Literature DB >> 17364328

Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach.

Henryk Skarzynski1, Artur Lorens, Anna Piotrowska, Ilona Anderson.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: Successful hearing preservation is possible in individuals with excellent low frequency hearing. This is possible due to the partial insertion of an atraumatic electrode using an atraumatic round window surgical technique.
OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the round window surgical technique used to preserve excellent low frequency hearing in patients receiving partially inserted MED-EL cochlear implant electrodes. Results of preserved low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The surgical approach is described in detail. Ten subjects received a partial insertion of a standard electrode, using the round window approach. Pure tone audiometry was conducted in the implanted and non-implanted ear preoperatively, at implant fitting and then at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after initial device fitting.
RESULTS: Results show hearing preservation in 9 of the 10 subjects. One subject lost all hearing 2 weeks after cochlear implantation. Hearing has remained essentially stable up to the 1 year postoperative period. Eight of the nine subjects use the cochlear implant together with their natural low frequency hearing; one subject uses a hearing aid in the implanted ear to amplify the low frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17364328     DOI: 10.1080/00016480500488917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  38 in total

Review 1.  MED-EL Cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hochmair; Peter Nopp; Claude Jolly; Marcus Schmidt; Hansjörg Schösser; Carolyn Garnham; Ilona Anderson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

Review 2.  Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

3.  Impact of the round window membrane accessibility on hearing preservation in adult cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Marjan Mirsalehi; Saleh Mohebbi; Mahsa Ghajarzadeh; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  A systematic review of electric-acoustic stimulation: device fitting ranges, outcomes, and clinical fitting practices.

Authors:  Paola V Incerti; Teresa Y C Ching; Robert Cowan
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-03

5.  Using the shortwave infrared to image middle ear pathologies.

Authors:  Jessica A Carr; Tulio A Valdez; Oliver T Bruns; Moungi G Bawendi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Cochlear implantation through the round window with a straight slotted electrode array: optimizing the surgical procedure.

Authors:  Thierry Mom; Aurélie Bachy; Aubry Houette; Yoann Pavier; Rémy Pastourel; Jean Gabrillargues; Nicolas Saroul; Laurent Gilain; Paul Avan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Residual hearing preservation after pediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ryan F Brown; Timothy E Hullar; Jamie H Cadieux; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Response Changes During Insertion of a Cochlear Implant Using Extracochlear Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Christopher K Giardina; Tatyana E Khan; Stephen H Pulver; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Optimal cochlear implant insertion vectors.

Authors:  Xenia Meshik; Timothy A Holden; Richard A Chole; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.