Literature DB >> 26238572

Can dosimetric parameters predict acute hematologic toxicity in rectal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy?

Juefeng Wan1,2, Kaitai Liu3, Kaixuan Li4,5, Guichao Li6, Zhen Zhang7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To identify dosimetric parameters associated with acute hematologic toxicity (HT) in rectal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy.
METHODS: Ninety-three rectal cancer patients receiving concurrent capecitabine and pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were analyzed. Pelvic bone marrow (PBM) was contoured for each patient and divided into three subsites: lumbosacral spine (LSS), ilium, and lower pelvis (LP). The volume of each site receiving 5-40 Gy (V 5, V10, V15, V20, V30, and V40, respectively) as well as patient baseline clinical characteristics was calculated. The endpoint for hematologic toxicity was grade ≥ 2 (HT2+) leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia or thrombocytopenia. Logistic regression was used to analyze correlation between dosimetric parameters and grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity.
RESULTS: Twenty-four in ninety-three patients experienced grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity. Only the dosimetric parameter V40 of lumbosacral spine was correlated with grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity. Increased pelvic lumbosacral spine V40 (LSS-V40) was associated with an increased grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity (p = 0.041). Patients with LSS-V40 ≥ 60 % had higher rates of grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity than did patients with lumbosacral spine V40 < 60 % (38.3 %, 18/47 vs.13 %, 6/46, p =0.005). On univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, lumbosacral spine V40 and gender was also the variable associated with grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity. Female patients were observed more likely to have grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity than male ones (46.9 %, 15/32 vs 14.8 %, 9/61, p =0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Lumbosacral spine -V40 was associated with clinically significant grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity. Keeping the lumbosacral spine -V40 < 60 % was associated with a 13 % risk of grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity in rectal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26238572      PMCID: PMC4554292          DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0454-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1748-717X            Impact factor:   3.481


Introduction

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) [3, 10, 19, 20]. The delivery of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) based chemotherapy with radiotherapy reduces 5-year incidence of local recurrence compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone [11]. Park et al. demonstrated tumor response to neoadjuvant CRT was associated with 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS) [18]. However, myelosuppression is a major common side effect of CRT that could lead to treatment interruptions [9, 25]. Thus, the reduction of hematologic toxicity (HT) is an important goal. Pelvic radiotherapy may contribute to the development of HT. More than one-half of the body’s bone marrow is located in the os coxae, sacrum, proximal femora, and lower lumbar spine. Therefore, reducing pelvic bone marrow (PBM) irradiation may reduce HT, enabling improved delivery of chemotherapy, and, consequently, treatment efficacy. Several studies demonstrated a correlation between PBM dosimetric parameters with HT in patients with anal cancer and cervical cancer. Thus, recommended dose constraints to the LSS are V10 ≤ 80 %, and keeping the mean PBM dose < 22.5 Gy and <25 Gy is associated with a 5 % and 10 % risk of HT, respectively, in patients with anal cancer [5, 7]. Data from cervical cancer suggest that patients with PBM-V10 ≥ 90 % had higher rates of Grade 2 HT than did patients with PBM-V10 < 90 % [16]. The clinical significance and optimal technique of PBM sparing in rectal cancer patients, however, are still unknown. Here, we set out to identify PBM dosimetric parameters that correlate with HT in patients treated with CRT for rectal cancer.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 93 patients with LARC (cT3-T4 and/or cN+) who were treated with neoadjuvant CRT at our institution between September 2013 and August 2014. The study was approved by the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Institutional Review Board.

Combined chemoradiotherapy

Radiotherapy

Patients were immobilized in the prone or supine position and underwent a non-contrast planning CT scan with a 5-mm slices from the L3-L4 junction to 2 cm below the perineum. The image datasets were transferred to the PINNACLE planning system (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Milpitas, CA). The gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined as all known gross disease determined from CT and MRI. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the GTV plus areas considered at significant risk of harboring microscopic disease, including the mesorectum (perirectal fascia), presacral region, and internal iliac lymph node region. Based on our institution set-up data, the planning target volume (PTV) was generated by adding a 6-mm margin around the CTV in lateral and anterior-posterior directions, and an 8-mm margin in the superiorinferior direction [26] (Fig. 1). The critical normal organs at risk (OARs) outlined were the bladder, femoral heads, and small bowel.
Fig. 1

IMRT isodose distribution of representative axial (a) and sagittal (b) slice. PTV is shown in red. Blue, purple, and aurantium isodose lines represent 50, 47.5, and 40 Gy, respectively

