Angela Lowenstern1,2, Steven J Lippmann3, J Matthew Brennan1,2, Tracy Y Wang1,2, Lesley H Curtis3,2, Ted Feldman4, Donald D Glower5, Bradley G Hammill3,2, Sreekanth Vemulapalli1,2. 1. Division of Cardiology (A.L., J.M.B., T.Y.W., S.V.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. 2. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (A.L., J.M.B., T.Y.W., L.H.C., B.G.H., S.V.). 3. Department of Population Health Sciences (S.J.L., L.H.C., B.G.H.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. 4. Cardiology Division, Evanston Hospital, Northshore University Health System, IL (T.F.). 5. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery (D.D.G.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical event committees are commonly employed for event validation in clinical studies, but little is known about the comparative performance of administrative claims data versus clinician-triggered event adjudication for ascertainment of adverse events in structural heart disease studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Medicare claims were linked to 418 patients >65 years of age who underwent transcatheter mitral valve repair (MitraClip) for severe mitral regurgitation from 2007 to 2013 as part of the EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair Study II) High-Risk Registry or the REALISM (Real World Expanded Multicenter Study of the MitraClip System) Continued-Access Registry. Each registry adjudicated mortality, heart failure hospitalization, renal failure, ventilation, and bleeding/transfusion within 1 year. Concordance of claims-based outcomes with events was assessed in 3 ways: 1-year occurrence, cumulative incidence, and synchrony of first events. For event occurrence, positive predictive value (PPV) of claims versus adjudication was the highest for mortality (PPV=97%) and heart failure hospitalization (PPV=69%) but lower for bleeding (PPV=40%) and renal failure (PPV=19%). Whereas claims-based cumulative incidence for mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and renal failure were consistent with clinician-triggered adjudication, incidence curves for bleeding events and ventilation diverged, with claims identifying a greater number of events. When events were detected by both methods, however, over 75% of event dates matched exactly. Mitral valve reinterventions were identified through claims with perfect sensitivity and specificity relative to physician adjudication. CONCLUSIONS: Ascertainment of mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and renal failure was highly concordant between physician adjudication and administrative claims. Further work is necessary to determine the role of administrative claims in event ascertainment in both prospective and retrospective studies of structural heart disease.
BACKGROUND: Clinical event committees are commonly employed for event validation in clinical studies, but little is known about the comparative performance of administrative claims data versus clinician-triggered event adjudication for ascertainment of adverse events in structural heart disease studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Medicare claims were linked to 418 patients >65 years of age who underwent transcatheter mitral valve repair (MitraClip) for severe mitral regurgitation from 2007 to 2013 as part of the EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair Study II) High-Risk Registry or the REALISM (Real World Expanded Multicenter Study of the MitraClip System) Continued-Access Registry. Each registry adjudicated mortality, heart failure hospitalization, renal failure, ventilation, and bleeding/transfusion within 1 year. Concordance of claims-based outcomes with events was assessed in 3 ways: 1-year occurrence, cumulative incidence, and synchrony of first events. For event occurrence, positive predictive value (PPV) of claims versus adjudication was the highest for mortality (PPV=97%) and heart failure hospitalization (PPV=69%) but lower for bleeding (PPV=40%) and renal failure (PPV=19%). Whereas claims-based cumulative incidence for mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and renal failure were consistent with clinician-triggered adjudication, incidence curves for bleeding events and ventilation diverged, with claims identifying a greater number of events. When events were detected by both methods, however, over 75% of event dates matched exactly. Mitral valve reinterventions were identified through claims with perfect sensitivity and specificity relative to physician adjudication. CONCLUSIONS: Ascertainment of mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and renal failure was highly concordant between physician adjudication and administrative claims. Further work is necessary to determine the role of administrative claims in event ascertainment in both prospective and retrospective studies of structural heart disease.
Authors: Alexander C Fanaroff; Pratik Manandhar; David R Holmes; David J Cohen; J Kevin Harrison; G Chad Hughes; Vinod H Thourani; Michael J Mack; Matthew W Sherwood; W Schuyler Jones; Sreekanth Vemulapalli Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Raffaele Piccolo; Thomas Pilgrim; Anna Franzone; Marco Valgimigli; Alan Haynes; Masahiko Asami; Jonas Lanz; Lorenz Räber; Fabien Praz; Bettina Langhammer; Eva Roost; Stephan Windecker; Stefan Stortecky Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: A Pieter Kappetein; Stuart J Head; Philippe Généreux; Nicolo Piazza; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Eugene H Blackstone; Thomas G Brott; David J Cohen; Donald E Cutlip; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Rebecca T Hahn; Ajay J Kirtane; Mitchell W Krucoff; Susheel Kodali; Michael J Mack; Roxana Mehran; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Pascal Vranckx; John G Webb; Stephan Windecker; Patrick W Serruys; Martin B Leon Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Donald D Glower; Saibal Kar; Alfredo Trento; D Scott Lim; Tanvir Bajwa; Ramon Quesada; Patrick L Whitlow; Michael J Rinaldi; Paul Grayburn; Michael J Mack; Laura Mauri; Patrick M McCarthy; Ted Feldman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Bruce M Psaty; Joseph A Delaney; Alice M Arnold; Lesley H Curtis; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Susan R Heckbert; Barbara McKnight; Diane Ives; John S Gottdiener; Lewis H Kuller; W T Longstreth Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Bradley G Hammill; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Gregg C Fonarow; Kevin A Schulman; Lesley H Curtis Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Neel M Butala; Jordan B Strom; Kamil F Faridi; Dhruv S Kazi; Yuansong Zhao; J Matthew Brennan; Jeffrey J Popma; Changyu Shen; Robert W Yeh Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Kamil F Faridi; Hector Tamez; Neel M Butala; Yang Song; Changyu Shen; Eric A Secemsky; Laura Mauri; Jeptha P Curtis; Jordan B Strom; Robert W Yeh Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2021-01-13
Authors: Neel M Butala; Kamil F Faridi; Eric A Secemsky; Yang Song; Jeptha Curtis; Charles Michael Gibson; Dhruv Kazi; Changyu Shen; Robert W Yeh Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-03-06 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Mikhael F El-Chami; Lindsay Bockstedt; Colleen Longacre; Lucas Higuera; Kurt Stromberg; George Crossley; Robert C Kowal; Jonathan P Piccini Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Fady S Riad; Maria Grau-Sepulveda; Oliver K Jawitz; Andrew M Vekstein; Varun Sundaram; Jayakumar Sahadevan; Robert H Habib; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Sean O'Brien; Vinod H Thourani; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Ying Xian; Albert L Waldo; Joseph Sabik Journal: Heart Rhythm O2 Date: 2022-06-16
Authors: Sanket S Dhruva; Craig S Parzynski; Ginger M Gamble; Jeptha P Curtis; Nihar R Desai; Robert W Yeh; Frederick A Masoudi; Richard Kuntz; Richard E Shaw; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Art Sedrakyan; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Harlan M Krumholz; Joseph S Ross Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-02-16 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Kael Wherry; Kurt Stromberg; Jennifer A Hinnenthal; Lisa A Wallenfelsz; Mikhael F El-Chami; Lindsay Bockstedt Journal: Pragmat Obs Res Date: 2020-02-28