Literature DB >> 26233695

Comparative study of image quality between axial T2-weighted BLADE and turbo spin-echo MRI of the upper abdomen on 3.0 T.

Lin Zhang1,2, ChunMei Tian3, PeiYuan Wang2, Liang Chen2, XiJin Mao2, ShanShan Wang2, Xu Wang2, JingMin Dong2, Bin Wang4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare image quality of turbo spin-echo (TSE) with BLADE [which is also named periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER)] on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for upper abdomen.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved the retrospective evaluation of 103 patients (63 males, 40 females; age range 19-76 years; median age 53.8 years) who underwent 3.0 T MRI with both conventional TSE T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and BLADE TSE T2WI. Two radiologists assessed respiratory motion, gastrointestinal peristalsis, and vascular pulsation artifacts, as well as the sharpness of the liver and pancreas edges. Scores for all magnetic resonance (MR) images were recorded. Wilcoxon's rank test was used to compare hierarchical data. Cohen's kappa coefficient was adopted to analyze interobserver consistency.
RESULTS: Compared to TSE T2WI, BLADE TSE T2WI reduced all of the examined motion artifacts and increased the sharpness of the liver and pancreas edges (all P < 0.05). Medium to good interobserver consistency was obtained for evaluating these indicators. The scanning time of BLADE TSE T2WI was 4-16 s shorter than that of conventional TSE T2WI.
CONCLUSION: Compared to TSE sequence, the BLADE technique can reduce the respiratory motion, gastrointestinal peristalsis, and vascular pulsation artifacts, while decreasing the scanning time and improving the anatomic detail and image quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BLADE; Image artifact; MRI; PROPELLER

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233695     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-015-0463-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  21 in total

1.  Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging.

Authors:  J G Pipe
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis in infants, children, and adolescents.

Authors:  Kassa Darge; Sudha A Anupindi; Diego Jaramillo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  3.0-T MR imaging of the abdomen: comparison with 1.5 T.

Authors:  Kevin J Chang; Ihab R Kamel; Katarzyna J Macura; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Discrimination of axillary metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes with PROPELLER diffusion-weighted MR imaging in a metastatic breast cancer model and its correlation with cellularity.

Authors:  Wang Junping; Si Tongguo; Zhang Yunting; Yu Chunshui; Bai Renju
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Diagnostic pitfalls and artifacts in abdominal MR imaging: a review.

Authors:  S A Mirowitz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cholesteatoma diagnosis and follow-up. Study with the diffusion PROPELLER technique.

Authors:  Manuel Mateos-Fernández; Fernando Mas-Estellés; Carlos de Paula-Vernetta; Abel Guzmán-Calvete; Ricardo Villanueva-Martí; Constantino Morera-Pérez
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2012-10-23

7.  Artifact-reduced simultaneous MRI of multiple rats with liver cancer using PROPELLER.

Authors:  Masayuki Yamaguchi; Minoru Mitsuda; Kenji Ezawa; Ryutaro Nakagami; Toshihiro Furuta; Norio Sekine; Mamoru Niitsu; Hirofumi Fujii
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  3D GRASE PROPELLER: improved image acquisition technique for arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Huan Tan; W Scott Hoge; Craig A Hamilton; Matthias Günther; Robert A Kraft
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Comparison of PD BLADE with fat saturation (FS), PD FS and T2 3D DESS with water excitation (WE) in detecting articular knee cartilage defects.

Authors:  Eleftherios Lavdas; Theofilos Topalzikis; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Ioannis Kyriakis; Violeta Roka; Spiros Kostopoulos; Dimitrios Glotsos; Christos Zilidis; Sotiris Stathakis; Antonios Tsagkalis; Nikos Papanikolaou; Georgios Batsikas; Dimitrios L Arvanitis; Katerina Vassiou
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Should less motion sensitive T2-weighted BLADE TSE replace Cartesian TSE for female pelvic MRI?

Authors:  Johannes M Froehlich; Thierry Metens; Bianka Chilla; Nik Hauser; Markus Klarhoefer; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2012-09-26
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Modern magnetic resonance imaging of the liver].

Authors:  D M Hedderich; K Weiss; D Maintz; T Persigehl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Update Your Knowledge of Abdominal MRI: Recent Results, Which May Change Your Practice.

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.471

3.  MR Imaging-based Evaluation of Mesenteric Ischemia Caused by Strangulated Small Bowel Obstruction and Mesenteric Venous Occlusion: An Experimental Study Using Rabbits.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Norihisa Nitta; Shinichi Ota; Kai Takaki; Yugo Imai; Sayaka Misaki; Takayasu Iwai; Akinaga Sonoda; Ken-Ichi Mukaisho; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  A pilot study of native T1-mapping for focal pulmonary lesions in 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging: size estimation and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Shuyi Yang; Fei Shan; Qinqin Yan; Jie Shen; Peiyan Ye; Zhiyong Zhang; Yuxin Shi; Rengyin Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Improving MR sequence of 18F-FDG PET/MR for diagnosing and staging gastric Cancer: a comparison study to 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Dong Zheng; Yi Liu; Jiajin Liu; Ke Li; Mu Lin; Holger Schmidt; Baixuan Xu; Jiahe Tian
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.909

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.