| Literature DB >> 26248006 |
Pedro Almeida1, Raquel Barbosa1, Polona Zalar2, Yumi Imanishi3, Kiminori Shimizu4, Benedetta Turchetti5, Jean-Luc Legras6, Marta Serra1, Sylvie Dequin6, Arnaud Couloux7, Julie Guy7, Douda Bensasson8, Paula Gonçalves1, José Paulo Sampaio1.
Abstract
The domestication of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is thought to be contemporary with the development and expansion of viticulture along the Mediterranean basin. Until now, the unavailability of wild lineages prevented the identification of the closest wild relatives of wine yeasts. Here, we enlarge the collection of natural lineages and employ whole-genome data of oak-associated wild isolates to study a balanced number of anthropic and natural S. cerevisiae strains. We identified industrial variants and new geographically delimited populations, including a novel Mediterranean oak population. This population is the closest relative of the wine lineage as shown by a weak population structure and further supported by genomewide population analyses. A coalescent model considering partial isolation with asymmetrical migration, mostly from the wild group into the Wine group, and population growth, was found to be best supported by the data. Importantly, divergence time estimates between the two populations agree with historical evidence for winemaking. We show that three horizontally transmitted regions, previously described to contain genes relevant to wine fermentation, are present in the Wine group but not in the Mediterranean oak group. This represents a major discontinuity between the two populations and is likely to denote a domestication fingerprint in wine yeasts. Taken together, these results indicate that Mediterranean oaks harbour the wild genetic stock of domesticated wine yeasts.Entities:
Keywords: comparative genomics; domestication fingerprints; microbe domestication; microbe population genomics; yeast molecular ecology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26248006 DOI: 10.1111/mec.13341
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Ecol ISSN: 0962-1083 Impact factor: 6.185