Literature DB >> 26240825

Cochlear Implant and Its Related Science.

Chung-Feng Hwang1, Yang Chen2, Hung-Ching Lin3, Prepageran Narayanan4, Seung-Ha Oh5, Eric Truy6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26240825      PMCID: PMC4512515          DOI: 10.1155/2015/683967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


× No keyword cloud information.
The prevalence of hearing loss (presbycusis) is 35–50% in those aged 65 years or older; consequently, hearing assistant devices become more and more important [1]. Cochlear implantation (CI) is believed to be one of the most important technologic achievements to have occurred in the 20th century for the treatment of profound hearing loss, continually improved since its approval by the International Consensus Conference in 1995 [2]. Recent advances in biology and medicine have introduced new concepts in the study of CI and its related science. Many changes have taken place including improvements in hardware technique, expansion of candidacy, and clinical outcome. The cornucopia of all novel technologies and approaches serves as important blessings for hearing-impaired people. This special issue is to exhibit the diversity and advances in recent progress that contributes to the different subspecialties of CI and its related science. It has motivated intense investigation on developing stem cell therapy as a new therapeutic strategy, for example, through the transplantation of stem cells into the inner ear for hearing restoration [3]. H.-C. Chen et al. investigated the long-term effect of hypoxia on stemness and the bioenergetic status of cochlear stem/progenitor cells cultured at different low oxygen tensions. Recent advances in hearing preservation studies have introduced new concepts and technologies to be applied in CI [4, 5]. To develop skills sufficient for hearing preservation CI surgery, surgeons need to perform several electrode insertion trials in ex vivo temporal bones, thereby consuming relatively expensive electrode carriers. J.-P. Kobler et al. design low-cost dummy electrodes that are cheap alternatives for surgical training and for in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo research purposes. P. T. Bhatti et al. also present an effective method for tailoring the flexibility of a commercial thin-film polymer electrode array for intracochlear electrical stimulation. The benefits of residual hearing preservation in cochlear implant recipients have promoted the development of atraumatic surgeries. The surgeons prefer round window approach to preserve low frequency hearing [6]. The incidence and severity of intracochlear trauma were not influenced by electrode array insertion through the anterosuperior or anteroinferior quadrant of the round window membrane. A bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) or bone-anchored hearing device is a type of hearing aid based on bone conduction [7, 8]. They are more expensive than conventional hearing aids, and their placement involves invasive surgery which carries a risk of complications [8]. The use of a wide fixture implant and the nonskin thinning surgical technique indicates that the combination is a safe procedure with good stability and no abutment losses in M. Hultcrantz's research. The diagnostic value of high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before CI is very high [9]. M. Busi et al. suggest that CI is a safe and effective procedure even for patients with brain and inner ear abnormalities at neuroimaging investigations with HRCT and MRI. Nonetheless, common cavity and stenosis of the internal auditory canal (less than 2 mm) are negative prognostic factors even if brain lesions are absent. Limiting the assessment of CI performance strictly to speech perception improvement does not properly evaluate the characteristics of the prosthesis-neural interface. Electrophysiological testing should provide a more accurate proxy of the interaction between the electrodes of the CI and the auditory neurons. F. Venail et al. modeled the activation of auditory neurons in CI recipients. Distribution of Neural Responses Telemetry residues could provide a proxy of auditory neurons functioning in implanted cochleas. The outcome of CI varies over a wide range among pediatric patients [10]. M. Park et al. assess the correlation between performance intelligence and postoperative CI outcome. Performance intelligence, especially social cognition, was strongly related to the postoperative CI outcome. Therefore, auditory rehabilitation, including social rehabilitation, should maximize the postoperative CI outcomes. According to H.-S. Hsieh et al., implanted children tend to write stories that are shorter, worse organized, and without a plot, while formulating morphosyntactically correct sentences. Special attention is required on their auditory and language performances, which could be the underlying causes of the written language problems. In this special issue, we collected both basic and clinical original research articles stimulating the continuing efforts to understand the cochlear implant technology, the development of strategies to treat deafness, and the evaluation of outcomes. It is our wish to increase interest in CI and its related science research with this special issue and further accelerate the development of novel therapies for hearing impairment.
  10 in total

1.  [The history of cochlear implantation: from Volta to multichannel-intracochlear stimulation].

Authors:  Katrin Jaekel; B Richter; R Laszig
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.057

2.  MRI versus CT in assessment of cochlear patency in cochlear implant candidates.

Authors:  Robert Bettman; Erik Beek; Adriaan Van Olphen; Frans Zonneveld; Egbert Huizing
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Comparison of Mandarin tone and speech perception between advanced combination encoder and continuous interleaved sampling speech-processing strategies in children.

Authors:  Chung-Feng Hwang; Hsiao-Chuan Chen; Chao-Hui Yang; Jyh-Ping Peng; Chia-Hui Weng
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Transplantation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells into the cochlea.

Authors:  Koji Nishimura; Takayuki Nakagawa; Kazuya Ono; Hideaki Ogita; Tatsunori Sakamoto; Norio Yamamoto; Keisuke Okita; Shinya Yamanaka; Juichi Ito
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 5.  Challenges and opportunities in presbycusis.

Authors:  Kourosh Parham; Brian J McKinnon; David Eibling; George A Gates
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 6.  Bone-anchored hearing aids versus conventional hearing aids.

Authors:  Rupan Banga; Rebecca Lawrence; Andrew Reid; Ann-Louise McDermott
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-08

Review 7.  Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids for bilateral permanent conductive hearing loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Renée M Janssen; Paul Hong; Neil K Chadha
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Wolfgang Gstoettner; Jan Kiefer; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Stefan Pok; Silke Peters; Oliver Adunka
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach.

Authors:  Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Anna Piotrowska; Ilona Anderson
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 10.  Hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Priscila Carvalho Miranda; André Luiz Lopes Sampaio; Rafaela Aquino Fernandes Lopes; Alessandra Ramos Venosa; Carlos Augusto Costa Pires de Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-03
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Geerte G J Ramakers; Yvette E Smulders; Alice van Zon; Gijsbert A Van Zanten; Wilko Grolman; Inge Stegeman
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2017-11-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.