Amina Merchant1, Simon Hendel2, Ross Shockley3, Joseph Schlesinger4, Hilary Vansell4, Kelly McQueen5. 1. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 21st Ave, 404 MAB, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA. amina.i.merchant@vanderbilt.edu. 2. Center for International Health, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. 3. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Ave, 7209 Medical Center East-South Tower, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA. 4. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA. 5. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1301 Medical Center Drive, #4648 TVC, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Since 2007, observations reveal that low- and middle-income countries (LICs and LMICs) experience similar surgical access and safety issues, though the etiology of these challenges varies by country. The collective voice of surveys completed to date has pushed the agenda for the inclusion of safe surgery and anesthesia within global health discussions. Comparison of four countries across the world shows similar basic progress as well as ongoing surgical and anesthesia needs in resource-challenged countries. By studying these common needs, a comprehensive plan to provide infrastructure and personnel support can work in multiple austere settings. METHODS: A standardized survey tool published, designed, and developed initially by the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative and modified at Vanderbilt University was completed in Guatemala, Guyana, Laos, and Mozambique. The survey assessed eight key areas of essential surgical care: access to and availability of surgical services, access to human resources, essential infrastructure (including access to water, electricity, sanitation, blood products, and essential medicines including supplemental oxygen), surgical outcomes, operating room information and procedures, equipment, International Organization, and Non-Government Organization provision of surgical care. These results were compared and contrasted to evaluate resource challenges and assets in each country. RESULTS: A total of 49 hospitals were surveyed in this comparison cohort. The results reveal common needs for emergency and essential surgery in each country, but some differences in human and capital resources exist. While minimal resources exist, all surgical sites provided running water, electricity, and oxygen-assets not seen in previous surveys as recent as 2011. CONCLUSION: The most basic needs to provide essential surgery are now present in LICs and LMICs. Many more resources are needed to ensure access to safe surgery and anesthesia. The next steps to provide essential surgery must include common solutions for access to surgery and anesthesia, and an evaluation of patient safety in these endeavors through the perioperative mortality rate.
INTRODUCTION: Since 2007, observations reveal that low- and middle-income countries (LICs and LMICs) experience similar surgical access and safety issues, though the etiology of these challenges varies by country. The collective voice of surveys completed to date has pushed the agenda for the inclusion of safe surgery and anesthesia within global health discussions. Comparison of four countries across the world shows similar basic progress as well as ongoing surgical and anesthesia needs in resource-challenged countries. By studying these common needs, a comprehensive plan to provide infrastructure and personnel support can work in multiple austere settings. METHODS: A standardized survey tool published, designed, and developed initially by the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative and modified at Vanderbilt University was completed in Guatemala, Guyana, Laos, and Mozambique. The survey assessed eight key areas of essential surgical care: access to and availability of surgical services, access to human resources, essential infrastructure (including access to water, electricity, sanitation, blood products, and essential medicines including supplemental oxygen), surgical outcomes, operating room information and procedures, equipment, International Organization, and Non-Government Organization provision of surgical care. These results were compared and contrasted to evaluate resource challenges and assets in each country. RESULTS: A total of 49 hospitals were surveyed in this comparison cohort. The results reveal common needs for emergency and essential surgery in each country, but some differences in human and capital resources exist. While minimal resources exist, all surgical sites provided running water, electricity, and oxygen-assets not seen in previous surveys as recent as 2011. CONCLUSION: The most basic needs to provide essential surgery are now present in LICs and LMICs. Many more resources are needed to ensure access to safe surgery and anesthesia. The next steps to provide essential surgery must include common solutions for access to surgery and anesthesia, and an evaluation of patient safety in these endeavors through the perioperative mortality rate.
Authors: Luke M Funk; Thomas G Weiser; William R Berry; Stuart R Lipsitz; Alan F Merry; Angela C Enright; Iain H Wilson; Gerald Dziekan; Atul A Gawande Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-07-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Thomas G Weiser; Scott E Regenbogen; Katherine D Thompson; Alex B Haynes; Stuart R Lipsitz; William R Berry; Atul A Gawande Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-06-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christopher J L Murray; Majid Ezzati; Abraham D Flaxman; Stephen Lim; Rafael Lozano; Catherine Michaud; Mohsen Naghavi; Joshua A Salomon; Kenji Shibuya; Theo Vos; Alan D Lopez Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-12-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Hideki Higashi; Jan J Barendregt; Nicholas J Kassebaum; Thomas G Weiser; Stephen W Bickler; Theo Vos Journal: World J Surg Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Lisa M Knowlton; Paulin Banguti; Smita Chackungal; Traychit Chanthasiri; Tiffany E Chao; Bernice Dahn; Milliard Derbew; Debashish Dhar; Micaela M Esquivel; Faye Evans; Simon Hendel; Drake G LeBrun; Michelle Notrica; Iracema Saavedra-Pozo; Ross Shockley; Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz; Boualy Vannavong; Kelly A McQueen; David A Spain; Thomas G Weiser Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Melissa G Potisek; David M Hatch; Evans Atito-Narh; Jerry Agudogo; Adeyemi J Olufolabi; Michael Rieker; Holly A Muir; Medge D Owen Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2017-04-13
Authors: Janet Martin; Goa Tau; Meena Nathan Cherian; Jennifer Vergel de Dios; David Mills; Jane Fitzpatrick; William Adu-Krow; Davy Cheng Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Henry E Rice; Randall Lou-Meda; Anthony T Saxton; Bria E Johnston; Carla C Ramirez; Sindy Mendez; Eli N Rice; Bernardo Aidar; Brad Taicher; Joy Noel Baumgartner; Judy Milne; Allan S Frankel; J Bryan Sexton Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2018-03-09