IMRT isodose distribution of representative axial (a) and sagittal (b) slice. PTV is shown in red. Blue, purple, and aurantium isodose lines represent 50, 47.5, and 40 Gy, respectively The PTV was prescribed with a total of 50 Gy in 2Gy fractions. The intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans were generated using the inverse planning module of PINNACLE for a 6-MV linear accelerator, with seven coplanar fields. The D2 %, D50 %, and D98 % to PTV were set at 52.5 Gy, 50 Gy and 47.5 Gy, respectively. The dose of the OARs was set as low as possible and had to at least meet the following constraints: bladder, V45 ≤ 15 % and V40 ≤ 40 %; femoral heads, V45 ≤ 25 % and V40 ≤ 40 %; small bowel, V45 ≤ 65 cc, V40 ≤ 100 cc, and V35 ≤ 180 cc.

Concurrent chemotherapy

Capecitabine combined was administered concurrently with pelvic radiation. Capecitabine was given at a dose of 825 mg/m2 twice daily from Monday to Friday throughout the whole course of IMRT. Guidelines for capecitabine usage were as follows: for grade ≥ 2 toxicity (as defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.0), capecitabine was held, and appropriate symptomatic treatment was administered. Once toxicity resolved to grade 0 or 1, treatment was resumed.

Pelvic bone marrow delineation

For each patient, the external contour of all bones within the pelvis was used as a surrogate for PBM, and the PBM was further divided into three subsites, as described by Mell et al.: (1) ilium—including the iliac crests extending to the superior border of the femoral heads; (2) lower pelvis (LP)—consisting of the pubes, ischia, acetabula, and proximal femora, extending from the superior border of the femoral heads to the inferior border of the ischial tuberosities; and (3) lumbosacral spine (LSS)—extending from the most superior vertebral body contained in the planning treatment volume (usually L5) inferiorly to include the entire sacrum [16] (Fig. 2). Dose-volume Histograms (DVHs) were then generated, and the following parameters were recorded for the PBM and each subsite: volume, mean dose, and volume of each region receiving at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40 Gy (V5, V10, V15, V20, V30, and V40, respectively).
Fig. 2

Coronal section illustrating delineation of iliac (yellow), lumbosacral (green), and lower pelvic (blue) bone marrow

Coronal section illustrating delineation of iliac (yellow), lumbosacral (green), and lower pelvic (blue) bone marrow

Hematologic toxicity

The HT was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. The highest-grade toxicity for white blood count, absolute neutrophil count, hemoglobin, and platelets were recorded, with HT of grade ≥2 noted as an event (HT2+).

Statistical analysis

Age and dosimetric parameters were coded as continuous variables. Categorical variables included gender. Univariate logistic regression was used to test the correlation between clinical and dosimetric parameters with HT2+. Multivariate logistic regression models were then used to examine the effect of significant dosimetric parameters on HT2+. The incidence of HT2+ between male and female was compared by Pearson’s chi-square test.

Results

Patient characteristics

Baseline characteristics of the cohort are shown in Table 1. The median age at diagnosis was 57 years, with a male predominance. The majority of patients had clinical stage III tumors (79.6 %).
Table 1

Patient characteristics (n = 93)

CharacteristicNo. of patients (%)
Gender
 Male61(65.6)
 Female32(34.4)
Age in yrs
 Mean54.3
 Median57
 Range30–73
Clinical stage
 II19(20.4)
 III74(79.6)
Patient characteristics (n = 93)

Bone marrow dosimetric parameters

Table 2 summarizes the PBM dosimetric parameters. The median PBM mean dose was 29 Gy. The LSS was the smallest subsite of the PBM (22 %), and the LP was the largest subsite (46 %).
Table 2

