Literature DB >> 26241692

Estimation of Hydrogen-Exchange Protection Factors from MD Simulation Based on Amide Hydrogen Bonding Analysis.

In-Hee Park1, John D Venable1, Caitlin Steckler1,2, Susan E Cellitti1, Scott A Lesley1,3,2, Glen Spraggon1, Ansgar Brock1.   

Abstract

Hydrogen exchange (HX) studies have provided critical insight into our understanding of protein folding, structure, and dynamics. More recently, hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry (HX-MS) has become a widely applicable tool for HX studies. The interpretation of the wealth of data generated by HX-MS experiments as well as other HX methods would greatly benefit from the availability of exchange predictions derived from structures or models for comparison with experiment. Most reported computational HX modeling studies have employed solvent-accessible-surface-area based metrics in attempts to interpret HX data on the basis of structures or models. In this study, a computational HX-MS prediction method based on classification of the amide hydrogen bonding modes mimicking the local unfolding model is demonstrated. Analysis of the NH bonding configurations from molecular dynamics (MD) simulation snapshots is used to determine partitioning over bonded and nonbonded NH states and is directly mapped into a protection factor (PF) using a logistics growth function. Predicted PFs are then used for calculating deuteration values of peptides and compared with experimental data. Hydrogen exchange MS data for fatty acid synthase thioesterase (FAS-TE) collected for a range of pHs and temperatures was used for detailed evaluation of the approach. High correlation between prediction and experiment for observable fragment peptides is observed in the FAS-TE and additional benchmarking systems that included various apo/holo proteins for which literature data were available. In addition, it is shown that HX modeling can improve experimental resolution through decomposition of in-exchange curves into rate classes, which correlate with prediction from MD. Successful rate class decompositions provide further evidence that the presented approach captures the underlying physical processes correctly at the single residue level. This assessment is further strengthened in a comparison of residue resolved protection factor predictions for staphylococcal nuclease with NMR data, which was also used to compare prediction performance with other algorithms described in the literature. The demonstrated transferable and scalable MD based HX prediction approach adds significantly to the available tools for HX-MS data interpretation based on available structures and models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26241692      PMCID: PMC4587094          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  48 in total

1.  Assessing the Accuracy of Two Enhanced Sampling Methods Using EGFR Kinase Transition Pathways: The Influence of Collective Variable Choice.

Authors:  Albert C Pan; Thomas M Weinreich; Yibing Shan; Daniele P Scarpazza; David E Shaw
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 2.  Probing protein structure by amino acid-specific covalent labeling and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Vanessa Leah Mendoza; Richard W Vachet
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 10.946

3.  Quantitative assessment of protein structural models by comparison of H/D exchange MS data with exchange behavior accurately predicted by DXCOREX.

Authors:  Tong Liu; Dennis Pantazatos; Sheng Li; Yoshitomo Hamuro; Vincent J Hilser; Virgil L Woods
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Exploring protein kinase conformation using swarm-enhanced sampling molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Alessio Atzori; Neil J Bruce; Kepa K Burusco; Berthold Wroblowski; Pascal Bonnet; Richard A Bryce
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Regions of IkappaBalpha that are critical for its inhibition of NF-kappaB.DNA interaction fold upon binding to NF-kappaB.

Authors:  Stephanie M E Truhlar; Justin W Torpey; Elizabeth A Komives
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Hydrogen bonding stabilizes globular proteins.

Authors:  J K Myers; C N Pace
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  A statistical mechanical model for hydrogen exchange in globular proteins.

Authors:  D W Miller; K A Dill
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 8.  Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins.

Authors:  E N Baker; R E Hubbard
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.667

9.  Prediction of native-state hydrogen exchange from perfectly funneled energy landscapes.

Authors:  Patricio O Craig; Joachim Lätzer; Patrick Weinkam; Ryan M B Hoffman; Diego U Ferreiro; Elizabeth A Komives; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Modeling deuterium exchange behavior of ERK2 using pepsin mapping to probe secondary structure.

Authors:  K A Resing; A N Hoofnagle; N G Ahn
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.109

View more
  11 in total

1.  Blockade of Tim-3 binding to phosphatidylserine and CEACAM1 is a shared feature of anti-Tim-3 antibodies that have functional efficacy.

Authors:  Catherine A Sabatos-Peyton; James Nevin; Ansgar Brock; John D Venable; Dewar J Tan; Nasim Kassam; Fangmin Xu; John Taraszka; Luke Wesemann; Thomas Pertel; Nandini Acharya; Max Klapholz; Yassaman Etminan; Xiaomo Jiang; Yu-Hwa Huang; Richard S Blumberg; Vijay K Kuchroo; Ana C Anderson
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 8.110

2.  Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange within Adenosine Deaminase, a TIM Barrel Hydrolase, Identifies Networks for Thermal Activation of Catalysis.

Authors:  Shuaihua Gao; Emily J Thompson; Samuel L Barrow; Wenju Zhang; Anthony T Iavarone; Judith P Klinman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Thioesterase enzyme families: Functions, structures, and mechanisms.

Authors:  Benjamin T Caswell; Caio C de Carvalho; Hung Nguyen; Monikrishna Roy; Tin Nguyen; David C Cantu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Computational Structure Prediction for Antibody-Antigen Complexes From Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry: Challenges and Outlook.

Authors:  Minh H Tran; Clara T Schoeder; Kevin L Schey; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.786

5.  Interpreting Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Events in Proteins Using Atomistic Simulations: Case Studies on Regulators of G-Protein Signaling Proteins.

Authors:  Hossein Mohammadiarani; Vincent S Shaw; Richard R Neubig; Harish Vashisth
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Dramatic Shape Changes Occur as Cytochrome c Folds.

Authors:  Serdal Kirmizialtin; Felicia Pitici; Alfredo E Cardenas; Ron Elber; D Thirumalai
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Coarse-Grained Conformational Sampling of Protein Structure Improves the Fit to Experimental Hydrogen-Exchange Data.

Authors:  Didier Devaurs; Dinler A Antunes; Malvina Papanastasiou; Mark Moll; Daniel Ricklin; John D Lambris; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2017-03-10

8.  Interpretation of HDX Data by Maximum-Entropy Reweighting of Simulated Structural Ensembles.

Authors:  Richard T Bradshaw; Fabrizio Marinelli; José D Faraldo-Gómez; Lucy R Forrest
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  A novel Porphyromonas gingivalis enzyme: An atypical dipeptidyl peptidase III with an ARM repeat domain.

Authors:  Altijana Hromić-Jahjefendić; Nina Jajčanin Jozić; Saša Kazazić; Marina Grabar Branilović; Zrinka Karačić; Jörg H Schrittwieser; Krishna Mohan Padmanabha Das; Marko Tomin; Monika Oberer; Karl Gruber; Marija Abramić; Sanja Tomić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  POPPeT: a New Method to Predict the Protection Factor of Backbone Amide Hydrogens.

Authors:  Jürgen Claesen; Argyris Politis
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.109

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.