Grace Younes1, Eyal Goldschmidt2, Ariel Zilberlicht3, Ron Auslender3, Nir Haya3, Yoram Abramov3. 1. Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Carmel Medical Center, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine,Technion University, 7 Michal St., Haifa, Israel, 34362. graceyounes@gmail.com. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bnei Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel. 3. Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Carmel Medical Center, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine,Technion University, 7 Michal St., Haifa, Israel, 34362.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Our aim was to assess the prevalence of vaginal adhesions after transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries and evaluate relevant risk factors and impact on surgical outcome and sexual function. METHODS: This was a retrospective study examining medical records of all patients undergoing transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) at our institution between January 2006 and December 2007. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety -nine women were included in the study, of whom 165 had a comprehensive pre- and postoperative follow-up assessment and were available for final analysis. Vaginal adhesions were reported in 18 (10.9%) women during the first follow-up visit 36 ± 34 days postoperatively. Adhesions were reported to be successfully separated manually in all cases during pelvic examination. Patients with or without vaginal adhesions showed no statistically significant differences in demographic, obstetric, or clinical characteristics or in severity of prolapse. No statistically significant correlation was found between any specific surgical procedure and the risk of developing vaginal adhesions. Rates of prolapse recurrence, postoperative vaginal narrowing and dyspareunia were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal adhesion formation is a relatively common complication after transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries unrelated to preoperative degree of prolapse or to the type of surgery. If adhesions are separated manually at an early stage, surgical outcome and sexual function do not seem to be adversely affected.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Our aim was to assess the prevalence of vaginal adhesions after transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries and evaluate relevant risk factors and impact on surgical outcome and sexual function. METHODS: This was a retrospective study examining medical records of all patients undergoing transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) at our institution between January 2006 and December 2007. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety -nine women were included in the study, of whom 165 had a comprehensive pre- and postoperative follow-up assessment and were available for final analysis. Vaginal adhesions were reported in 18 (10.9%) women during the first follow-up visit 36 ± 34 days postoperatively. Adhesions were reported to be successfully separated manually in all cases during pelvic examination. Patients with or without vaginal adhesions showed no statistically significant differences in demographic, obstetric, or clinical characteristics or in severity of prolapse. No statistically significant correlation was found between any specific surgical procedure and the risk of developing vaginal adhesions. Rates of prolapse recurrence, postoperative vaginal narrowing and dyspareunia were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal adhesion formation is a relatively common complication after transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries unrelated to preoperative degree of prolapse or to the type of surgery. If adhesions are separated manually at an early stage, surgical outcome and sexual function do not seem to be adversely affected.
Authors: Jeanette S Brown; L Elaine Waetjen; Leslee L Subak; David H Thom; Stephen Van den Eeden; Eric Vittinghoff Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 8.661