BACKGROUND: Statins have been shown to be beneficial in primary and secondary prevention settings; however, their role in the elderly remains a clinical conundrum, given that age-related factors could alter the risk-benefit ratio of statin treatment. This study aimed to critically evaluate the efficacy and safety of statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the elderly. METHODS: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials comparing any statins with placebo or usual care for primary prevention of CVD in subjects aged ≥65 years. Relative risks (RRs) using a random effects model were calculated and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of findings. RESULTS: Eight studies (n = 25,952) were included in the meta-analysis. Statins significantly reduced the risks of composite major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.92), nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI] (0.75, 0.59-0.94) and total MI (0.74, 0.61-0.90). Treatment effects of statins were statistically insignificant in fatal MI (0.43, 0.09-2.01), stroke (fatal: 0.76, 0.24-2.45; nonfatal: 0.76, 0.53-1.11; total: 0.85, 0.68-1.06) and all-cause mortality (0.96, 0.88-1.04). Significant differences were not observed in myalgia (0.88, 0.69-1.13), elevation of hepatic transaminases (0.98, 0.71-1.34), new-onset diabetes (1.07, 0.77-1.48), serious adverse events (1.00, 0.97-1.04) and discontinuation due to adverse events (1.10, 0.85-1.42). The occurrence of myopathy, rhabdomyolysis and cognitive impairment was largely unreported in the included trials. CONCLUSIONS: From a risk-benefit perspective, there is a role of statins for the primary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events in elderly patients. Further studies are needed to ascertain the benefits of statins on fatal MI, stroke and all-cause mortality.
BACKGROUND: Statins have been shown to be beneficial in primary and secondary prevention settings; however, their role in the elderly remains a clinical conundrum, given that age-related factors could alter the risk-benefit ratio of statin treatment. This study aimed to critically evaluate the efficacy and safety of statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the elderly. METHODS: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials comparing any statins with placebo or usual care for primary prevention of CVD in subjects aged ≥65 years. Relative risks (RRs) using a random effects model were calculated and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of findings. RESULTS: Eight studies (n = 25,952) were included in the meta-analysis. Statins significantly reduced the risks of composite major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.92), nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI] (0.75, 0.59-0.94) and total MI (0.74, 0.61-0.90). Treatment effects of statins were statistically insignificant in fatal MI (0.43, 0.09-2.01), stroke (fatal: 0.76, 0.24-2.45; nonfatal: 0.76, 0.53-1.11; total: 0.85, 0.68-1.06) and all-cause mortality (0.96, 0.88-1.04). Significant differences were not observed in myalgia (0.88, 0.69-1.13), elevation of hepatic transaminases (0.98, 0.71-1.34), new-onset diabetes (1.07, 0.77-1.48), serious adverse events (1.00, 0.97-1.04) and discontinuation due to adverse events (1.10, 0.85-1.42). The occurrence of myopathy, rhabdomyolysis and cognitive impairment was largely unreported in the included trials. CONCLUSIONS: From a risk-benefit perspective, there is a role of statins for the primary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events in elderly patients. Further studies are needed to ascertain the benefits of statins on fatal MI, stroke and all-cause mortality.
Authors: Michael D Miedema; Faye L Lopez; Michael J Blaha; Salim S Virani; Josef Coresh; Christie M Ballantyne; Aaron R Folsom Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Michelle C Odden; Mark J Pletcher; Pamela G Coxson; Divya Thekkethala; David Guzman; David Heller; Lee Goldman; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: David J Collier; Neil R Poulter; Björn Dahlöf; Peter S Sever; Hans Wedel; Jan Buch; Mark J Caulfield Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: David Preiss; Sreenivasa Rao Kondapally Seshasai; Paul Welsh; Sabina A Murphy; Jennifer E Ho; David D Waters; David A DeMicco; Philip Barter; Christopher P Cannon; Marc S Sabatine; Eugene Braunwald; John J P Kastelein; James A de Lemos; Michael A Blazing; Terje R Pedersen; Matti J Tikkanen; Naveed Sattar; Kausik K Ray Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-06-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robert J Glynn; Wolfgang Koenig; Børge G Nordestgaard; James Shepherd; Paul M Ridker Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2010-04-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Brian R Ott; Lori A Daiello; Issa J Dahabreh; Beth A Springate; Kimberly Bixby; Manjari Murali; Thomas A Trikalinos Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-01-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Eric Bruckert; Michel Lièvre; Philippe Giral; Gaetano Crepaldi; Luis Masana; Matthias Vrolix; Eran Leitersdorf; Sylvie Dejager Journal: Am J Geriatr Cardiol Date: 2003 Jul-Aug
Authors: Ariela R Orkaby; Jane A Driver; Yuk-Lam Ho; Bing Lu; Lauren Costa; Jacqueline Honerlaw; Ashley Galloway; Jason L Vassy; Daniel E Forman; J Michael Gaziano; David R Gagnon; Peter W F Wilson; Kelly Cho; Luc Djousse Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Zhen Zhou; Richard Ofori-Asenso; Andrea J Curtis; Monique Breslin; Rory Wolfe; John J McNeil; Anne M Murray; Michael E Ernst; Christopher M Reid; Jessica E Lockery; Robyn L Woods; Andrew M Tonkin; Mark R Nelson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Kathleen Saavedra; Karla Leal; Nicolás Saavedra; Yalena Prado; Isis Paez; Carmen G Ubilla; Gabriel Rojas; Luis A Salazar Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Sonal Singh; Susan Zieman; Alan S Go; Stephen P Fortmann; Nanette K Wenger; Jerome L Fleg; Barbara Radziszewska; Neil J Stone; Sophia Zoungas; Jerry H Gurwitz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kamal Awad; Maged Mohammed; Mahmoud Mohamed Zaki; Abdelrahman I Abushouk; Gregory Y H Lip; Michael J Blaha; Carl J Lavie; Peter P Toth; J Wouter Jukema; Naveed Sattar; Maciej Banach Journal: BMC Med Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 8.775