Literature DB >> 26235749

Nuclear depolarization and absolute sensitivity in magic-angle spinning cross effect dynamic nuclear polarization.

Frédéric Mentink-Vigier1, Subhradip Paul, Daniel Lee, Akiva Feintuch, Sabine Hediger, Shimon Vega, Gaël De Paëpe.   

Abstract

Over the last two decades solid state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance has witnessed a breakthrough in increasing the nuclear polarization, and thus experimental sensitivity, with the advent of Magic Angle Spinning Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (MAS-DNP). To enhance the nuclear polarization of protons, exogenous nitroxide biradicals such as TOTAPOL or AMUPOL are routinely used. Their efficiency is usually assessed as the ratio between the NMR signal intensity in the presence and the absence of microwave irradiation εon/off. While TOTAPOL delivers an enhancement εon/off of about 60 on a model sample, the more recent AMUPOL is more efficient: >200 at 100 K. Such a comparison is valid as long as the signal measured in the absence of microwaves is merely the Boltzmann polarization and is not affected by the spinning of the sample. However, recent MAS-DNP studies at 25 K by Thurber and Tycko (2014) have demonstrated that the presence of nitroxide biradicals combined with sample spinning can lead to a depolarized nuclear state, below the Boltzmann polarization. In this work we demonstrate that TOTAPOL and AMUPOL both lead to observable depolarization at ≈110 K, and that the magnitude of this depolarization is radical dependent. Compared to the static sample, TOTAPOL and AMUPOL lead, respectively, to nuclear polarization losses of up to 20% and 60% at a 10 kHz MAS frequency, while Trityl OX63 does not depolarize at all. This experimental work is analyzed using a theoretical model that explains how the depolarization process works under MAS and gives new insights into the DNP mechanism and into the spin parameters, which are relevant for the efficiency of a biradical. In light of these results, the outstanding performance of AMUPOL must be revised and we propose a new method to assess the polarization gain for future radicals.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26235749     DOI: 10.1039/c5cp03457d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  38 in total

1.  Molecular Rationale for Improved Dynamic Nuclear Polarization of Biomembranes.

Authors:  Adam N Smith; Umar T Twahir; Thierry Dubroca; Gail E Fanucci; Joanna R Long
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Tuning nuclear depolarization under MAS by electron T1e.

Authors:  Alicia Lund; Asif Equbal; Songi Han
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.676

3.  Persistent Radicals of Self-assembled Benzophenone bis-Urea Macrocycles: Characterization and Application as a Polarizing Agent for Solid-state DNP MAS Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Baillie A DeHaven; John T Tokarski; Arthur A Korous; Frederic Mentink-Vigier; Thomas M Makris; Alexander M Brugh; Malcolm D E Forbes; Johan van Tol; Clifford R Bowers; Linda S Shimizu
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 5.236

Review 4.  New NMR tools for protein structure and function: Spin tags for dynamic nuclear polarization solid state NMR.

Authors:  Rivkah Rogawski; Ann E McDermott
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.013

5.  Adiabatic Solid Effect.

Authors:  Kong Ooi Tan; Ralph T Weber; Thach V Can; Robert G Griffin
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.475

6.  Direct dynamic nuclear polarization of 15N and 13C spins at 14.1 T using a trityl radical and magic angle spinning.

Authors:  Xiaoling Wang; Bethany G Caulkins; Gwladys Riviere; Leonard J Mueller; Frederic Mentink-Vigier; Joanna R Long
Journal:  Solid State Nucl Magn Reson       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.293

7.  Targetable Tetrazine-Based Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Agents for Biological Systems.

Authors:  Byung Joon Lim; Bryce E Ackermann; Galia T Debelouchina
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.164

8.  De novo prediction of cross-effect efficiency for magic angle spinning dynamic nuclear polarization.

Authors:  Frédéric Mentink-Vigier; Anne-Laure Barra; Johan van Tol; Sabine Hediger; Daniel Lee; Gaël De Paëpe
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.676

9.  Electron decoupling with cross polarization and dynamic nuclear polarization below 6 K.

Authors:  Erika L Sesti; Edward P Saliba; Nicholas Alaniva; Alexander B Barnes
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  NMR Signal Quenching from Bound Biradical Affinity Reagents in DNP Samples.

Authors:  Rivkah Rogawski; Ivan V Sergeyev; Yinglu Zhang; Timothy H Tran; Yongjun Li; Liang Tong; Ann E McDermott
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.