Literature DB >> 21693744

Risk of incident diabetes with intensive-dose compared with moderate-dose statin therapy: a meta-analysis.

David Preiss1, Sreenivasa Rao Kondapally Seshasai, Paul Welsh, Sabina A Murphy, Jennifer E Ho, David D Waters, David A DeMicco, Philip Barter, Christopher P Cannon, Marc S Sabatine, Eugene Braunwald, John J P Kastelein, James A de Lemos, Michael A Blazing, Terje R Pedersen, Matti J Tikkanen, Naveed Sattar, Kausik K Ray.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that statin therapy is associated with excess risk of developing diabetes mellitus.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether intensive-dose statin therapy is associated with increased risk of new-onset diabetes compared with moderate-dose statin therapy. DATA SOURCES: We identified relevant trials in a literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 1, 1996, through March 31, 2011). Unpublished data were obtained from investigators. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled end-point trials that compared intensive-dose statin therapy with moderate-dose statin therapy and included more than 1000 participants who were followed up for more than 1 year. DATA EXTRACTION: Tabular data provided for each trial described baseline characteristics and numbers of participants developing diabetes and experiencing major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, coronary revascularization). We calculated trial-specific odds ratios (ORs) for new-onset diabetes and major cardiovascular events and combined these using random-effects model meta-analysis. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) statistic.
RESULTS: In 5 statin trials with 32,752 participants without diabetes at baseline, 2749 developed diabetes (1449 assigned intensive-dose therapy, 1300 assigned moderate-dose therapy, representing 2.0 additional cases in the intensive-dose group per 1000 patient-years) and 6684 experienced cardiovascular events (3134 and 3550, respectively, representing 6.5 fewer cases in the intensive-dose group per 1000 patient-years) over a weighted mean (SD) follow-up of 4.9 (1.9) years. Odds ratios were 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.22; I(2) = 0%) for new-onset diabetes and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.94; I(2) = 74%) for cardiovascular events for participants receiving intensive therapy compared with moderate-dose therapy. As compared with moderate-dose statin therapy, the number needed to harm per year for intensive-dose statin therapy was 498 for new-onset diabetes while the number needed to treat per year for intensive-dose statin therapy was 155 for cardiovascular events.
CONCLUSION: In a pooled analysis of data from 5 statin trials, intensive-dose statin therapy was associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes compared with moderate-dose statin therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21693744     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  398 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenesis and management of the diabetogenic effect of statins: a role for adiponectin and coenzyme Q10?

Authors:  Dick C Chan; Jing Pang; Gerald F Watts
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Long-standing statin therapy and the risk of new-onset diabetes in the elderly: collateral damage caused by preventive medicine?

Authors:  Luca Mascitelli; Mark R Goldstein
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Initiation of statin therapy: are there age limits?

Authors:  Dipan A Desai; Sammy Zakaria; Pamela Ouyang
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Pharmacotherapy: statins and new-onset diabetes mellitus--a matter for debate.

Authors:  Vassilios G Athyros; Dimitri P Mikhailidis
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  Genome-wide gene-environment interactions on quantitative traits using family data.

Authors:  Colleen M Sitlani; Josée Dupuis; Kenneth M Rice; Fangui Sun; Achilleas N Pitsillides; L Adrienne Cupples; Bruce M Psaty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Chronic HMGCR/HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor treatment contributes to dysglycemia by upregulating hepatic gluconeogenesis through autophagy induction.

Authors:  Hye Jin Wang; Jae Yeo Park; Obin Kwon; Eun Yeong Choe; Chul Hoon Kim; Kyu Yeon Hur; Myung-Shik Lee; Mijin Yun; Bong Soo Cha; Young-Bum Kim; Hyangkyu Lee; Eun Seok Kang
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 16.016

Review 7.  Coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Doron Aronson; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.213

Review 8.  Statins for Primary Prevention in Older Adults-Moving Toward Evidence-Based Decision-Making.

Authors:  Sonal Singh; Susan Zieman; Alan S Go; Stephen P Fortmann; Nanette K Wenger; Jerome L Fleg; Barbara Radziszewska; Neil J Stone; Sophia Zoungas; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Statins and New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Complications: A Retrospective Cohort Study of US Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Ishak Mansi; Christopher R Frei; Chen-Pin Wang; Eric M Mortensen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Quantifying the effect of statin use in pre-diabetic phenotypes discovered through association rule mining.

Authors:  John R Schrom; Pedro J Caraballo; M Regina Castro; György J Simon
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.