Alain Chichom-Mefire1,2, Victor Mbome Njie3,4, Vincent Verla3, Julius Atashili3. 1. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon. chichomefire@gmail.com. 2. Department of Surgery and Obstetrics/Gynaecology, Regional Hospital Limbe, Limbe, Cameroon. chichomefire@gmail.com. 3. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon. 4. Regional Delegation of Public Health, Buea, Cameroon.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgery-related conditions account for the majority of admissions in primary referral hospitals in Sub-Saharan Africa. The role of surgery in the reduction of global disease burden is well recognized, but there is a great qualitative and quantitative disparity in the delivery of surgical and anaesthetic services between countries. This study aims at estimating the nature and volume of surgery delivered in an entire administrative division of Cameroon. METHODS: In this retrospective survey conducted during the year 2013, we used a standard tool to analyse the infrastructure and human resources involved in the delivery of surgical and anaesthetic services in the Fako division in the south-west region of Cameroon. We also estimated the nature and volume of surgical services as a rate per catchment population. RESULTS: Public, private and mission hospital contributed equally to the delivery of surgical services in the Fako. For every 100,000 people, there were <5 operative rooms. A total of 2460 surgical interventions were performed by 2.2 surgeons, 1.1 gynaecologists and 0.3 anaesthetists. These surgical interventions consisted mostly of minor and emergency procedures. Neurosurgery, paediatric, thoracic and endocrine surgery were almost non-existent. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of surgery delivered in the Fako is far below the minimum rates required to meet up with the most basic requirements of the populations. It is likely that most of these surgical needs are left unattended. A community-based assessment of unmet surgical needs is necessary to accurately estimate the magnitude of the problem and guide surgical capacity improvements.
BACKGROUND: Surgery-related conditions account for the majority of admissions in primary referral hospitals in Sub-Saharan Africa. The role of surgery in the reduction of global disease burden is well recognized, but there is a great qualitative and quantitative disparity in the delivery of surgical and anaesthetic services between countries. This study aims at estimating the nature and volume of surgery delivered in an entire administrative division of Cameroon. METHODS: In this retrospective survey conducted during the year 2013, we used a standard tool to analyse the infrastructure and human resources involved in the delivery of surgical and anaesthetic services in the Fako division in the south-west region of Cameroon. We also estimated the nature and volume of surgical services as a rate per catchment population. RESULTS: Public, private and mission hospital contributed equally to the delivery of surgical services in the Fako. For every 100,000 people, there were <5 operative rooms. A total of 2460 surgical interventions were performed by 2.2 surgeons, 1.1 gynaecologists and 0.3 anaesthetists. These surgical interventions consisted mostly of minor and emergency procedures. Neurosurgery, paediatric, thoracic and endocrine surgery were almost non-existent. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of surgery delivered in the Fako is far below the minimum rates required to meet up with the most basic requirements of the populations. It is likely that most of these surgical needs are left unattended. A community-based assessment of unmet surgical needs is necessary to accurately estimate the magnitude of the problem and guide surgical capacity improvements.
Authors: Caris E Grimes; Rebekah S L Law; Eric S Borgstein; Nyeno C Mkandawire; Christopher B D Lavy Journal: World J Surg Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Abraham Markin; Roxana Barbero; Jeffrey J Leow; Reinou S Groen; Evan J Skow; Keith N Apelgren; Adam L Kushner; Benedict C Nwomeh Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Shailvi Gupta; Anju Ranjit; Ritesh Shrestha; Evan G Wong; William C Robinson; Sunil Shrestha; Benedict C Nwomeh; Reinou S Groen; Adam L Kushner Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: John Rose; Thomas G Weiser; Phil Hider; Leona Wilson; Russell L Gruen; Stephen W Bickler Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Moses Galukande; Johan von Schreeb; Andreas Wladis; Naboth Mbembati; Helder de Miranda; Margaret E Kruk; Sam Luboga; Alphonsus Matovu; Colin McCord; S Khady Ndao-Brumblay; Doruk Ozgediz; Peter C Rockers; Ana Romàn Quiñones; Fernando Vaz; Haile T Debas; Sarah B Macfarlane Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Barclay T Stewart; Adam Gyedu; Francis Abantanga; Abdul Rashid Abdulai; Godfred Boakye; Adam Kushner Journal: World J Surg Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Amina Merchant; Simon Hendel; Ross Shockley; Joseph Schlesinger; Hilary Vansell; Kelly McQueen Journal: World J Surg Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Katherine Albutt; Gustaf Drevin; Rachel R Yorlets; Emma Svensson; Didacus B Namanya; Mark G Shrime; Peter Kayima Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-10-24 Impact factor: 3.240