Literature DB >> 8618177

Randomized multicenter trial comparing synchronized and conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonates.

G Bernstein1, F L Mannino, G P Heldt, J D Callahan, D H Bull, A Sola, R L Ariagno, G L Hoffman, I D Frantz, B I Troche, J L Roberts, T V Dela Cruz, E Costa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) and conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) in neonates. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: Level III neonatal intensive care units at six university or children's hospitals. PATIENTS: Three hundred twenty-seven infants receiving conventional IMV for respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, or meconium aspiration pneumonitis were randomly assigned a 7.5 +/- 6 hours of age to either continue with IMV or change to SIMV. Infants assigned to each mode of ventilation had similar birth weight (BW), gestational age, and Apgar scores at birth, and similar oxygenation indexes at randomization. They received similar surfactant therapy and had similar incidence of sepsis, seizures, secondary pneumonia, and necrotizing enterocolitis. In the infants with BW less than 1000 gm, more infants receiving IMV had surgical ligation of their patent ductus arteriosus than did those receiving SIMV (27 vs. 7 %; p = 0.02). ANALYSIS: Data was analyzed overall for all infants and also separately within three BW groups: less than 1000 gm, 1000 to 2000 gm, and more than 2000 gm. The 1000 to 2000 gm BW group was further analyzed in subgroups weighing 1000 to 1499 gm and 1500 to 2000 gm.
RESULTS: In all infants, at 1 hour after randomization, the infants receiving SIMV had a lower mean airway pressure than those receiving IMV (8.08 +/- 2.15 vs. 8.63 +/- 2.59; p<0.05), with similar fractions of inspired oxygen and oxygenation indexes. Infants whose BW was 1000 to 2000 gm at 0.5 hour required a lower fraction of inspired oxygen with SIMV than with IMV (0.52 +/- 0.20 vs. 0.62 +/- 0.27; p<0.05) and had better oxygenation at 1 hour, as shown by lower oxygenation indexes with SIMV than with IMV (6.14 +/- 4.17 vs. 9.42 +/- 8.41; p = 0.01). Infants whose BW was 1000 to 2000 gm received a lower number of unit doses of sedative/analgesic drugs per infant during the first 4 days of SIMV than did infants receiving IMV (3.8 +/- 3.4 vs 6.3 +/- 5.5 unit doses; p = 0.02). Infants whose BW was more than 2000 gm had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation with SIMV than with IMV (median, 72 vs 93 hours; p = 0.02). Three of the forty-six infants receiving IMV but none of the 47 infants receiving SIMV required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In the infants with BW less than 1000 gm, fewer infants treated with SIMV required supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks of postconceptional age than did those treated with IMV (47 vs 72%; p<0.05). In 83 infants whose lungs were mechanically ventilated for 14 days or longer, all with BW less than 2000 gm, those treated with SIMV regained their BW earlier than those treated with IMV (median, 21.5 vs 29 days; p<0.01). There were no differences in the rates of death, intraventricular hemorrhage (grades III and IV), air leak, need for pharmacologic paralysis, or need for supplemental oxygen at 28 days.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that SIMV was at least as efficacious as conventional IMV, and may have improved certain outcomes in BW-specific groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8618177     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70354-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  13 in total

Review 1.  Weaning from assisted ventilation: art or science?

Authors:  S K Sinha; S M Donn
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  International randomised controlled trial of patient triggered ventilation in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  J H Baumer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Randomised controlled trial of patient triggered and conventional fast rate ventilation in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  M W Beresford; N J Shaw; D Manning
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 4.  Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: what do we know in 2007?

Authors:  Louise S Owen; Colin J Morley; Peter G Davis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 5.  New modes of mechanical ventilation in the preterm newborn: evidence of benefit.

Authors:  Nelson Claure; Eduardo Bancalari
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  Effect of the Y-piece of the ventilation circuit on ventilation requirements in extremely low birth weight infants.

Authors:  M Wald; Valerie Jeitler; Karin Lawrenz; M Weninger; Lieselotte Kirchner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Ventilation strategies and outcome in randomised trials of high frequency ventilation.

Authors:  U H Thome; W A Carlo; F Pohlandt
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 5.747

8.  Respiratory support in meconium aspiration syndrome: a practical guide.

Authors:  Peter A Dargaville
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2012-02-23

9.  Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in infants born at or near term.

Authors:  Prashanth Bhat; Olie Chowdhury; Sandeep Shetty; Simon Hannam; Gerrard F Rafferty; Janet Peacock; Anne Greenough
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 10.  Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants.

Authors:  Anne Greenough; Thomas E Rossor; Adesh Sundaresan; Vadivelam Murthy; Anthony D Milner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.