Descriptive statistics of pelvic bone marrow dosimetric parameters

ParameterMedian value (range)
Pelvic bone marrow
  Volume (mL)1311(882-1663)
  Mean dose (cGy)2944(2402-3410)
  V5 (%)93(82-100)
  V10 (%)86(73-99)
  V15 (%)81(66-97)
  V20 (%)72(56-84)
  V30 (%)48(34-61)
  V40 (%)31(18-42)
Lumbosacral spine
  Volume (mL)285(213-387)
  Mean dose (cGy)3616(2505-4550)
  V5 (%)89(64-100)
  V10 (%)81(55-100)
  V15 (%)78(53-100)
  V20 (%)75(44-100)
  V30 (%)70(47-96)
  V40 (%)60(37-77)
Ilium
  Volume (mL)421(283-549)
  Mean dose (cGy)2797(2233-3546)
  V5 (%)90(77-100)
  V10 (%)82(66-99)
  V15 (%)77(61-99)
  V20 (%)68(54-93)
  V30 (%)46(30-73)
  V40 (%)26(14-42)
Low pelvis
  Volume (mL)593(385-808)
  Mean dose (cGy)2748(1928-3893)
  V5 (%)97(78-100)
  V10 (%)91(70-100)
  V15 (%)85(56-99)
  V20 (%)69(43-93)
  V30 (%)38(16-70)
  V40 (%)18(6-41)
Descriptive statistics of pelvic bone marrow dosimetric parameters Overall, 51 patients (51/93, 54.8 %) experienced leukopenia during treatment. The percentage of patients developing acute neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia was 25.8 %, 6.5 %, and 6.5 %, respectively. The percentage of patients with grade 2 or worse leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia was 25.8 %, 16.1 %, 2.2 %, and 1.1 %, respectively (Table 3). 24 patients (24/93, 25.8 %) experienced HT2+ during chemoradiotherapy. 21 patients (21/24, 87.5 %) experienced only grade 2 or worse leukopenia and/or neutropenia. 2 patients experienced (2/24, 8.3 %) both grade 2 or worse leukopenia/ neutropenia and anemia and 1 patients (1/24, 4.2 %) experienced both grade 2 or worse leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. HT2+ was frequently observed in females (male/female: 46.9/14.8 %) (p-value =0.001) (Table 4).
Table 3

Acute hematologic toxicity during chemoradiotherapy

ToxicityGrade 0Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3
Leukopenia42(45.2)27(29)21(22.6)3(3.2)
Neutropenia69(74.2)9(9.7)12(12.9)3(3.2)
Anemia87(93.5)4(4.3)1(1.1)1(1.1)
Thrombocytopenia87(93.5)5(5.4)1(1.1)0(0)
Table 4

Acute HT2+ during chemoradiotherapy

CharacteristicHT2+
Leukopenia and/or neutropenia21(21/24, 87.5 %)
Leukopenia and/or neutropenia + anemia2 (2/24, 8.3 %)
Leukopenia and/or neutropenia + thrombocytopenia1(1/24, 4.2 %)
Gender
  Male9(9/61, 14.8 %)
  Female15(15/32, 46.9 %)
Acute hematologic toxicity during chemoradiotherapy Acute HT2+ during chemoradiotherapy

Predictors of hematologic toxicity

On univariate analysis, LSS-V40 and gender were associated with HT2+ (Table 5). Patients with LSS-V40 ≥ 60 % had higher rates of HT2+ than did patients with LSS-V40 < 60 % (38.3 %, 18/47 vs.13 %, 6/46, p =0.005). The incidence of HT2+ was higher in female patients (46.9 %, 15/32) than in male patients (14.8 %, 9/61) (p-value =0.001). On multivariate analysis, LSS-V40 and gender retained statistical significance (Table 6).
Table 5

Univariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with the development of HT2+

Parameter P valueOdds ratio
Age0.1621.038
Gender0.0056.5
Pelvic bone marrow
  Mean dose0.7351.00
  V50.2271.1017
  V100.2791.064
  V150.6331.023
  V200.8750.993
  V300.8480.99
  V400.7641.018
Lumbosacral spine
  Mean dose0.3061.001
  V50.7121.017
  V100.4750.031
  V150.4621.031
  V200.4251.031
  V300.4061.035
  V400.0411.09
Ilium
  Mean dose0.4341.001
  V50.1151.092
  V100.0991.074
  V150.2611.045
  V200.6421.017
  V300.9211.004
  V400.7421.017
Low pelvis
  Mean dose0.7341.00
  V50.6541.028
  V100.8051.009
  V150.7590.991
  V200.6421.017
  V300.9211.004
  V400.3140.948
Table 6

Multivariate logistic regression analysis

Parameter P valueOdds ratio
Age0.570.913
Gender0.0176.581
Lumbosacral spine
 V400.0351.052
Ilium
 V50.6020.901
 V100.3561.166
Univariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with the development of HT2+ Multivariate logistic regression analysis

