Literature DB >> 26233276

Transapical and Transaortic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States.

Vinod H Thourani1, Hanna A Jensen2, Vasilis Babaliaros2, Rakesh Suri3, Sreekanth Vemulapalli4, David Dai4, J Matthew Brennan4, John Rumsfeld5, Fred Edwards6, E Murat Tuzcu7, Lars Svensson7, Wilson Y Szeto8, Howard Herrmann8, Ajay J Kirtane9, Susheel Kodali9, David J Cohen10, Stamatios Lerakis2, Chandan Devireddy2, Eric Sarin2, John Carroll5, David Holmes3, Frederick L Grover5, Mathew Williams11, Hersh Maniar12, David Shahian13, Michael Mack14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) cannot be carried out through transfemoral access, alternative access TAVR is indicated. The purpose of this study was to explore inhospital and 1-year outcomes of patients undergoing alternative access TAVR through the transapical (TA) or transaortic (TAo) techniques in the United States.
METHODS: Clinical records of 4,953 patients undergoing TA (n = 4,085) or TAo (n = 868) TAVR from 2011 to 2014 in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry were linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services hospital claims. Inhospital and 1-year clinical outcomes were stratified by operative risk; and the risk-adjusted association between access route and mortality, stroke, and heart failure repeat hospitalization was explored.
RESULTS: Mean age for all patients was 82.8 ± 6.8 years. The median STS predicted risk of mortality was significantly higher among patients undergoing TAo (8.8 versus 7.4, p < 0.001). When compared with TA, TAo was associated with an increased risk of unadjusted 30-day mortality (10.3% versus 8.8%) and 1-year mortality (30.3% versus 25.6%, p = 0.006). There were no significant differences between TAo and TA for inhospital stroke rate (2.2%), major vascular complications (0.3%), and 1-year heart failure rehospitalizations (15.7%). Examination of high-risk and inoperable subgroups showed that 1-year mortality was significantly higher for TAo patients classified as inoperable (p = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing TAo TAVR are older, more likely female, and have significantly higher STS predicted risk of mortality scores than patients operated on by TA access. There were no risk-adjusted differences between TA and TAo access in mortality, stroke, or readmission rates as long as 1 year after TAVR.
Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233276     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  15 in total

Review 1.  Alternate Access for TAVI: Stay Clear of the Chest.

Authors:  Pavel Overtchouk; Thomas Modine
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-09

2.  Management of severe aortic stenosis: the Singapore and Asian perspective.

Authors:  Edgar Lik Wui Tay; Jinghao Nicholas Ngiam; William Kf Kong; Kian-Keong Poh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 3.  Transapical approach in transcatheter cardiovascular interventions.

Authors:  Minoru Tabata
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-01-25

Review 4.  A Review of Alternative Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Michael N Young; Vikas Singh; Rahul Sakhuja
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-07-04

5.  Use of Medicare Claims to Identify Adverse Clinical Outcomes After Mitral Valve Repair.

Authors:  Angela Lowenstern; Steven J Lippmann; J Matthew Brennan; Tracy Y Wang; Lesley H Curtis; Ted Feldman; Donald D Glower; Bradley G Hammill; Sreekanth Vemulapalli
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.546

Review 6.  Access Options for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Unfavorable Aortoiliofemoral Anatomy.

Authors:  Jayendrakumar S Patel; Amar Krishnaswamy; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; Stephanie Mick; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Vascular Imaging Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Why and How?

Authors:  Damiano Caruso; Russell D Rosenberg; Carlo N De Cecco; Stefanie Mangold; Julian L Wichmann; Akos Varga-Szemes; Daniel H Steinberg; Andrea Laghi; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Direct aortic route versus transaxillary route for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-An Lee; I-Li Su; Shao-Wei Chen; Victor Chien-Chia Wu; Dong-Yi Chen; Pao-Hsien Chu; An-Hsun Chou; Yu-Ting Cheng; Pyng-Jing Lin; Feng-Chun Tsai
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Risk factors for worsening renal function and their association with long-term mortality following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: data from the SWEDEHEART registry.

Authors:  Georgios Vavilis; Marie Evans; Tomas Jernberg; Andreas Rück; Karolina Szummer
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2017-06-12

10.  Safety and efficacy of transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a current-generation balloon-expandable valve.

Authors:  Yong Zhan; Nicholas Toomey; Jamel Ortoleva; Masashi Kawabori; Andrew Weintraub; Frederick Y Chen
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.