| Literature DB >> 29308307 |
Catherine A Sabatos-Peyton1, James Nevin2, Ansgar Brock3, John D Venable3, Dewar J Tan2, Nasim Kassam2, Fangmin Xu4, John Taraszka4, Luke Wesemann2, Thomas Pertel2, Nandini Acharya2, Max Klapholz2, Yassaman Etminan2, Xiaomo Jiang1, Yu-Hwa Huang5, Richard S Blumberg5, Vijay K Kuchroo2, Ana C Anderson2.
Abstract
Both in vivo data in preclinical cancer models and in vitro data with T cells from patients with advanced cancer support a role for Tim-3 blockade in promoting effective anti-tumor immunity. Consequently, there is considerable interest in the clinical development of antibody-based therapeutics that target Tim-3 for cancer immunotherapy. A challenge to this clinical development is the fact that several ligands for Tim-3 have been identified: galectin-9, phosphatidylserine, HMGB1, and most recently, CEACAM1. These observations raise the important question of which of these multiple receptor:ligand relationships must be blocked by an anti-Tim-3 antibody in order to achieve therapeutic efficacy. Here, we have examined the properties of anti-murine and anti-human Tim-3 antibodies that have shown functional efficacy and find that all antibodies bind to Tim-3 in a manner that interferes with Tim-3 binding to both phosphatidylserine and CEACAM1. Our data have implications for the understanding of Tim-3 biology and for the screening of anti-Tim-3 antibody candidates that will have functional properties in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: HDxMS; Tim-3; antibody; checkpoint receptor; ligand
Year: 2017 PMID: 29308307 PMCID: PMC5749620 DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1385690
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncoimmunology ISSN: 2162-4011 Impact factor: 8.110