in the treatment and outcomes of rectal cancer. Surgeons play an intricate role in the pre-operative, operative, and post-operative management of these patients.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this comprehensive literature review was to summarize the evolution of the use chemotherapy and radiation and the process of differentiation into specific neoadjuvant chemoradiation protocols in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. This will provide a concise summary for practicing surgeons of the current evidence for neoadjuvant chemoradiation as well as the various implications of therapy on operative outcomes.
CONCLUSION: The initial benefit of adjuvant therapy in the treatment of rectal cancer patients became evident with prospective studies demonstrating improvements in various oncologic survival outcomes. Due to the improved compliance and reduced toxicity, as well as the potential for tumor down-staging and sphincter preservation, neoadjuvant approaches became the preferred method of administering chemotherapy and radiation. Furthermore, a subgroup of patients has been shown to present with complete clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy. This has resulted in the development of the non-operative "watch and wait" approach, which has initiated discussions on changing the interval from the completion of neoadjuvant therapy to surgical resection. The continued development of the multidisciplinary approach will only further improve our ability to provide patients with the best possible oncologic outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26250144     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-015-1328-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  96 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of postoperative radiotherapy and short-term time-scheduled 5-fluorouracil against surgery alone in the treatment of Dukes B and C rectal cancer. Norwegian Adjuvant Rectal Cancer Project Group.

Authors:  K M Tveit; I Guldvog; S Hagen; E Trondsen; T Harbitz; K Nygaard; J B Nilsen; E Wist; E Hannisdal
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a case-control study.

Authors:  P Jestin; L Påhlman; U Gunnarsson
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer.

Authors:  B Cedermark; M Dahlberg; B Glimelius; L Påhlman; L E Rutqvist; N Wilking
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and conservative treatment in rectal cancer. Findings from the ACCORD 12/PRODIGE 2 randomized trial.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Gérard; Emmanuel Chamorey; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Karène Benezery; Guy de Laroche; Marc-André Mahé; Valérie Boige; Béata Juzyna
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for distal rectal cancer: characterization of clinical and endoscopic findings for standardization.

Authors:  Angelita Habr-Gama; Rodrigo O Perez; Gregory Wynn; John Marks; Hermann Kessler; Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years.

Authors:  Rolf Sauer; Torsten Liersch; Susanne Merkel; Rainer Fietkau; Werner Hohenberger; Clemens Hess; Heinz Becker; Hans-Rudolf Raab; Marie-Therese Villanueva; Helmut Witzigmann; Christian Wittekind; Tim Beissbarth; Claus Rödel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Final results of a randomized trial on the treatment of rectal cancer with preoperative radiotherapy alone or in combination with 5-fluorouracil, followed by radical surgery. Trial of the European Organization on Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group.

Authors:  S Boulis-Wassif; A Gerard; J Loygue; D Camelot; M Buyse; N Duez
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  The role of diffusion-weighted MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the prediction of pathologic complete response after radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ines Joye; Christophe M Deroose; Vincent Vandecaveye; Karin Haustermans
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03.

Authors:  Mark S Roh; Linda H Colangelo; Michael J O'Connell; Greg Yothers; Melvin Deutsch; Carmen J Allegra; Morton S Kahlenberg; Luis Baez-Diaz; Carol S Ursiny; Nicholas J Petrelli; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Preoperative chemoradiation versus radiation alone for stage II and III resectable rectal cancer.

Authors:  Laura De Caluwé; Yves Van Nieuwenhove; Wim P Ceelen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Wait-and-see treatment strategies for rectal cancer patients with clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Li; Lunjin Li; Lin Yang; Jiatian Yuan; Bo Lv; Yanan Yao; Shasha Xing
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.