Literature DB >> 26239663

Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in infants born at or near term.

Prashanth Bhat1, Olie Chowdhury2, Sandeep Shetty3, Simon Hannam4, Gerrard F Rafferty5, Janet Peacock6,7, Anne Greenough8,9.   

Abstract

Our aims were to determine whether volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) or pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) reduced the time to successful extubation and if any difference was explained by a lower work of breathing (WOB), better respiratory muscle strength or less thoracoabdominal asynchrony (TAA) and associated with fewer hypocarbic episodes. Infants born at ≥34 weeks of gestational age were randomised to VTV or PLV. The WOB was assessed by the transdiaphragmatic pressure time product, respiratory muscle strength by the maximum inflation (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) pressures and TAA assessed using uncalibrated respiratory inductance plethysmography. Forty infants, median gestational age of 39 (range 34-42) weeks, were recruited. The time to successful extubation did not differ between the two groups (median 25, range 2.5-312 h (VTV) versus 33.5, 1.312 h (PLV)) (p = 0.461). There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to the WOB, respiratory muscle strength or the TAA results. The median number of hypocarbic episodes was 1.5 (range 0-8) in the VTV group versus 4 (range 1-13) in the PLV group (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: In infants born at or near term, VTV compared to PLV did not reduce the time to successful extubation but was associated with significantly fewer hypocarbic episodes. WHAT IS KNOWN: In prematurely born infants, volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) compared to pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) reduces bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death. In addition, VTV is associated in prematurely born infants with lower incidences of pneumothorax, intraventricular haemorrhage and hypocarbic episodes. WHAT IS NEW: Despite a high morbidity, few studies have investigated optimum ventilation strategies for infants born at or near term. In a RCT, we have demonstrated VTV versus PLV in infants ≥34 weeks gestation was associated with significantly fewer hypocarbic episodes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extubation; Respiratory muscle strength; Thoracoabdominal asynchrony; Work of breathing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26239663     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-015-2596-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  20 in total

Review 1.  Volume-targeted ventilation is more suitable than pressure-limited ventilation for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wansheng Peng; Hongwei Zhu; Hua Shi; EnMei Liu
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Volume-targeted ventilation in infants born at or near term.

Authors:  Olie Chowdhury; Gerrard F Rafferty; Silke Lee; Simon Hannam; Anthony D Milner; Anne Greenough
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Two-year outcome of normal-birth-weight infants admitted to a Singapore neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  W B Lian; C L Yeo; L Y Ho
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.473

4.  Hypocarbia and adverse outcome in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Athina Pappas; Seetha Shankaran; Abbot R Laptook; John C Langer; Rebecca Bara; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Ronald N Goldberg; Abhik Das; Rosemary D Higgins; Jon E Tyson; Michele C Walsh
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  The epidemiology of respiratory failure in neonates born at an estimated gestational age of 34 weeks or more.

Authors:  Reese H Clark
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Severe respiratory disorders in term neonates.

Authors:  Jean-Bernard Gouyon; C Ribakovsky; C Ferdynus; C Quantin; P Sagot; B Gouyon
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.980

7.  Randomised trial of volume-targeted ventilation versus pressure-limited ventilation in acute respiratory failure in prematurely born infants.

Authors:  Olie Chowdhury; Deena-Shefali Patel; Simon Hannam; Silke Lee; Gerrard F Rafferty; Janet L Peacock; Anne Greenough
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.035

8.  Multicentre randomised controlled trial of high against low frequency positive pressure ventilation. Oxford Region Controlled Trial of Artificial Ventilation OCTAVE Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Randomized multicenter trial comparing synchronized and conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonates.

Authors:  G Bernstein; F L Mannino; G P Heldt; J D Callahan; D H Bull; A Sola; R L Ariagno; G L Hoffman; I D Frantz; B I Troche; J L Roberts; T V Dela Cruz; E Costa
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Neonatal ventilatory techniques - which are best for infants born at term?

Authors:  Olie Chowdhury; Anne Greenough
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 3.318

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in neonates.

Authors:  Claus Klingenberg; Kevin I Wheeler; Naomi McCallion; Colin J Morley; Peter G Davis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-17

2.  Implementing Volume-targeted Ventilation to Decrease Hypocarbia in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants during the First Week of Life: A Quality Improvement Project.

Authors:  Uduak S Akpan; Sunny Patel; Paige Driver; Dmitry Tumin
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2021-05-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.