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the second study to predict acute HT in patients with rectal cancer receiving CRT. Yang TJ et al. found that coxal BM V45 and sacral BM V45 were associated with lower WBC and ANC nadirs [25]. In this study we demonstrated that LSS-V40 was associated with the development of HT2+ following chemoradiation to the pelvic. Additionally, HT2+ was more likely to occur in women. There have been several studies investigating the dosimetric parameters of PBM that correlate with the risk of HT on cervical and anal cancer [1, 4, 7, 16, 21]. Mell et al. found patients with PBM-V10 ≥ 90 % had higher rates of Grade 2 or worse leukopenia and neutropenia than did patients with BM-V10 < 90 % [16]. Rose et al. found V10 ≥ 95 % were more likely to experience Grade ≥ 3 leukopenia than were patients with V20 > 76 % in a similar patient cohort [21]. Albuquerque et al. studied 40 women who received CRT to treat cervical cancer and found the risk of HT2+ developing increases by a factor (odds ratio) of 4.5 if the V20 of the whole pelvis exceeds 80 % [1]. For patients with anal cancer, Cheng et al. demonstrated mean dose and low-dose radiation parameters (V5, V10, V15, V20) of whole bone or bone cavities of LSS were correlated most significantly with HT3+. An LSS mean dose of 23.5 Gy is associated with a 10 % risk of HT. Thus, recommended dose constraints to the LSS are V10 ≤ 80 % [7]. In our study we found LSS-V40 and gender were correlated with the risk of HT2+. Patients with LSS-V40 ≥ 60 % had higher rates of HT2+ than did patients with LSS-V40 < 60 % (38.3 %, 18/47 vs. 13 %, 6/46, p =0.005). The incidence of HT2+ was higher in female patients (46.9 %, 15/32) than in male patients (14.8 %, 9/61) (p-value =0.001). Tait et al. also found sex was the variable associated with any cardiac toxicity and pericardial effusion with multivariable logistic regression analysis in patients treated with chemoradiation therapy for esophageal carcinoma [23]. Given the evidence presented in this article for the existence of a sex-dependent hematologic toxicity difference, it is reasonable to seek explanations for potential mechanisms. Overall, it has been reported previously that women have a higher risk of myelotoxicity compared with men [2, 8, 12, 13]. This increased risk may likely be due to sex differences in pharmacokinetics and in pharmacodynamics [6, 24]. Makihara et al. found grade 4 neutropenia was frequently observed in females and gender could be considered as one of the important predictive factors associated with grade 4 neutropenia in patients receiving amrubicin monotherapy [15]. Milano et al. suggested that women were particularly prone to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency and there are data showing that the area under the curve, a measurement of plasma 5-FU level, is increased in women compared with men [14, 17]. Sloan et al. also reported women receiving 5-FU-based chemotherapy in a 5-day bolus schedule experience toxicity more frequently and with more severity than men [22]. In summary, there are no easy answers to the causes of increased hematologic toxicity of CRT in women and the reasons for this finding are likely multifactorial. Future studies should be directed to determine the mechanism behind the significant amount of women experiencing HT following CRT for rectal carcinoma. Based on our analysis, this specific finding was independent of the dose-volume relationship with toxicity and women did not demonstrate a significant difference in the dose of PBM compared with men. Potential analyses should investigate the rationale behind the lower tolerance of treatment in women versus men. This study had some limitations because of the nature of retrospective studies, the small sample size and the small number of female patients. Our findings will need to be validated in a larger, prospectively collected group of data. In addition, all patients were treated with IMRT, and the results may not be applicable to patients being treated with conventional radiation therapy techniques. Finally, we contoured the entire bone as opposed to the actual bone marrow. However, there are currently no readily available imaging studies that would help delineate active bone marrow.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this is the second study, to our knowledge, to identify dosimetric parameters associated with acute hematologic toxicity in rectal cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy. Lumbosacral spine V40 was associated with clinically significant grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity. Keeping the lumbosacral spine V40 < 60 % was associated with a 13 % risk of grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity in rectal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this report and any accompanying images.
  25 in total

Review 1.  The human hepatic cytochromes P450 involved in drug metabolism.

Authors:  S A Wrighton; J C Stevens
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  Gender difference in hematological toxicity among lung cancer patients receiving amrubicin monotherapy.

Authors:  Reiko Ando Makihara; Yoshinori Makino; Noboru Yamamoto; Nobuaki Yokote; Hiroshi Nokihara; Ikuo Sekine; Yuichiro Ohe; Tomohide Tamura; Hiroshi Yamamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 3.  Specificity of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and xenobiotic glucuronidation.

Authors:  B Burchell; C H Brierley; D Rance
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.037

4.  Normal tissue complication probability modeling of acute hematologic toxicity in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal.

