Literature DB >> 23450565

Preoperative chemoradiation versus radiation alone for stage II and III resectable rectal cancer.

Laura De Caluwé1, Yves Van Nieuwenhove, Wim P Ceelen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) decreases local recurrence rate and improves survival in stage II and III rectal cancer patients. The combination of chemotherapy with RT has a sound radiobiological rationale, and phase II trials of combined chemoradiation (CRT) have shown promising activity in rectal cancer.
OBJECTIVES: To compare preoperative RT with preoperative CRT in patients with resectable stage II and III rectal cancer. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Embase.com, and Pubmed from 1975 until June 2012. A manual search was performed of Ann Surg, Arch Surg, Cancer, J Clin Oncol, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys and the proceedings of ASTRO, ECCO and ASCO from 1990 until June 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: Relevant studies randomized resectable stage II or III rectal cancer patients to at least one arm of preoperative RT alone or at least one arm of preoperative CRT. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Primary outcome parameters included overall survival (OS) at 5 years and local recurrence (LR) rate at 5 years. Secondary outcome parameters included disease free survival (DFS) at 5 years, metastasis rate, pathological complete response rate, clinical response rate, sphincter preservation rate, acute toxicity, postoperative mortality and morbidity, and anastomotic leak rate. Outcome parameters were summarized using the Odds Ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) using the fixed effects model. MAIN
RESULTS: Five trials were identified and included in the meta-analysis. From one of the included trials only preliminary data are reported. The addition of chemotherapy to preoperative RT significantly increased grade III and IV acute toxicity (OR 1.68-10, P = 0.002) and marginally affected postoperative overall morbidity (OR 0.67-1.00, P = 0.05) while no differences were observed in postoperative mortality or anastomotic leak rate. Compared to preoperative RT alone, preoperative CRT significantly increased the rate of complete pathological response (OR 2.12-5.84, P < 0.00001) although this did not translate into a higher sphincter preservation rate (OR 0.92-1.30, P = 0.32). The incidence of local recurrence at five years was significantly lower in the CRT group compared to RT alone (OR 0.39-0.72, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed in DFS (OR 0.92-1.34, P = 0.27) or OS (OR 0.79-1.14, P = 0.58) at five years. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to preoperative RT alone, preoperative CRT enhances pathological response and improves local control in resectable stage II and III rectal cancer, but does not benefit disease free or overall survival. The effects of preoperative CRT on functional outcome and quality of life are incompletely understood and should be addressed in future trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23450565     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006041.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  63 in total

1.  A prospective phase II study of magnetic resonance imaging guided hematopoietical bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Wang Jianyang; Tian Yuan; Tang Yuan; Wang Xin; Li Ning; Ren Hua; Fang Hui; Feng Yanru; Wang Shulian; Song Yongwen; Liu Yueping; Wang Weihu; Li Yexiong; Jin Jing
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Worse Outcomes for Head and Neck Rhabdomyosarcoma Secondary to Reduced-Dose Cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Dana L Casey; Leonard H Wexler; Suzanne L Wolden
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Non-operative management of rectal cancer: understanding tumor biology.

Authors:  Iris H Wei; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant treatment and surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Andrea Coinu; Veronica Lonati; Sandro Barni
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Rectal Cancer in 2018: A Primer for the Gastroenterologist.

Authors:  Benjamin A Goldenberg; Emma B Holliday; Ramzi M Helewa; Harminder Singh
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Diagnostic value of preoperative CT scan to stratify colon cancer for neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Armin Wiegering; Meik Kunz; Mohamed Hussein; Ingo Klein; Verena Wiegering; Friedrich Wilhelm Uthe; Ulrich A Dietz; Christian Jurowich; Thorsten Bley; Thomas Dandekar; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Christian Ritter
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Monica Millan; Sandra Merino; Aleidis Caro; Francesc Feliu; Jordi Escuder; Tani Francesch
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-10-15

Review 8.  Radiotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: Current Standards and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Matthias F Häfner; Jürgen Debus
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-06-16

Review 9.  Clinical utility of pretreatment prediction of chemoradiotherapy response in rectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Byong Chul Yoo; Seung-Gu Yeo
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 10.  Surgeon perspectives on the use and effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in the treatment of rectal cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Marianna Berho; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.