Literature DB >> 27020745

Independent Origins of Yeast Associated with Coffee and Cacao Fermentation.

Catherine L Ludlow1, Gareth A Cromie1, Cecilia Garmendia-Torres2, Amy Sirr1, Michelle Hays3, Colburn Field4, Eric W Jeffery1, Justin C Fay5, Aimée M Dudley6.   

Abstract

Modern transportation networks have facilitated the migration and mingling of previously isolated populations of plants, animals, and insects. Human activities can also influence the global distribution of microorganisms. The best-understood example is yeasts associated with winemaking. Humans began making wine in the Middle East over 9,000 years ago [1, 2]. Selecting favorable fermentation products created specialized strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae [3, 4] that were transported along with grapevines. Today, S. cerevisiae strains residing in vineyards around the world are genetically similar, and their population structure suggests a common origin that followed the path of human migration [3-7]. Like wine, coffee and cacao depend on microbial fermentation [8, 9] and have been globally dispersed by humans. Theobroma cacao originated in the Amazon and Orinoco basins of Colombia and Venezuela [10], was cultivated in Central America by Mesoamerican peoples, and was introduced to Europeans by Hernán Cortés in 1530 [11]. Coffea, native to Ethiopia, was disseminated by Arab traders throughout the Middle East and North Africa in the 6(th) century and was introduced to European consumers in the 17(th) century [12]. Here, we tested whether the yeasts associated with coffee and cacao are genetically similar, crop-specific populations or genetically diverse, geography-specific populations. Our results uncovered populations that, while defined by niche and geography, also bear signatures of admixture between major populations in events independent of the transport of the plants. Thus, human-associated fermentation and migration may have affected the distribution of yeast involved in the production of coffee and chocolate.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27020745      PMCID: PMC4821677          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  28 in total

1.  Species diversity, community dynamics, and metabolite kinetics of the microbiota associated with traditional ecuadorian spontaneous cocoa bean fermentations.

Authors:  Zoi Papalexandratou; Gwen Falony; Edwina Romanens; Juan Carlos Jimenez; Freddy Amores; Heide-Marie Daniel; Luc De Vuyst
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Microbial diversity during maturation and natural processing of coffee cherries of Coffea arabica in Brazil.

Authors:  C F Silv; R F Schwan; E S Sousa Dias; A E Wheals
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2000-09-25       Impact factor: 5.277

3.  Evidence for S. cerevisiae fermentation in ancient wine.

Authors:  Duccio Cavalieri; Patrick E McGovern; Daniel L Hartl; Robert Mortimer; Mario Polsinelli
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity.

Authors:  Qi-Ming Wang; Wan-Qiu Liu; Gianni Liti; Shi-An Wang; Feng-Yan Bai
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 5.  The microbiology of cocoa fermentation and its role in chocolate quality.

Authors:  Rosane F Schwan; Alan E Wheals
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.176

6.  Microbial biogeography of wine grapes is conditioned by cultivar, vintage, and climate.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bokulich; John H Thorngate; Paul M Richardson; David A Mills
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Divergence in wine characteristics produced by wild and domesticated strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Katie E Hyma; Sofie M Saerens; Kevin J Verstrepen; Justin C Fay
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Regional microbial signatures positively correlate with differential wine phenotypes: evidence for a microbial aspect to terroir.

Authors:  Sarah Knight; Steffen Klaere; Bruno Fedrizzi; Matthew R Goddard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Genomic sequence diversity and population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae assessed by RAD-seq.

Authors:  Gareth A Cromie; Katie E Hyma; Catherine L Ludlow; Cecilia Garmendia-Torres; Teresa L Gilbert; Patrick May; Angela A Huang; Aimée M Dudley; Justin C Fay
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers.

Authors:  Nathan A Baird; Paul D Etter; Tressa S Atwood; Mark C Currey; Anthony L Shiver; Zachary A Lewis; Eric U Selker; William A Cresko; Eric A Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary biology through the lens of budding yeast comparative genomics.

Authors:  Souhir Marsit; Jean-Baptiste Leducq; Éléonore Durand; Axelle Marchant; Marie Filteau; Christian R Landry
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Not just browsing: an animal that grazes phyllosphere microbes facilitates community heterogeneity.

Authors:  Richard O'Rorke; Leah Tooman; Kapono Gaughen; Brenden S Holland; Anthony S Amend
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 3.  Genome Diversity and Evolution in the Budding Yeasts (Saccharomycotina).

Authors:  Bernard A Dujon; Edward J Louis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A method for quantifying sporulation efficiency and isolating meiotic progeny in non-GMO strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Amy Sirr; Martin S Timour; Gareth A Cromie; Michelle Tang; Aimée M Dudley
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Domestication reprogrammed the budding yeast life cycle.

Authors:  Matteo De Chiara; Benjamin P Barré; Karl Persson; Agurtzane Irizar; Chiara Vischioni; Sakshi Khaiwal; Simon Stenberg; Onyetugo Chioma Amadi; Gašper Žun; Katja Doberšek; Cristian Taccioli; Joseph Schacherer; Uroš Petrovič; Jonas Warringer; Gianni Liti
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 19.100

6.  European derived Saccharomyces cerevisiae colonisation of New Zealand vineyards aided by humans.

Authors:  Velimir Gayevskiy; Soon Lee; Matthew R Goddard
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Habitat Predicts Levels of Genetic Admixture in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Viranga Tilakaratna; Douda Bensasson
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Natural Variation in SER1 and ENA6 Underlie Condition-Specific Growth Defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Amy Sirr; Adrian C Scott; Gareth A Cromie; Catherine L Ludlow; Vida Ahyong; Trey S Morgan; Teresa Gilbert; Aimée M Dudley
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 9.  Industrial Relevance of Chromosomal Copy Number Variation in Saccharomyces Yeasts.

Authors:  Arthur R Gorter de Vries; Jack T Pronk; Jean-Marc G Daran
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  The origin and adaptive evolution of domesticated populations of yeast from Far East Asia.

Authors:  Shou-Fu Duan; Pei-Jie Han; Qi-Ming Wang; Wan-Qiu Liu; Jun-Yan Shi; Kuan Li; Xiao-Ling Zhang; Feng-Yan Bai
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.