Authors:  Jose G Bazan; Gary Luxton; Edward C Mok; Albert C Koong; Daniel T Chang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Gérard; Thierry Conroy; Franck Bonnetain; Olivier Bouché; Olivier Chapet; Marie-Thérèse Closon-Dejardin; Michel Untereiner; Bernard Leduc; Eric Francois; Jean Maurel; Jean-François Seitz; Bruno Buecher; Rémy Mackiewicz; Michel Ducreux; Laurent Bedenne
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Women experience greater toxicity with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeff A Sloan; Richard M Goldberg; Daniel J Sargent; Delfino Vargas-Chanes; Suresh Nair; Steven S Cha; Paul J Novotny; Michael A Poon; Michael J O'Connell; Charles L Loprinzi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Risk analysis of severe myelotoxicity with temozolomide: the effects of clinical and genetic factors.

Authors:  Terri S Armstrong; Yumei Cao; Michael E Scheurer; Elizabeth Vera-Bolaños; Rochelle Manning; Mehmet F Okcu; Melissa Bondy; Renke Zhou; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Clinical and Genetic Factors Associated With Severe Hematological Toxicity in Glioblastoma Patients During Radiation Plus Temozolomide Treatment: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lombardi; Enrica Rumiato; Roberta Bertorelle; Daniela Saggioro; Patrizia Farina; Alessandro Della Puppa; Fable Zustovich; Franco Berti; Valeria Sacchetto; Raffaella Marcato; Alberto Amadori; Vittorina Zagonel
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.339

9.  Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency and fluorouracil-related toxicity.

Authors:  G Milano; M C Etienne; V Pierrefite; M Barberi-Heyob; R Deporte-Fety; N Renée
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Concomitant boost IMRT-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for clinical stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma: results of a phase II study.

Authors:  Ji Zhu; Fangqi Liu; Weilie Gu; Peng Lian; Weiqi Sheng; Junyan Xu; Gang Cai; Debing Shi; Sanjun Cai; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  14 in total

1.  Dose to specific subregions of pelvic bone marrow defined with FDG-PET as a predictor of hematologic nadirs during concomitant chemoradiation in anal cancer patients.

Authors:  Pierfrancesco Franco; Francesca Arcadipane; Riccardo Ragona; Adriana Lesca; Elena Gallio; Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Paola Cassoni; Vincenzo Arena; Sara Bustreo; Riccardo Faletti; Nadia Rondi; Mario Morino; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Lumbar-sacral bone marrow dose modeling for acute hematological toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemo-radiation.

Authors:  Pierfrancesco Franco; Riccardo Ragona; Francesca Arcadipane; Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Paola Cassoni; Nadia Rondi; Mario Morino; Patrizia Racca; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity during concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy for anal cancer.

Authors:  P Franco; R Ragona; F Arcadipane; M Mistrangelo; P Cassoni; N Rondi; M Morino; P Racca; U Ricardi
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 4.  Chemoradiation and granulocyte-colony or granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF or GM-CSF): time to think out of the box?

Authors:  Marouan Benna; Jean-Baptiste Guy; Claire Bosacki; Omar Jmour; Majed Ben Mrad; Oleksandr Ogorodniitchouk; Saïd Soltani; Meiling Lan; Elisabeth Daguenet; Benoîte Mery; Sandrine Sotton; Nicolas Magné; Alexis Vallard
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Pelvic bone marrow sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy reduces the incidence of the hematologic toxicity of patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Fei Gu; Tianlong Ji; Jing Zhao; Guang Li
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Dose-volume parameters of MRI-based active bone marrow predict hematologic toxicity of chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Łukasz Kuncman; Konrad Stawiski; Michał Masłowski; Jakub Kucharz; Jacek Fijuth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Combined sunitinib and radiation therapy for preoperative treatment of soft tissue sarcoma: results of a phase I trial of the German interdisciplinary sarcoma group (GISG-03).

Authors:  Jens Jakob; Anna Simeonova; Bernd Kasper; Ulrich Ronellenfitsch; Geraldine Rauch; Frederik Wenz; Peter Hohenberger
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Radiotherapy dose led to a substantial prolongation of survival in patients with locally advanced rectosigmoid junction cancer: a large population based study.

Authors:  Xu Guan; Zheng Jiang; Tianyi Ma; Zheng Liu; Hanqing Hu; Zhixun Zhao; Dawei Song; Yinggang Chen; Guiyu Wang; Xishan Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-10

9.  Dosimetric analysis and comparison of reduced longitudinal cranial margins of VMAT-IMRT of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hendrik Dapper; Markus Oechsner; Stefan Münch; Kai Borm; Jan Peeken; Michael Mayinger; Stephanie E Combs; Daniel Habermehl
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Association of pre-surgery to pre-radiotherapy lymphocyte counts ratio with disease-free survival in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Hongen Xu; Guangxian You; Minjun Zhang; Tao Song; Haibo Zhang; Jia Yang; Yongshi Jia; Jianming Tang; Xiaodong Liang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.