Literature DB >> 12355291

Safety and efficacy of sacrospinous vault suspension.

D Lovatsis1, H P Drutz.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to determine the success rate and complications of sacrospinous vault suspension when performed by an experienced surgeon. Retrospective data collection was performed for 293 women who had undergone sacrospinous vault suspension at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, between November 1993 and 19 December 1998. Primary outcome measures were complication rates (acute and long term) and success rate, with failure defined as any degree of vault prolapse requiring repeat operation, any degree of symptomatic isolated vault prolapse, or any vault prolapse at or beyond the introitus. Statistical analysis was performed using simple descriptive techniques. During the study period, 305 sacrospinous vault suspensions were performed; however, 12 cases were excluded because of inaccessible records. This study therefore comprised the remaining 293 cases: 129 at the time of vaginal hysterectomy, 5 with transvaginal cervical stump excision, 155 for post-hysterectomy vault prolapse, and 4 without hysterectomy. Two hundred had follow-up of 1 year or more, with maximum follow-up 5 years. Of these 200, there were 6 failures (3%). There were no acute hemorrhages and no deaths. There was a complaint of postoperative right buttock pain in 18 of the 293 procedures (6.1%), with this persisting on a chronic basis in 3 patients. Eight patients complained of new-onset postoperative dyspareunia. Nine patients had postoperative stress urinary incontinence, and 14 patients had de novo anal incontinence. Postoperatively, there were 17 patients with a cystocele and 7 with a rectocele. There were three other complications: one pelvic hematoma at the sacrospinous suspension site, one right foot drop which spontaneously resolved, and one case of pain in the right sciatic nerve distribution which spontaneously resolved. Forty-three patients complained of anal incontinence preoperatively, and 38 (88.4%) had the symptoms resolved postoperatively. It was concluded that, when performed by a surgeon experienced in the procedure, sacrospinous vault suspension is safe and effective, with a successful result at 1 year in more than 90% of cases, and rare major complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12355291     DOI: 10.1007/s001920200067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  12 in total

1.  Is standardised vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation a safe teaching procedure for residents?

Authors:  Axel Sauerwald; Inke Bruns; Barbara Peveling; Hendrik Brunke; Friedrich Wolff
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Anatomic variations of the pelvic floor nerves adjacent to the sacrospinous ligament: a female cadaver study.

Authors:  George Lazarou; Bogdan A Grigorescu; Todd R Olson; Sherry A Downie; Kenneth Powers; Magdy S Mikhail
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-11-24

3.  High levator myorraphy versus uterosacral ligament suspension for vaginal vault fixation: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Franca Natale; Chiara La Penna; Anna Padoa; Massimo Agostini; Massimo Panei; Mauro Cervigni
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Comparative analysis of overall cost and rate of healthcare utilization among apical prolapse procedures.

Authors:  Lannah L Lua; Erika D Vicente; Prathamesh Pathak; Daniel Lybbert; Vani Dandolu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Posterior intravaginal slingplasty: efficacy and complications in a continuous series of 118 cases.

Authors:  Stefano Cosma; Mario Preti; Marco Mitidieri; Paolo Petruzzelli; Federica Possavino; Guido Menato
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Bilateral sacrospinous fixation without hysterectomy: 18-month follow-up.

Authors:  Mehmet Baki Şentürk; Hakan Güraslan; Yusuf Çakmak; Murat Ekin
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01

7.  Pelvic floor consequences of cesarean delivery on maternal request in women with a single birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Julie S Ivy; Divya A Patel; Sejal N Patel; Dean G Smith; Scott B Ransom; Dee Fenner; John O L Delancey
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 8.  Apical prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Vaginal adhesions after transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries: prevalence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Grace Younes; Eyal Goldschmidt; Ariel Zilberlicht; Ron Auslender; Nir Haya; Yoram Abramov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Long-term follow-up after vaginal sacrospinous fixation: patient satisfaction, anatomical results and quality of life.

Authors:  Th Aigmueller; P Riss; A Dungl; H Bauer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-02-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.