Literature DB >> 33909472

The Effect of Visual Sort and Rate Versus Visual Analog Scales on the Reliability of Judgments of Dysphonia.

Mara R Kapsner-Smith1, Amanda Opuszynski1, Cara E Stepp2,3,4, Tanya L Eadie1.   

Abstract

Purpose The reliability of auditory-perceptual judgments between listeners is a long-standing problem in the assessment of voice disorders. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a relatively novel experimental scaling method, called visual sort and rate (VSR), yielded stronger reliability than the more frequently used method of visual analog scales (VAS) for ratings of overall severity (OS) and breathiness (BR) in speakers with voicedisorders. Method Fifty speech samples were selected from a database of speakers with voice disorders. Twenty-two inexperienced listeners provided ratings of OS or BR in four rating blocks: VSR-OS, VSR-BR, VAS-OS, and VSR-BR. For the VAS task, listeners rated each speaker for BR or OS using a vertically oriented 100-mm VAS. For the VSR task, stimuli were distributed into sets of samples with a range of speaker severities in each set. Listeners sorted and ranked samples for OS or BR within each set, and final ratings were captured on a vertically oriented 100-mm VAS. Interrater variability, defined as the mean of the squared differences between a listener's ratings and group mean ratings, and intrarater reliability (Pearson r) were compared across rating tasks for OS and BR using paired t tests. Results Results showed that listeners had significantly less interrater variability (better reliability) when using VSR methods compared to VAS for judgments of both OS and BR. Intrarater reliability was high across rating tasks and dimensions; however, ratings of BR were significantly more consistent within individual listeners when using VAS than when using VSR. Conclusions VSR is an experimental method that decreases variability of auditory-perceptual judgments between inexperienced listeners when rating speakers with a range of dysphonic severities and disorders. Future research should determine whether a clinically viable tool may be developed based on VSR principles and whether such benefits extend to experienced listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33909472      PMCID: PMC8608224          DOI: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  34 in total

1.  Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia.

Authors:  F L Wuyts; M S De Bodt; P H Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation.

Authors:  Karen M K Chan; Edwin M-L Yiu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  A comparison of two perceptual voice evaluation training programs for naive listeners.

Authors:  Karen M K Chan; Edwin M-L Yiu
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol.

Authors:  Gail B Kempster; Bruce R Gerratt; Katherine Verdolini Abbott; Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  The effect of the operator's handedness on some directional stereotypes in control-display relationships.

Authors:  A Chapanis; B A Gropper
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Listener Perception of Monopitch, Naturalness, and Intelligibility for Speakers With Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Supraja Anand; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures.

Authors:  Tanya L Eadie; Philip C Doyle
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Individual Monitoring of Vocal Effort With Relative Fundamental Frequency: Relationships With Aerodynamics and Listener Perception.

Authors:  Yu-An S Lien; Carolyn M Michener; Tanya L Eadie; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  The effect of anchor modality on the reliability of vocal severity ratings.

Authors:  Shaheen N Awan; Laura L Lawson
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain.

Authors:  Donald D Price; Patricia A McGrath; Amir Rafii; Barbara Buckingham
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 6.961

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.