Literature DB >> 21389713

Bone-anchored hearing aids versus conventional hearing aids.

Rupan Banga, Rebecca Lawrence, Andrew Reid, Ann-Louise McDermott.   

Abstract

Hearing amplification technology has been evolving since the 19th century. Currently in most audiology departments, the mainstay of hearing rehabilitation is performed with conventional air and bone conduction aids. These are cost-effective, non-invasive hearing aids but are not without their drawbacks. This chapter explores the advantages and disadvantages of conventional hearing aids compared with the bone-anchored hearing aids. Although the bone-anchored hearing aids are a more expensive invasive option, there is increasing evidence that the benefits outweigh the disadvantages. Users report improved quality of life, health status and audiological rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21389713     DOI: 10.1159/000323711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0065-3071


  1 in total

1.  Cochlear Implant and Its Related Science.

Authors:  Chung-Feng Hwang; Yang Chen; Hung-Ching Lin; Prepageran Narayanan; Seung-Ha Oh; Eric Truy
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.