Literature DB >> 26237154

A scatter correction method for contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital breast tomosynthesis.

Yihuan Lu1, Boyu Peng, Beverly A Lau, Yue-Houng Hu, David A Scaduto, Wei Zhao, Gene Gindi.   

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced dual energy digital breast tomosynthesis (CE-DE-DBT) is designed to image iodinated masses while suppressing breast anatomical background. Scatter is a problem, especially for high energy acquisition, in that it causes severe cupping artifact and iodine quantitation errors. We propose a patient specific scatter correction (SC) algorithm for CE-DE-DBT. The empirical algorithm works by interpolating scatter data outside the breast shadow into an estimate within the breast shadow. The interpolated estimate is further improved by operations that use an easily obtainable (from phantoms) table of scatter-to-primary-ratios (SPR)--a single SPR value for each breast thickness and acquisition angle. We validated our SC algorithm for two breast emulating phantoms by comparing SPR from our SC algorithm to that measured using a beam-passing pinhole array plate. The error in our SC computed SPR, averaged over acquisition angle and image location, was about 5%, with slightly worse errors for thicker phantoms. The SC projection data, reconstructed using OS-SART, showed a large degree of decupping. We also observed that SC removed the dependence of iodine quantitation on phantom thickness. We applied the SC algorithm to a CE-DE-mammographic patient image with a biopsy confirmed tumor at the breast periphery. In the image without SC, the contrast enhanced tumor was masked by the cupping artifact. With our SC, the tumor was easily visible. An interpolation-based SC was proposed by (Siewerdsen et al 2006 Med. Phys. 33 187-97) for cone-beam CT (CBCT), but our algorithm and application differ in several respects. Other relevant SC techniques include Monte-Carlo and convolution-based methods for CBCT, storage of a precomputed library of scatter maps for DBT, and patient acquisition with a beam-passing pinhole array for breast CT. Our SC algorithm can be accomplished in clinically acceptable times, requires no additional imaging hardware or extra patient dose and is easily transportable between sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26237154      PMCID: PMC4575809          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/16/6323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  21 in total

1.  Development of contrast digital mammography.

Authors:  Mia Skarpathiotakis; Martin J Yaffe; Aili K Bloomquist; Dan Rico; Serge Muller; Andreas Rick; Fanny Jeunehomme
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A software-based x-ray scatter correction method for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Steve Si Jia Feng; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Impact of flat panel-imager veiling glare on scatter-estimation accuracy and image quality of a commercial on-board cone-beam CT imaging system.

Authors:  Dimitrios Lazos; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Estimation of scattered radiation in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  O Diaz; D R Dance; K C Young; P Elangovan; P R Bakic; K Wells
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis: optimization of beam quality for dose and image quality.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Robert S Saunders
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Patient-specific scatter correction for flat-panel detector-based cone-beam CT imaging.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Stephen Brunner; Kai Niu; Sebastian Schafer; Kevin Royalty; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Roberta A Jong; Martin J Yaffe; Mia Skarpathiotakis; Rene S Shumak; Nathalie M Danjoux; Anoma Gunesekara; Donald B Plewes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  X-ray scatter correction in breast tomosynthesis with a precomputed scatter map library.

Authors:  Steve Si Jia Feng; Carl J D'Orsi; Mary S Newell; Rebecca L Seidel; Bhavika Patel; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study.

Authors:  Clarisse Dromain; Fabienne Thibault; Felix Diekmann; Eva M Fallenberg; Roberta A Jong; Marcia Koomen; R Edward Hendrick; Anne Tardivon; Alicia Toledano
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  3 in total

1.  A model-based scatter artifacts correction for cone beam CT.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Don Vernekohl; Jun Zhu; Luyao Wang; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Phantom-based study exploring the effects of different scatter correction approaches on the reconstructed images generated by contrast-enhanced stationary digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Connor Puett; Christina Inscoe; Yueh Z Lee; Otto Zhou; Jianping Lu
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-01

3.  Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images.

Authors:  Yuqi Sun; Simin Wang; Ziang Liu; Chao You; Ruimin Li; Ning Mao; Shaofeng Duan; Henry S Lynn; Yajia Gu
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.605

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.